Glad you asked:
Posted on 01/28/2021 1:01:34 PM PST by Marchmain
Prelates, priests, pastors sign on as salesmen for abortion-tainted serum
Britain is conscripting clergy to promote abortion-tainted COVID-19 vaccines, as the government forces a counter-narrative to combat voices raising ethical and safety concerns about the jab.
Catholic priests, instructed by bishops, are publishing notes from the government's Coronavirus Places of Worship Task Force (CPWTF) on parish websites and newsletters, citing "strong encouragement from the government to counteract" vaccine dissent in churches.
"There should be explicit encouragement of community members to take up the offer of vaccines whenever it is offered to an individual," the government's propaganda to churches urges, pushing faith communities "to encourage and support the rollout of the vaccines."
(Excerpt) Read more at churchmilitant.com ...
Statechurch
They should focus on souls, not bodies. Stay in your lane.
WESTMINSTER, England
Always remember: it was the state churches of Europe, both Catholic and Protestant that killed Christians all across Europe, driving them to American shores. Virtually every Christian Group that came to America was some form of Ana Baptist (except Maryland, of course)
I must've slept through that lecture. What are they talking about?
Where is Jefferson’s “Wall of Separation” NOW, you hypocritical barking moonbats!
SSDD (Same Stuff Different Day)
(Because this is the Religion Forum and I try not to say the other word here.)
With Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines, after they were developed and tested by the companies, the FDA requires that independent labs separate from the companies verify the testing results by running their own completely independent tests. The independent testing was performed using fetal stem cells that originated from an abortion that was performed in 1973 in the Netherlands.
Pfizer and Moderna had no control over the testing and its methods (hence - independent). And no fetal stem cells were used to develop or produce either vaccine. This was after-the-fact verification testing done by an outside entity. Other groups developing vaccines (such as Oxford) used fetal stem cells directly in their research and development of COVID-19 vaccines.
Here’s a breakdown of how ethically each vaccine was developed by the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute: https://s27589.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/An-Ethics-Assessment-of-COVID-19-Vaccine-Programs_On-Point-46.pdf
Pfizer and Moderna are both listed under “ethically uncontroversial”.
Update: COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates and Abortion-Derived Cell Lines
It's doesn't matter whether Pfizer and Moderna had no control over testing; the vaccines are abortion-tainted and not morally ethical.
They were fully researched, developed, and tested without any use of fetal stem cells. The product was complete, packaged, and ready to ship.
Then a third party lab did testing with fetal stem cells. After the product was fully produced. So what you’re saying is that if somebody today tested Tylenol on fetal stem cells, all Tylenol is now tainted and its use is unethical?
I completely agree that fetal stem cell testing is unnecessary and should never be used. There are more ethical means to do the necessary testing. And if it costs a little more and takes a little longer, then so be it. That’s a price worth paying to avoid the moral and ethical issues. But to say that any product that is later tested with fetal stem cells is suddenly tainted for all time and cannot be used? That’s a step too far in my opinion.
Why were you promoting the Johnson and Johnson vax on another thread?
I hope you don't have to tell that to the baby girl who's life was sacrificed , if you ever meet her. I wonder what her reaction would be.
How could a product be fully produced with no prior testing?
P.S. Tylenol is not life-saving and there are alternatives to it.
I think you misunderstood. I said it would be a price worth paying to spend a little more money or a little more time using ethical cell lines to develop products and to avoid using fetal stem cells.
Do you have a quote where I promoted the Johnson & Johnson vaccine?
Stating that it’s about to be approved is simply stating a fact. It’s not “promoting” anything.
They were tested. All testing was complete. The products were ready to go.
The FDA requires that - as a follow up to your own testing - you pay to have someone else do confirmatory testing. They repeat the testing that you have already done to ensure they get the same results you got. This demonstrates to the FDA that your results are accurate. The products have to be tested before you can do confirmatory testing. Moderna had tested the Moderna vaccine. It was tested and complete. Pfizer had tested the Pfizer vaccine. It was tested and complete.
These were complete products - fully researched, fully developed, fully produced, and fully tested - and ready to ship. And zero use of fetal stem cells at any step of that process. In fact, thanks to President Trump's negotiations, they had already produced millions of doses of each product, packaged them, and had them sitting in freezers before any confirmatory testing was done.
So there's a completed product, sitting in a freezer, awaiting the government's go-ahead to ship to hospitals so it can be given to people. Zero fetal stem cells used at any point. Then the government says "send some of it to these guys so they can check your work", and the guys who check the work use fetal stem cells. That's the situation they're in. There is no tainting. The product sitting in those freezers never had any fetal stem cells used to create it. It was sitting in the freezer as a finished product when somebody else unrelated to the company that created it used fetal stem cells to do independent testing after the fact.
So again, if that same lab took some Tylenol they grabbed off a shelf at Walgreens and tested it on fetal stem cells, would you call Tylenol morally tainted? Of course not. There would be no reason to.
"P.S. Tylenol is not life-saving"
Thank you for agreeing that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are life-saving. I too believe they will save many lives.
Glad you asked:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.