Alex Murphy consistently posted anti-Catholic threads. I don’t think vlad posts anti-Protestant threads.
Why are you making the thread about a poster, rather than commenting on the article?
There was a span of years which he posted many articles from media around the nation in regards to the sexual abuse scandals. In his last years here, not so much. He rarely commented. Even when posting threads, Murphy had a practice of quoting portions of an article -- without commenting much at all. People around here would react like their hair was on fire.
Face it. He was banned chiefly because he was hated by Roman Catholics. People lobbied management here to get him ousted. FACT.
Why does vladi (and many other 'Catholics') make threads be about freepers here, seeming to always include commentary of a personal nature?
And what of all his negativity, and statements of insulting condemnation for Protestants (the people themselves) in general? It's just so much nonstop flame-bait. What's good for the Murph, should serve for the vladi.
If posting so-called anti "Catholic" threads is enough to get a poster banned, then why not posting anti-Protestant freeper comments (aimed at specific freepers, and a whole class of persons, generally) which consistently tend strongly towards the personal NOT get someone banned?
I don't expect genuine answers to these sort of inquiries, and do not demand them from yourself in this matter. So please do feel in any way obligated to respond, if you would prefer not to.
Looks like he did comment on the article and then was called a drunk (masked as a question.)
Click on the link to see where it started.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3391571/posts?page=9#9
Don't you think it would be a good idea to see where a problem originated before making biased accusations?
“Why are you making the thread about a poster, rather than commenting on the article?”
BlueDragon is doing it because this is his best opportunity to get me banned. I should not have said “Are you drunk?” to SkyPilot. I posted what I posted, however, because it seemed appropriate according to the bizarre idiocy of SkyPilot’s comment. If I took the time I could have worded my comment in such a way that it was more obviously about the stupidity of his comment and could not be so easily construed as about him. When I consider what has been posted about me over the years here, that comment is not the end of the world.
If the RM chooses to delete the post I understand. But then your post should be deleted too, BlueDragon for doing exactly what you accuse me of doing.
I’m just saying. . .
And to SkyPilot: I should not have asked if you were drunk. For that I apologize.
Interesting statement being as you thanked him on an anti-Protestant thread for posting the truth.
To hear it told; there ARE no Anti-Prot threads on FR.