1 posted on
05/14/2022 7:23:24 PM PDT by
OneVike
To: OneVike
They should argue whether stairs go both up and down.
2 posted on
05/14/2022 7:36:30 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( I make airplanes fly, what's your super power?)
To: OneVike
Cute piece. If there is an author, he needs a proofreader.
There might be some people who want you to think that articles are written by people, but this view is totally unscientific.
"wander", not "wonder"
Capitalize "German Shepherd"
"copyright", not "copywrite"
You get the idea.
3 posted on
05/14/2022 7:40:55 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(“SollOZzo is known as 'The Turk.' He's supposed to be very good with a knife,"-T.Hagen)
To: OneVike
Definite articles or indefinite articles? Don’t they all go back to Anglo-Saxon words?
To: OneVike
Well I read all that but still ain’t sure what it is exactly you’re trying to get at here lol.
5 posted on
05/14/2022 7:44:21 PM PDT by
jimwatx
To: OneVike
Don't see evolution vs creation as a dichotomy.
Main stream science supports that the universe was created billions of years ago. This science may be wrong, but there are two camps that need it to be wrong in order to be correct:
1) Young-Earth Creationists, who need to show the universe was created only a few thousand years ago.
2) Materialists/Atheists/Naturalists, who need to show the universe was not created.
The argument between these two camps to see which main stream science supports seems silly. It supports neither. But again, main stream science in such matters is speculative and may change.
To: OneVike
While it appears they are in disagreement, they still seem to be tacitly agreeing the Earth is round.
11 posted on
05/14/2022 8:14:53 PM PDT by
C210N
(Everything will be okay in the end. If it’s not okay, it’s not the end.)
To: OneVike
The standard argument against intelligent design is nothing more than playing with words. It goes ‘That’s “religion”, therefore it’s not “science”, and therefore not a valid alternative to evolution’.
12 posted on
05/14/2022 8:19:26 PM PDT by
lasereye
To: OneVike
Both. They had to be created before they can evolve, but conditions can make them evolve. If they are unable to evolve their likelihood is that they will become extinct. So, there is a creator. 🙂
To: OneVike
Xerox machine, electronic articles, computers…does this include “articles” by the pin name Mark Twain?
Who is really Samuel Clemens?
21 posted on
05/14/2022 8:50:05 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: OneVike
Stupidest argument ever
Trying to be clever when you’re not always fails
28 posted on
05/14/2022 9:02:16 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: OneVike
40 posted on
05/15/2022 1:04:27 AM PDT by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: OneVike
Articles were created in Mr. Boyce’s 10th English Class. As were prepositions and dangling infinitaves.
51 posted on
05/16/2022 7:03:52 AM PDT by
sport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson