Skip to comments.
Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^
| July 11, 2012
| Steve Ray
Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer
Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?
A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…
Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints cant do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!
Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?
An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the dead in Christ are those saints who have physically died. For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first (1 Thess 4:16).
THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE JESUS ALONE DOCTRINE. From some peoples point of view, people who have died are classified as dead saints, who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people dont want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, JESUS ALONE fails. If the so-called dead saints do anything then it is not JESUS ALONE, but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called dead saints are in fact not dead, but alive with God.
Dead or in paradise?
HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly dead saints who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no dead saint because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants
HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says Jesus is the god of the living. However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; He is not God of the dead but of the living.
- “God told him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, (the) God of Isaac, and (the) God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead but of the living. You are greatly misled” (Mk 12: 26-27).
Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as dead saints.
Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?
WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than dead saints who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called dead saints; not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.
SORRY LEONARD
YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument. He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun (Eccles 9:6).
When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the persons soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?
How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?
Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet (Kings 13:20-21).
Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It cant be much clearer than that!
The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ
JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE DEAD SAINTS. Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.
“Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?
This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that dead saints cant do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.
So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020, 1,021-1,040 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: metmom
“He asked first.”
Just like yourself he has refused to disclose his true affiliations, when queried.
For what purpose he has concealed this, I do not know. However, I am not answering any of his further questions unless he’s willing to answer mine.
Some of the folks here are honest about answering questions rather than being deliberately evasive. You and CB are not.
So - answer my question as to which church you belong to. If you can’t provide a name then it would be good to have a number.
Every practicing protestant I know of this is a complete non-issue. So I can only conclude there is something you do not wish other Christians to know about your faith. What? I do not know.
So, if you and CB want an answer to your questions, I suggest you answer my first question - what church do you attend? If of course you do attend one.
Go ahead and answer his instead of throwing other questions out there in alleged response to his and see what happens.
Also, FR courtesy seems to be seriously lacking amongst FRoman Catholics. It’s protocol to courtesy ping someone whom you mention, especially by name, in a post.
1,001
posted on
07/17/2013 7:23:21 AM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: bkaycee
Are RC's guilty of some form of Necromancy?
No, and the weasel words "some form of" show that you know that's not the case.
To: JCBreckenridge
1. You provided no evidence in any of the 12 categories.
2. Yo provided no link between you 300 year start date and anything that ever happened previously.
3. Your last misstatement indicates you do not understand the evidence of transmission.
If you ever find actual evidence that connects the apparently CULTIC practice to Christian truth, please do ping me. I’d like to know what you find.
1,003
posted on
07/17/2013 7:29:47 AM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
( “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” - Tacitus)
To: arthurus
1. A small percentage believe departed saints are dead. Most believe that to be absent from the body is to be present with The Lord.
2. Christ - God - performed a miracle to have two Old Testament Jewish believers appear together with him. Not even close to the false practice being taught.
1,004
posted on
07/17/2013 7:33:51 AM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus)
To: aMorePerfectUnion
“2. Yo provided no link between you 300 year start date and anything that ever happened previously.”
It is in the Apostolic Creed, for which we have evidence (from the Church fathers), describing the doctrine going to around the time of Chalcedon.
Arguing that you do not like the evidence I provided is one thing (because it doesn’t fit your arbitrary rule), arguing that I provided no evidence whatsoever for the doctrine is quite another.
The strongest scriptural evidence in favor of the communion of Saints is the fact that Christ himself proclaimed (when speaking of Abraham), that God was not a God of the dead but of the living. He argued that Abraham, though he had died, was presently alive.
I see no scriptural evidence for your position that saints are dead, and in fact, I would argue that’s contrary to the hope that Jesus christ provides of eternity with Him.
1,005
posted on
07/17/2013 7:38:31 AM PDT
by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: Elsie
“Im a member of a Wesleyan congregation”
Is that the same as being a Methodist?
To: rwa265
There is a Wesleyan Church.
To: narses; xzins
Almighty Father, please heal xzins' grandson and make him whole. Send Your angels to guard him, to guide his physicians, and to Your Greater Glory, heal that child. I ask this in the Name of Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, Amen.
xzinz, may the most holy apostle, St Jude, patron saint of things almost despaired of, assist you as well.
1,008
posted on
07/17/2013 7:44:03 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: JCBreckenridge
“I see no scriptural evidence for your position that saints are dead, and in fact, I would argue thats contrary to the hope that Jesus christ provides of eternity with Him.”
On multiple posts I have been clear I do not believe this - yet you keep posting it. Please post with integrity.
1,009
posted on
07/17/2013 7:44:07 AM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus)
To: JCBreckenridge
“Arguing that you do not like the evidence I provided is one thing (because it doesnt fit your arbitrary rule), arguing that I provided no evidence whatsoever for the doctrine is quite another.
You have provided no evidence that directly connects the cultic practice with anything that was practiced by Christians for the first 300 years.
“The strongest scriptural evidence in favor of the communion of Saints is the fact that Christ himself proclaimed (when speaking of Abraham), that God was not a God of the dead but of the living. He argued that Abraham, though he had died, was presently alive.
That saints are alive is a separate issue from whether they can hear you, whether they pray for you or whether you should pray to them. Each of those issues is an argument from silence that you have not supported.
