Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats yet again sue Little Sisters of the Poor for contraception coverage
LifeSite News ^ | May 23, 2019 | Doug Mainwaring

Posted on 05/23/2019 11:07:57 AM PDT by ebb tide

Democrats yet again sue Little Sisters of the Poor for contraception coverage

May 23, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — The Little Sisters of the Poor are once again the target of liberals in government who believe that the sisters must be strong-armed into violating their consciences by providing contraceptives and abortifacients to their employees, or face extinction.

After fighting a lengthy battle against the Obama administration to defend their religious liberty, their ministries to the poor and elderly, and their very existence, the sisters had finally found relief when the Trump administration granted them an exemption.

Pennsylvania attorney general Josh Shapiro now wants to take that exemption away from the Little Sisters of the Poor and again force them to comply with the Health and Human Services (HHS) birth control mandate. If Shapiro prevails and the sisters resist, they will be forced to pay tens of millions of dollars in fines.   

“Despite a 2016 victory at the U.S. Supreme Court, an Executive Order, and a new rule that protects the Little Sisters of the Poor and other non-profit religious groups from the unconstitutional HHS mandate, the Little Sisters are still in court,” notes a statement by Becket Law, the attorney group representing the Little Sisters of the Poor. “In November 2017, after the federal government issued their new rule protecting religious groups from the mandate, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and several other states sued in federal court to take away the nuns’ hard-won religious exemption.”

“This lawsuit, and the one similarly perpetuated by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, exists solely to stomp on the religious liberties of a group of women serving the poor and needy,” wrote Washington Examiner commentator Nicole Russell. “It has nothing to do with anyone’s violation of the law.”

The Obama administration “never should have targeted nuns to provide birth control because there are so many other viable ways to retrieve it,” said Russell. “It’s like suing Alcoholics Anonymous for refusing to pay for their employees’ vodka while the local liquor store sits open down the street.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit heard arguments this week in the case, known as Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Trump.

“To say the nuns have to give [contraceptives and abortifacients] out is, and always has been, preposterous,” said Becket Law attorney Mark Rienzi after Tuesday’s hearing.

“Sadly,  Josh Shapiro and Xavier Becerra think  attacking nuns is a way to score political points,” Rienzi had noted previously. “These men  may think their campaign  donors want them to sue nuns, but our guess is most taxpayers disagree.”

“No one needs nuns in order to get contraceptives, and no one needs these guys reigniting the last administration’s divisive and unnecessary culture war,” added Rienzi.

“It is utterly incomprehensible that in a free country like the United States, Catholic nuns who care for the elderly poor are being harassed with new lawsuits to force them to provide contraceptives and abortifacients,” remarked Maureen Ferguson, senior policy adviser for the Catholic Association, when Pennsylvania A.G. Shapiro first launched his legal action. “The Little Sisters of the Poor finally received relief from the federal government’s executive order on religious liberty, yet now the politically motivated state attorneys general of Pennsylvania and California are on the attack.”

The Washington Examiner’s Nicole Russell continued:

The government should never have taken upon its shoulders the significant task of ensuring birth control is available to everyone, to say nothing of the concept that every religious group in the country provide it against their wishes. But because the government did so, and because liberal politicians love nothing more than to force religious people to align to the government’s whims, however absurd, the Little Sisters of the Poor cannot be left alone to care for the poor and needy as they desire.

Instead, they must spend time and resources battling the authoritarian proclivities of a few politicians who, rather than addressing other local issues certainly of higher concern, such as crime, the economy, and education, want to force nuns to provide birth control.

The three-judge panel that heard the oral arguments presented on Tuesday consisted of  U.S. circuit judges Patty Shwartz, Theodore McKee, and Julio Fuentes


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; nazis; sin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/23/2019 11:07:57 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Biggirl; Coleus; DuncanWaring; ebb tide; Fedora; Hieronymus; irishjuggler; G Larry; ...

Ping


2 posted on 05/23/2019 11:08:58 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Every Democrat is a violent totalitarian thug.


3 posted on 05/23/2019 11:12:45 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Here’s one way to help the Little Sisters.

For those who order from Amazon: They have a program called AmazonSmile. If you sign up for it (it’s free), 0.5% of all your future purchases will go to a charity of your choice.

The Little Sisters of the Poor are one of the eligible charities.


4 posted on 05/23/2019 11:18:30 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The Democrats, they want women to get pregnant so they can kill the children
5 posted on 05/23/2019 11:19:03 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The FAR LEFT, hate-FILLED, insufferably ARROGANT, DIMocRATS never seem to learn anything. = MORONS, each & every one.

Yours, TMN78247


6 posted on 05/23/2019 11:19:39 AM PDT by TMN78247 ("VICTORY or DEATH", William Barrett Travis, LtCol, comdt., Fortress of the Alamo, Bejar, 1836)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Little Sisters should give out for free the original Catholic approved contraception:

An Aspirin..................to be held tightly between the knees..................


7 posted on 05/23/2019 11:19:53 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The D party machine bosses are the biggest threat to the survival of this country and must be removed and prosecuted ASAP, imho


8 posted on 05/23/2019 11:22:38 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Federal law supersedes state law unless democrats chose to object.


9 posted on 05/23/2019 11:24:19 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It only takes a little imagination to defeat that method.


10 posted on 05/23/2019 11:25:51 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Government is as evil as Google.

5.56mm


11 posted on 05/23/2019 11:27:42 AM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

This seems to be the new Democrat strategy.
To hell with losing—whether it be a court decision or an election.

Continue playing to the low-info crowd that’s totally unaware —or doesn’t care— that those battles have already been decided in favor of the Constitution.

Bankrupt & exhaust the winners by continuing to attack, smear, sue, harass & sabotage until (they hope) the victors get tired of fighting and surrender.
Or until the public gets fed up & blames the victors for the ongoing histrionics and just wants change, any change that might bring peace.


12 posted on 05/23/2019 11:29:07 AM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Thanks for that tip!


13 posted on 05/23/2019 11:29:36 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
“Despite a 2016 victory at the U.S. Supreme Court, an Executive Order, and a new rule that protects the Little Sisters of the Poor and other non-profit religious groups from the unconstitutional HHS mandate,

This alone should have landed the AG of these States in CONTEMPT OF COURT, summarily fined $25,000 and JAILED for 30 days, a Formal Complaint to the BAR association and the Supreme Court for permanent disbarment.

oh I forgot it isn't about Homosexual Marriage.
14 posted on 05/23/2019 11:29:56 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TMN78247

“VICTORY or DEATH”, Alex Rogan, incredulously, The Last Starfighter, 1984

The Rogue One guy is working on a sequel.

I was a serious arcade guy at the right time in my life for this. :-)


15 posted on 05/23/2019 11:35:03 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I thought President Trump signed an executive order on this?


16 posted on 05/23/2019 11:35:45 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Not to worry, the bishops at the USCCB will jump right on this and protect the nuns. I just know it..../s


17 posted on 05/23/2019 11:45:12 AM PDT by Shark24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Which Little Sisters of the Poor should I select?

Here’s one way to help the Little Sisters.

For those who order from Amazon: They have a program called AmazonSmile. If you sign up for it (it’s free), 0.5% of all your future purchases will go to a charity of your choice.

The Little Sisters of the Poor are one of the eligible charities.


18 posted on 05/23/2019 11:48:06 AM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

FWIW: Two Clinton appointees, and Patty Shwartz an Obama appointee.


19 posted on 05/23/2019 11:52:40 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists call 'em what you will they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

> Which Little Sisters of the Poor should I select? [for AmazonSmile] <

I didn’t see any national organization when I signed up. Maybe there’s one now, I don’t know. I just selected the Little Sisters closest to where I live.

But I think one group would be as good as any other. They are all great people.


20 posted on 05/23/2019 12:01:04 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson