Skip to comments.
St. Joseph and Manhood
Archdiocese of Washington ^
| 03-19-17
| Msgr. Charles Pope
Posted on 03/20/2017 8:23:03 AM PDT by Salvation
![](http://blog.adw.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/St_Joseph-205x300.jpg)
I remember once being amused to hear that a 19th century Franciscan theologian (whose name I cannot recall) wrote a six-volume set called The Life of St. Joseph. How could one possibly get enough material to fill six volumes? We know so little about Joseph from Scripture. He seems to have been the strong, silent type. Not a word of his is recorded, but his actions have much to say, especially to men.
On this feast of St. Joseph, we do well to ponder him as a model for manhood, for husbands and fathers.
- Joseph is a man who obeys God and clings to his wife. Joseph was betrothed to Mary. This is more than being engaged; it means they were actually married. It was common at the time for couples to marry at a young age. Once betrothed they lived an additional year in their parents household while they became more acquainted and prepared for life together. At a certain point it was discovered that Mary was pregnant, though not by Joseph. Scripture describes Joseph as a just man. This does not mean that Joseph was fair and a nice guy (though I presume he was); it means that he was a follower of the Law. He based his life on the Jewish Law that God gave through Moses, as interpreted by the rabbis. The Law said that if a man discovered that his betrothed was not a virgin, he should divorce her and not sully his home. As a follower of the Law, Joseph was prepared to follow its requirements. However, he did not wish to expose Mary to its full force, which would have permitted her to be stoned. Hence, he chose to follow the Law by filing a divorce decree without publicly accusing her. He would remain quiet as to his reason for the divorce and Mary would escape possible stoning. To fail to divorce Mary would expose Joseph to cultural ramifications. Just men didnt marry women guilty of fornication or adultery. To ignore this might have harmed not only Josephs standing in the community but also that of his family of origin. You know the rest of the story: Joseph is told in a dream that he should not be afraid because Mary has committed no sin. Matthew records, When Joseph awoke, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife (Matt 1:24). Now a man obeys God even if it is not popular, even if he has to suffer for it. Joseph is told to cling to his wife; he may suffer for it, but he obeys God rather than men. It takes a strong man to do this, especially when we consider the culture in which Joseph lived, and that he lived in a small town no less. Joseph model of strong manhood has something to say to the men of our day. In current Catholic wedding vows, a man promises to cling to his wife for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health. Our culture often pressures men to bail out when there is trouble. Joseph shows the proper way by obeying God over the pressures of the prevailing culture, even if he will personally suffer for it.
- Joseph is a man whose vocation is more important to him than his career. In Bethlehem, Joseph is warned by an angel in a dream, Get up, take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him (Matt 2:13). Joseph may well have had much to lose in this flight. Back in Nazareth he had a business, a career if you will. He had business prospects, business partners, and contacts. Fleeing to a distant land might mean that others would take away his business. But Joseph was a father and husband before he was a businessman. His child was threatened and his first obligation was to Jesus and Mary. His vocation outweighed his career. Today, too many parents make their careers and livelihood paramount, relegating their children to day care; Joseph demonstrates different priorities. It is true that many parents feel they have no choice but to work, but it is also true that many demand a standard of living that requires extra income to maintain. Perhaps a smaller house and fewer amenities would permit their children to have a childhood without day care. Joseph shows the way for parents: vocation has priority over career. For fathers especially, Joseph shows that a man is a husband and father before he is a businessman.
- Joseph is a man who protects his family. Joseph models a protective instinct that too many men lack today. Like Jesus, our children are exposed to many dangers. In the United Sates there arent a lot of physical dangers to fear, but moral dangers surely abound. Fathers, what are your children watching on television? What are they looking at on the Internet? Who are their friends? What do your children think about important moral issues? Are you preparing them to face the moral challenges and temptations of life? Are you and your wife teaching them the faith? Are you just a passive father, minimally involved in the raising of your children? A man protects his children from harm, physical, moral, and spiritual. Joseph demonstrates this aspect of manhood.
- Joseph is a man of work. Scripture refers to Joseph as a carpenter (Matt 13:55). The Greek word used, however, is τέκτονος (tekton os), which can mean more than a woodworker. It can also refer to a builder or any craftsman. It seems unlikely that Joseph and Jesus would have worked exclusively in wood, as it was fairly rare in the Holy Land and used more sparingly than it is today. Stone was surely plentiful at that time, so it may be that Joseph worked with stone as well as wood. It was through His work that Joseph supported his family. It is the call of a man to work diligently and to provide for his family responsibly and reliably, and Joseph models this well. St. Paul felt it necessary to rebuke some of the men of his day for their idleness: In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you to keep away from every brother who is idle and does not live according to the teaching you received from us
. For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: If a man will not work, he shall not eat. We hear that some among you are idle. They are not busy; they are busybodies. Such people we command and urge in the Lord Jesus Christ that with quietness they earn the bread they eat (2 Thess 3:10-12).
- Joseph is a man who teaches his son. We learn from Scripture that Jesus was a carpenter (Mk 6:3). It is obvious that it was Joseph who taught Him this trade. Consider the hours that they spent together as Joseph patiently handed his trade on to Jesus, teaching Him its methods and intricacies. It is not enough for a father to provide for his children; he must also prepare them for life. He does this through modeling and teaching discipline, moderation, hard work, self-control, and many other life skills. Today it is relatively rare for men to teach a trade to their sons or to other children. In the end, a man prepares his children for life. Joseph models manhood by preparing Jesus for life as a tradesman. Some (e.g., St. Thomas Aquinas) argue that Joseph did not teach Jesus carpentry and that His knowledge was not learned, but I cannot square this with the Scripture that indicates Jesus grew in age, grace, and wisdom (see Lk 2:52). If Jesus can even grow in human wisdom, how much more so in lesser knowledge. At any rate, however much Jesus was taught by Joseph, every father should teach his sons and daughters!
Joseph is a model for manhood. Nothing he ever said was recorded, but his life speaks eloquently. He is referred to as the Guardian and Patron of the Universal Church. He has these titles because he was guardian, protector, and patron (provider) of the Church in its earliest stage: when the Church was just Jesus and Mary. Because the Church is the mystical Body of Christ, in protecting, providing, and preparing Jesus, he was doing that for us, for we are in Christ as members of His body. Men do well to imitate St. Joseph and invoke his patronage in all their endeavors as husbands, fathers, and providers.
St. Joseph, pray for us.
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; father; fatherhood; fathers; joseph; manhood; saintjoseph; stjoseph
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Joseph is a model for manhood.... St. Joseph, pray for us.
1
posted on
03/20/2017 8:23:03 AM PDT
by
Salvation
To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...
2
posted on
03/20/2017 8:25:32 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation
Plus God rewarded him with other children.
Psalms 127:3 Children are a blessing and a gift from the Lord.
3
posted on
03/20/2017 8:28:15 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I just got done celebrating Black History Month. Obama and Kaepernick are both history. Hurray!)
To: BipolarBob; Salvation
Oh most emphatically yes! We are in a sense his foster sons and daughters, since St. Joseph is the protector of the “children” of the Church.
4
posted on
03/20/2017 8:36:52 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("Be sober, be watchful.... the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking some one to devour.")
To: BipolarBob
Most likely from a prior marriage. Women often in those days passed on first.
5
posted on
03/20/2017 8:37:53 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: BipolarBob
Other children?
Mary only had one son, Jesus Christ, our Savior.
6
posted on
03/20/2017 9:01:49 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation
He has these titles because he was guardian, protector, and patron (provider) of the Church in its earliest stage: when the Church was just Jesus and MarySince the church is the bride of Christ, the only way this could be true is if the Nestorians are correct, and Mary only gave birth to Jesus' human nature which could become part of a church, while Jesus' divine nature, which is still awaiting his marriage to the church, was off somewhere else.
I think it would be more accurate to say that the church in its earliest age consisted of Mary and Joseph--or, perhaps, that the church did not yet exist, first since no one had been baptized in the name of Jesus, and second since none had been baptized in the Holy Spirit, which occurs at Pentecost.
7
posted on
03/20/2017 9:07:45 AM PDT
by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: BipolarBob
Name them. If your claim is based on Scripture, their names are in there. Otherwise you’re trying to bind believers to something not contained in the clear words of Scripture, aren’t you?
8
posted on
03/20/2017 9:14:55 AM PDT
by
Campion
(Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
To: Biggirl
Nothing indicates/supports that view. A conceivable possibility, yes, but not a shred of evidence of it actually being the case. You’d think that if he was traveling to Bethlehem, then to Egypt, _on_foot_, that there’d be at least some mention of his others if there were any - not to mention the other situations where “brothers” are mentioned with zero indication they’re not hers, nor his by another.
The only impetus for this notion is the hysterical insistence that Mary _never_ acted as a normal (and fertile!) wife for Joseph - which then raises the prospect of their having never consummated, meaning they are not recognized as married, which then leads to a host of other strange problems (Mary & Joseph just shacked up?). In a culture where procreation was paramount (to the point of barrenness lamented), staying together without “trying” seems odd.
An oft-suppressed truth of Scripture is the sheer _mundanity_ of His life. He had normal healthy parents who had other offspring after Him. Occam’s Razor applies.
9
posted on
03/20/2017 9:15:35 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
To: Campion
“If your claim is based on Scripture, their names are in there.”
It says he had brothers - clearly, several times.
There is no need for God to provide names just because you demand them.
10
posted on
03/20/2017 9:19:22 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(Understand the Left: "The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution.")
To: ctdonath2
Are you confusing the words “brothers” or “sisters” with the word in use at that time: “brethren”, which was used for all relatives?
They were extended family or friends.
Many minister use the phrase “Brothers and sisters”, but they are really talking to their congregation.
11
posted on
03/20/2017 9:24:31 AM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Campion
If your claim is based on Scripture, their names are in there. James, Joseph, Judas and Simon are mentioned in Scripture as His brothers and the fact that He had sisters is also documented but as the custom was their names are not mentioned. Matt. 13:55 and Mark 6:3.
The words are clear enough to me (without the Catholic colored glasses on).
12
posted on
03/20/2017 9:49:12 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I just got done celebrating Black History Month. Obama and Kaepernick are both history. Hurray!)
To: Salvation; ctdonath2
Are you confusing the words brothers or sisters with the word in use at that time: No confusion on our part. They are grouping this Mans family. Specifically His father, mother and siblings.
13
posted on
03/20/2017 9:51:52 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I just got done celebrating Black History Month. Obama and Kaepernick are both history. Hurray!)
To: Biggirl; Campion
Most likely from a prior marriage. Now, who is trying to bind believers to something not contained in the clear words of Scripture?
14
posted on
03/20/2017 10:03:04 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I just got done celebrating Black History Month. Obama and Kaepernick are both history. Hurray!)
To: BipolarBob
Bob, I have a friend, who was born and raised in Greece. He speaks 7 languages. I asked him to look at the Greek, where the names of Jesus' brothers were given. He told me, the Greek words indicate they were not cousins, but children of the same mother and father, Mary and Joseph.
On the other hand, I don't think it really matters much. I just want to know what the plan of salvation is. It doesn't matter much, what people may have right or wrong, if they end up in a burning Hell.
15
posted on
03/20/2017 10:28:27 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(20 years a USAF Air Traffic Controller, RETIRED. A career that will make you old before your time)
To: ctdonath2
Just a different viewpoint.
16
posted on
03/20/2017 10:58:59 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Mark17
17
posted on
03/20/2017 11:00:28 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Mrs. Don-o
“since St. Joseph is the protector of the children of the Church.”
Chapter and verse please. If no reference, please link to some evidence that anyone before 100ad taught or believed this.
Thanks.
To: ctdonath2
Yet there were extended family members.
19
posted on
03/20/2017 11:05:52 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
My dear aMPU, good afternoon to you!
Your question seems to assume that one could have, or needs to have, "proof" for pious devotions. This is by noi means the case.
It's as if to say, "prove" to me that refrigerator magnets portraying "Praying Hands" were taught in Scripture or were thought at any time prior to 1928 to be permitted in a Christian home. :o)
St. Joseph was (as we know from Scripture) protector of the Holy Family, hence of the Christ Child; we may (again, Scripturally) consider ourselves Christ's brothers and sisters, and hence part of His household (the Church); and from that, St. Joseph is seen as protecting us. And he's not the only one. We all -- all! --- share spiritual goods with each other through prayer. This is known as the Communion of Saints.
Pretty straightforward analogy, motivated by love.
You're welcome.
20
posted on
03/20/2017 11:30:28 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
("In Christ we form one body, and each member belongs to all the others." Romans 12:5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson