“Why are you making the thread about a poster, rather than commenting on the article?”
BlueDragon is doing it because this is his best opportunity to get me banned. I should not have said “Are you drunk?” to SkyPilot. I posted what I posted, however, because it seemed appropriate according to the bizarre idiocy of SkyPilot’s comment. If I took the time I could have worded my comment in such a way that it was more obviously about the stupidity of his comment and could not be so easily construed as about him. When I consider what has been posted about me over the years here, that comment is not the end of the world.
If the RM chooses to delete the post I understand. But then your post should be deleted too, BlueDragon for doing exactly what you accuse me of doing.
I’m just saying. . .
And to SkyPilot: I should not have asked if you were drunk. For that I apologize.
No worries. Matthew 6: 14-15 applies to all of us. Have a good day.
There have been far better "opportunities" as for examples of reason and justification. Will there be more?
Even the difficult to follow, argumentative style of recapping conversation that you have -- is toxic, poisoning the atmosphere of the religion forum, setting example for others to follow.
Oh?
If I get banned, or timed out, or scolded/rebuked; it is my fault ONLY.
I do dumb stuff, and I get hauled to the woodshed.
I've learned NOT to say: "That don't hurt!"