Good. If one can protest, one should be able to do whatever else he/she/it wants to. Just don't go to church!
Again, Whatever else he/she/it wants to do. Just do it and just don't go to church!
If a woman is a man then ten people are one hundred people.
so the Police are way to busy checking Churches to worry about all the Murders
Good. If one can protest, one should be able to do whatever else he/she/it wants to. Just don't go to church!
Again, Whatever else he/she/it wants to do. Just do it and just don't go to church!
Ignore his unlawful, unconstitutional orders and dare him to try to enforce them. It would make great news footage of the police hauling people away from attending church.
Just call it a protest.
Face Covering Directive in Lincoln (people of color exempt)
Lincoln.co ^
Posted on 6/23/2020, 5:52:31 AM by MNDude
Order 6/17/2020 - Face Covering Directive (signed directive in Supporting Documents - below)
General directive: All individuals in Lincoln County are required to wear face coverings during any indoor public setting or outdoor public location where a person will be in within six feet of another individual, who does not share the same household.
Exceptions: ...
People of color who have heightened concerns about racial profiling and harassment due to wearing face coverings in public
just call it a protest, no problem
The rebellion begun has.
This article doesn’t identify which judges ruled on this case.
I’m telling you, true churches are gonna have to go underground soon.
What about a protest, also limited to 10 people?
Probably time to rise up, and form a Burning Looting Movement like the BLM did.
Is there a 10 person limit on protests???
Nope.
If the Left doesn’t have to follow “the law” then neither do we.
Make it a point to have 25 people show up - All armed to the teeth.
Try to enforce it.
The answer is to flip them the finger and ignore them just like the protesters. They count on fear based compliance. They fear the “optics” of arresting people at church. Force them...
If you can have a sanctuary city where criminals are protected throughout the city, why can’t you have a sanctuary church where criminals, as defined by the same people that protect criminals from prosecution, are protected by the church and recognized by the state government using the same intellection? If one is not prosecuted, why should the other one be especially when the church people are not creating crimes like murder, rape, and theft and being in one place. And the criminal has an even greater opportunity to get and spread the virus since he is free to cover more ground. Doesn’t make sense unless you are counting their voting base. They might want to reference the 14th amendment concerning equal protection under the law.
rwood
Unless they provide abortion then the sky is the limit
Then lets restrict “news” broadcasts to ten minutes and newspapers to 10 pages.
Just keep watching. God will take care of the restrictions.