Posted on 09/01/2013 2:10:47 PM PDT by NYer
The other day I received a rather lengthy email from a fellow responding to a chapter in my book, Nuts and Bolts - A Practical How-To Guide for Explaining and Defending the Catholic Faith, specifically responding to my defense of calling priests "father."
Score One Up For the Protestants
I have answered this question hundreds of times over the years, but this fellow's critique caught my attention first of all because he used my own style of argumentation against me. I liked that. "Matthew 23:9," he reminded me, "says, ‘Call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.’ What would Jesus have to say to you, Tim, to get you to believe you can't call your priest 'father,' other than by saying, 'Call no man your father on earth?'"
I have to believe this fellow has heard me speak before because I have often (too often?) used a similar line, "What else would Jesus have to say..." to argue in favor of various Catholic doctrines. In fact, I used that very approach in my debate with Dr. Peter Barnes on the Eucharist in Sydney, Australia, when we were discussing John 6:53.
Cudos to my interlocutor at this point, but that would be, quite frankly, about the only round he had in his magazine.
An Earthy Argument
In Nuts and Bolts, I point out the fact that notwithstanding Jesus's words in Matthew 23, St. Paul calls people "on the earth" father in Ephesians 6:2-4:
"Honor your father and mother" (this is the first commandment with a promise), "that it may be well with you and that you may live long on the earth." Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.
Is this a contradiction?
Many will respond at this point and claim Jesus is not just condemning calling anyone father; rather, he is condemning calling religious leaders "father." As I explain in my book, this is easily dismissed when we consider the words of our Lord from Luke 16:24:
And he (the rich man) called out, "Father Abraham, have mercy upon me, and send Lazarus to dip the end of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in anguish in this flame."
Abraham is clearly a "religious leader." And Jesus is not alone in referring to him "father." St. James refers to Abraham as "father" in James 2:21, while St. Paul refers to Abraham as "father" seven times in Romans 4:1-18. If you believe in the inspiration of Sacred Scripture, St. James and St. Paul cannot contradict Jesus in Matthew 23:9.
At this point, my new friend argued something slightly different from what I've heard before. He said words to the effect of: "The key here is found in the words 'on the earth.' Abraham was not on earth. So Jesus was not simply condemning giving the 'title' of 'father' to men, but giving it to religious leaders who are on earth. And that is precisely what Catholics do!"
The Catholic Response
The first problem here is Jesus did not say "give no spiritual leader on earth the title father." He simply said, "Call no man on earth your father." More on that in a moment. For now, let's follow the argument. So now our Protestant friend is saying it is okay to call our dads "father" because they are not "spiritual leaders" in the Church. We can also call our spiritual forefathers like Abraham or Jacob (John 4:12) father because they are no longer "on earth."
Sounds okay so far, but here's the problem. In I John 2:13-14, St. John refers to the leaders of the church in Ephesus to whom he is most likely writing as "fathers" twice. And notice he gives them the title "father."
I am writing to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning. I am writing to you, young men, because you have overcome the evil one. I write to you, children, because you know the Father. I write to you, fathers, because you know him who is from the beginning…
Notice, he does not say they are "fathers" because they are married with children. They are "fathers," spiritually speaking. And they are presumably "on the earth."
In Acts 7:1-2, St. Stephen, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, calls both Abraham and the elders of Jerusalem "father" in the same breath:
And the high priest said, "Is this so?" And Stephen said: "Brethren and fathers, hear me. The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham…"
And in I Corinthians 4:14-15, St. Paul refers to himself as "father":
I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
What Does the Bible Say?
What we need to do is get back to Matthew 23:9 and let the surrounding verses clarify things for us:
(8) But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brethren. (9) And call no man your father... for you have one Father... (10) Neither be called masters, for you have one master, the Christ.
We have "one teacher," and yet, many are called “teacher” in the New Testament (see James 3:1; Ephesians 4:11, etc.). We have "one master," or leader, and yet, we have many "leaders" in the body of Christ to whom we are called to submit (Hebrews 13:17 uses the same Greek root for "leader" when it says, "Obey your leaders and submit to them...").
