Posted on 01/30/2023 6:25:44 PM PST by marshmallow
M. Shawn Copeland spews sewage from his/her/its mouth.
80% of the abuse was homosexual!
So, a bunch of guys were raping boys because of HETEROsexism? So glad the Jesuits never had the problem. Oh wait, they totally did.
List of Jesuits with Credible Allegations:
Michael O. Barry, SJ
Charles Bartles, SJ
Jody Blanchard, SJ
Br. Everard J. Booth, SJ
José Angel Borges, SJ
Claude P. Boudreaux, SJ
John Campbell, SJ
Cornelius J. Carr, SJ (New York Province which is now part of USA East Province)
Mark A. Clark, SJ
Francis X. Cleary SJ
James A. Condon, SJ (Chicago Province which is now part of USA Midwest Province)
Charles G. Coyle, SJ
Edward D. DeRussy, SJ
Donald Dickerson, SJ
Burton J. Fraser, SJ (Wisconsin Province which is now part of USA Midwest Province)
Chester E. Gaiter, SJ
Thomas J. Hatrel, SJ
Thomas J. Hidding, SJ
John W. Hough, SJ
Francis J. Kegel, SJ
Dennis P. Kirchoff, SJ
Bernard P. Knoth, SJ (Chicago Province which is now part of USA Midwest Province)
Patrick H. Koch, SJ
Philip D. Kraus, SJ
Francis M. Landwermeyer, SJ
Gerhardt B. Lehmkuhl, SJ
James D. Loeffler, SJ
Alfonso Madrid, SJ (Province of Mexico)
Eugene A. Maio, SJ
Vincent R. Malatesta, SJ
James L. McShane, SJ
Edward P. Murphy, SJ
Thomas J. Naughton, SJ (Priest of the New Orleans Province, NOT Brother Thomas Naughton of the Missouri Province)
Patrick H. O’Liddy, SJ
Vincent A. Orlando, SJ
Claude L. Ory, SJ (Brother, formerly in New Orleans Province, now USA East Province)
Austin N. Park SJ
J. Donald Pearce, SJ
George M. Pieper, SJ
Paul C. Pilgram, SJ
Samuel H. Ray, SJ
Elmo J. Rogero, SJ
Norman J. Rogge, SJ
Anthony J. Short, SJ
Benjamin Smylie, SJ
Arthur O. Verdieck, SJ
J. Patrick Walsh, SJ
Richard H. Witzofsky, SJ (Brother)
Benjamin Wren, SJ
I always thought it was because of centuries of taking money from europes wealthiest families to hide their “troubled” sons in monasteries.
How appropriate their initials are “FU”.
In an open letter to U.S. bishops, dated **August of 2002!**”, extremely experienced, accomplished and empathetic psychiatrist, and devout JPII-inspired lay Catholic, Dr. Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D., together with Peter Rudegeair, M.A. and Eugene F. Diamond, M.D., comprehensively laid out the facts with respect to this very issue, concluding unequivocally that the root cause is homosexuality on the part of the priest, combined with hard-hearted unwillingness on the part of that priest or uphold Catholic doctrine relating to sins of the flesh.
In other words, the letter was authoritative and definitive. Which is probably why it was not allowed to have a concomitant impact on diocesan or archdiocesan policy anywhere in the U.S.
The original publication of the five-page letter in .pdf form can be found here:
https://archive.iftcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Letter-to-the-Catholic-Bishops.pdf
Please see my #8. -OGINJ
I wonder if they used the word “SIN” once in the report?
This is the institutional equivalent of a Giant Squid squirting the mother of all ink bombs, deliberately obscuring, confusing, eliminating any possibility of accountability, and stultifying anyone and everyone who might still be awake, effectively preventing them from getting even the least challenging question in edgewise.
Thanks for the pdf.
YW.
And to to think that the great Fr. Vincent Miceli and Dr. William Mara once taught at this now decadent and apostate “University”.
So Jesus was just resisting “the Roman imperial order”?
Gotta go back and re-read my Bible.
I’m sure there are some fine priests in the Jesuit order but they are few and far between. The Jesuit bastards at Rose Hill certainly don’t do the university proud. Fordham like most other “Catholic” colleges and universities are CINO.
If you listen carefully you can hear St. Ignatius rolling over and vomiting in his grave..
In my Bible, Jesus said to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and render unto God what is God’s.
In my Bible, Jesus acknowledged that Pontius Pilate did indeed have power over life and death.
Hardly the words of one who was merely “resisting the Roman imperial order”.
Jesus did not resist the Romans — He precisely denied resisting Roman rule, as you quoted from Matthew 22:21.
Before you get any further upset at my post, recognize what these modern Pharisees are saying: Romans = modern white male heterosexual Christians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.