You guys certainly have a 'cloak and daggers' type drama with your headshed.
Posted on 09/25/2015 12:53:51 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
"STUNNING ADMISSION: Hyper-Progressive Cardinal Danneels Admits Being in Mafia Dedicated to Unseat PBXVI"
Pride goeth before the fall. The modernists are apparently feeling very powerful and secure, because they are starting to open their mouths and crow about both their opposition to Pope Benedict XVI, dropping hints they played a role in his abdication, as well as quite possibly illicitly organizing to elect Pope Francis.
Further serious concerns are being raised about Cardinal Godfried Danneels, one of the papal delegates chosen to attend the upcoming Ordinary Synod on the Family, after the archbishop emeritus of Brussels confessed this week to being part of a radical “mafia” reformist group opposed to Benedict XVI.The plain implication is that these men were probably driving forces behind the Vatileaks and other difficulties that plagued PBXVI’s pontificate, helping convince the beleaguered Pope Emeritus that abdication was his best alternative. Of course, there have also been dark hints of a turncoat “disciple” of Ratzinger that played a key role in convincing him to abdicate, promising him that someone of a like mind would be elected and bring the constant stream of scandals afflicting the Vatican to an end. Who that turncoat is has not been revealed to date.It was also revealed this week that he once wrote a letter to the Belgium government favoring same-sex “marriage” legislation because it ended discrimination against LGBT groups.
The cardinal is already known for having once advised the king of Belgium to sign an abortion law in 1990, for telling a victim of clerical sex abuse to keep quiet, and for refusing to forbid pornographic, “educational” materials being used in Belgian Catholic schools.
He also once said same-sex “marriage” was a “positive development,” although he has sought to distinguish such a union from the Church’s understanding of marriage.
……..At the launch of the book in Brussels this week, the cardinal said he was part of a secret club of cardinals opposed to Pope Benedict XVI.
He called it a “mafia” club that bore the name of St. Gallen. The group wanted a drastic reform of the Church, to make it “much more modern”, and for Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to head it. The group, which also comprised Cardinal Walter Kasper and the late Jesuit Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, has been documented in Austen Ivereigh’s biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer.
Nevertheless, this second admission, coupled with admissions made in the book alluded to in Pentin’s post above (The Great Reformer), seems to point to at least a reasonable possibility that there was illegal collusion between various cardinals at the conclave of 2013. Of course, Pope John Paul II had made such collusion an excommunicable offense and evidence of such would cast a huge shadow of doubt on the validity of the conclave itself. We’re very far from having anywhere near enough evidence to question that validity at present, but there is perhaps enough evidence for some kind of formal investigation by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to begin. Not that anyone expects that to happen, but who knows. We are told God is a God of surprises, and this would be quite a big one.
Danneels is a thoroughly repulsive character, the very model of the progressive-modernist post-conciliar prelate. Beloved by the media and Eurozone political types for his modernist stands, it appears only his powerful political connections kept him from being charged in the cover up of repeated boy rape. He played a decisive role in covering up the repeated sodomizing of young boys by his protege Roger Vangheluwe. It is hardly surprising that such a creature would oppose Pope Benedict XVI, and not much of a stretch to believe that he would have no scruples about violating Church Law to assure a successor more amenable to his disastrously modernist outlook.
I have a feeling this is a scandal that won’t go away anytime soon.
“...An article of the of the apostolic constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, which regulates papal elections, has established that cardinals before the election “shall further abstain from any form of pact, agreement, promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or persons.”
The conclave rules in the apostolic constitution, issued by St. John Paul II in 1996, stressed that automatic excommunication is incurred by cardinals who commit to an electoral agreement for a papal conclave...”
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/author-cardinals-differ-over-claim-of-conclave-campaigning/
Egad!
Goodfellas.
Get your shine box Cardinal Danneels.
Wow.
It has always been clear (at least to me, and I'm not even Catholic) that Benedict XVI was forced out.
Conspiracy theorists can have a field day about the forces at play, but the old predictions that the antiCHRIST would be a Pope don't seem nearly as far-fetched as they once did.
"...Meanwhile, there is growing awareness among Catholics that “Francis” is increasingly manifesting himself to be exactly what St. Francis of Assisi foretold in his deathbed prophecy — “uncanonically elected”, and, “not a true pastor but a destroyer.” "
From Yes Prime Minister (The Bishop’s Gambit)
James Hacker: Humphrey, what’s a Modernist in the Church of England?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Ah, well, the word “Modernist” is code for non-believer.
James Hacker: You mean an atheist?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: No, Prime Minister. An atheist clergyman couldn’t continue to draw his stipend. So, when they stop believing in God, they call themselves “Modernists”.
James Hacker: How could the Church of England suggest an atheist as Bishop of Bury St Edmunds?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Well, very easily. The Church of England is primarily a social organization, not a religious one.
James Hacker: Is it?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: Oh yes. It’s part of the rich social fabric of this country. So bishops need to be the sorts of chaps who speak properly and know which knife and fork to use. The sort of people one can look up to.
You guys certainly have a 'cloak and daggers' type drama with your headshed.
What exactly can lay 'folk' in the Catholic church do about this conspiracy? More than just speak up? Can you form a Lay Council to unseat a false pope?
Quote-but the old predictions that the antiCHRIST would be a Pope don’t seem nearly as far-fetched as they once did.
People better hope that a Pope is the ‘antichrist’ and not pointing to the ‘antichrist’..
Because last I checked, December 25 and Easter Sunday are not just holy days for Roman Catholics.
The first reformers did have something to say about Rome and the papacy and popes..
Not sure how they would feel about a world that sets its work and worship by a Roman calendar named after a Pope like it does today..
Would the first reformers call it antichrist’s calendar?
Popes were regarded as antichrist’s in a papacy that was the ‘seat of antichrist’ for the first reformers.
What a world..
I think the removal of Bergoglio may be provoked by the Synod. But it wouldn’t be the laypeople; there’d have to be enough heirarchs to decide that the process was invalid (which it was, all the way from Bergoglio’s maneuvering with his “mafia” to the fact that an extra blank ballot turned up in the urn on the first vote when the vote went to somebody other than Bergoglio, thus making that first vote be thrown out).
Or maybe just some bureaucrat who knows the ins and outs and decides to blow the whistle...
In any case, I think we’d be in a situation of sede vacante, unless BXVI stepped forward to resume the crown (which I don’t think he would - also, he’s very frail, uses a walker and is practically under house arrest). So then the question would be who could convene the conclave and who could vote.
Is this The blog for Dallas area Catholics?
If so, I’m convinced!
Ann Barnhardt generally concurs:
Enveloped by its sickly scent...
“...Further, in this AUTHORIZED BIOGRAPHY, Danneels, who can only be described as an enthusiastic supporter of horrific sexual perversion and the slaughter of pre-born children, admits that the election of Bergoglio was organized YEARS in advance by the so-called “San Gallo Mafiaclub” for the express purpose of pushing through a hyper-radical and utterly heretical “reform” agenda centered around the ratification of perverted sex acts.
Citation from an Italian newspaper here. You can run it through googletranslate...”
bmp
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.