Ultimately, the key to understanding all of these seemingly contradictory texts is found in a proper understanding of the nature of the Body of Christ.
I am going to call upon the Douay-Rheims translation of Ephesians 3:14-15 to help me out here:
For this cause I bow my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Of whom all paternity (Gr. – paternia – “fatherhood”) in heaven and earth is named.
God, the Father, is our one true Father. All other fatherhood, be it a father "on earth," spiritual leaders in the Church, or our spiritual forefathers in heaven, participates in the Father's unique Fatherhood and represents it to us. They neither take away nor add to this one unique Fatherhood; they establish it on the earth.
The context of Matthew 23 emphasizes the sin of pride among the scribes and Pharisees. They loved to be called “teacher”, “father”, or “Rabbi," but their pride pointed men to themselves rather than to God the Father from whom they received true fatherhood and in whom their fatherhood subsisted. Outside of God the Father, there are no fathers at all in the true sense of the term. But in God, we have all sorts of true "fathers."
Ultimately, Jesus is condemning the usurpation of the fatherhood of God in Matthew's Gospel, not the proper participation in that fatherhood.
Ping!
Just love the Reason and Logic in Catholic Theology. We are so missing “Common Sense” in the world today!!! Thanks for posting.
Even if someone is not catholic, must that person call the catholic priest “father”? Or, how about a muslim imam, is that man to be called by his religious title by a non-muslim? And, if the individual refuses to call those men by their titles, what then?
One earthly father, one heavenly one.
Being as how everyone has an earthly father, it would therefore be the only logical interpretation.
Well apparently I’m good calling my dad “Old fart”.
as in....is it true Fadda, did Rocky turn chicken?
Reason number 130249 for using Douay Rheims.
Catholics aren't even the only ones to use this title. What about Episcopalian priests? Should a Catholic call an Episcopalian or Anglican priest "Father?"
“Being as how everyone has an earthly father, it would therefore be the only logical interpretation.”
I don’t see the word ‘religious leader’ anywhere in there.
I guess we should wait for the next edition of the bible to insert call no religious man on earth, father.
The truth is rather more radical.
We tend to use Reverend, which is what they call themselves to avoid confusion. Say Rev. so-and-so.
I don’t get too wound up over this sort of thing. I assume God knows the difference. I’m not even Catholic and I call priests “Father” out of basic respect the same way I call a surgeon, “Doctor”.
With Protestant ministers it varies with the individual. The minister that married my wife and I was a longtime friend so I just call him by name but my wife called him “Pastor”.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
I don’t use the term Reverend. It’s used only once in the Bible and then in reference to God.
The one Episcopal priest I knew went by “Father.” I protested to the mutual fried of ours that he wasn’t anoyone’s father, never having married. I was told to call him “Ralph.”
That’s a good question.
I would say, that if someone isn’t a Catholic, there isn’t any moral obligation to call a priest “Father”, in a technical sense. It seems to me though, in a social setting it would be rather odd and awkward if one didnt.
For example, can you imagine the scene if one is in a group of people where a priest is present, and all are engaged in polite conversation. To address the preist in said conversation would be a bit awkward to say “Mister Thomas” when everyone else is calling him “Father Thomas”.
Similarly for an Imam (should anyone find oneself in the company of Muslims and their Imam).
So for the sake of a polite conversation I’d say it should be done. And perhaps that’s why it’s good this apologetic was posted. I would hope our non-Catholic brethren could put their mind at ease about this particular topic. Even if such do not want to become Catholic.
At least, one need not worry about calling a man “father”, regardless if a person is Catholic or not.
You’re Catholic? Fwdude was asking about Catholics.
“Similarly for an Imam (should anyone find oneself in the company of Muslims and their Imam).”
I would politely excuse myself rather than eat with an Imam.
Could you please pass the ham, Mullah?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.