Each time you shift to change the discussion. Post with integrity if you are a Christian please. If you are not, it is pointless to interact with you.
1,010
posted on
07/17/2013 7:48:43 AM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus)
To: verga; metmom
YOU'RE BLACKMay I suggest Verga, that you consider bringing your cookware into the 21st century?
Sears, potandpan-kitchen-cookware.blogspot.com/ & all kinds of online sources mentions multi-colored cookware...
And guess what, it's been around for over 80 years:
Even Pots and Pans Have Their Fashions in Colors (The Milwaukee Sentinel, Feb. 2, 1932)
And ceramic cookware's been around as black alternatives as well.
So, no...your cliche is just that. (And may not match reality)
To: NYer
WOW >1000 posts on this thread! How have I missed it? Thanks for the thread. Very inspiring, and educational!
1,012
posted on
07/17/2013 8:14:02 AM PDT
by
TEXOKIE
(We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
To: JCBreckenridge
Jesus passed authority to St. Peter and the Apostles - the power to bind and loose, the power to forgive sinsDerived authority allows people to exercise such authority...the power to bind and loose, the power to forgive sins.
It doesn't mean that the One from whom such authority is derived ever lost it.
Likewise, Paul twice references Jesus as THE Head of the Church.
No undivinated man is the head of the Church; Jesus never abdicated that role. He is STILL Head of the church.
To: narses; xzins
Am praying with you about your 3 yr old grandson.
May the Good Lord intercede and let him remain in his body with full healing, according to His Will. Amen
1,014
posted on
07/17/2013 8:16:06 AM PDT
by
TEXOKIE
(We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
To: metmom
Great stuff in your comment. Thank you!
Here is something else I found in the official catechism of the Roman church. After reading this, any Bible-believing God-fearing man should run as fast from Rome as possible. All other Roman blasphemies aside, this should tell you all you need to know about this pontiff and the institution he heads.
Paragraph 882 reads as follows: “The Pope, Bishop of Rome and Peter’s successor, “is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful.” “For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise unhindered.”
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2A.HTM
Let’s compare #882 from the catechism to Scripture.
“And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.” (Matthew 28:18)
So, in the wake of His resurrection, the Bible tells us that Jesus claimed to hold ALL power in heaven and in earth. That doesn’t seem to square with the claim of papal power found in paragraph 882.
Let’s look further:
Ephesians 1:20-23
20 Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places,
21 Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church,
23 Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
God the Father put ALL things under the feet of Jesus Christ, and gave Jesus Christ to be the head over ALL things to the church, which is His body! Hmmm, that doesn’t seem to square with the papal claim either.
Here is another papal claim from the official catechism:
Paragraph 937 says, “The Pope enjoys, by divine institution, “supreme, full, immediate, and universal power in the care of souls”
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2A.HTM
Christ claimed He had been given all power, but Rome says that power is in the hands of the pope. WOW!
To: RegulatorCountry
Thanks for the information. My Mom and sister are Methodist, but I wasn’t aware that there was a separate Wesleyan Church.
On a different note, I saw the history of North Carolina on your About page. My family spent a week in Atlantic Beach over the July 4th holiday. We went to Ft. Macon and Beaufort, and found the visits to be very interesting and informative. On the way home, we ate lunch in New Bern and stopped at the visitors center at Tryon Palace. My wife learned that one of her favorite authors lives in New Bern. It was a wonderful vacation and I hope we can do it again.
To: Colofornian; CynicalBear
The Psalms that are written as prayers are actually prophecies. Psalm 83 will soon show you that if you doubt it.
1,017
posted on
07/17/2013 8:40:17 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: JCBreckenridge; metmom
Salvation is through a person, not a church. Gonna need a quote for this.Mat 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Mat 11:29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
Mat 11:30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
It's sad to see there are so many who think there's a back door to heaven...
For those of us who the 'book' is the final authority, there's no doubt whatsoever that salvation is thru the person of Jesus Christ, alone...
Those who refuse to acknowledge that don't spend much or any time with God in his scriptures...
To: metmom
Even though this point has been raised ad nauseum on this thread (I’m sure) and elsewhere, I simply can’t resist asking you the following question: do you not see any value at ALL in intercessory prayer, or do you only do it because the Bible tells you to pray for others?
I ask because I honestly can’t believe you just wrote the following:
“’Hey, so and so, ask God for me.....’
“What an appalling lack of trust in God to do what is right and lack of faith in the promises Jesus made about prayer and the Father.”
Now I’m going to guess you will say something like: “Of course I’ll ask someone ALIVE to pray for me” or “the people in heaven can’t hear your requests for intercessory prayer”, or something like THAT, which will just go to prove conclusively what I claimed in the post of mine to which you offered a reply.
Note: that’s a GUESS as to what you aware going to reply back to me. I can’t know for SURE since I can’t read minds. But I’m pretty sure I’m right. :).
To: rwa265
New Bern is old too, once a colonial capital. Settled by Swiss (hence the name), the town has a beautiful heraldic flag with a bear on it, that’s the symbol of New Bern.
If you like shipwrecks and pirates, as well as Civil War and WWII history, you’d enjoy Ocracoke Island and Hatteras Island on the Outer Banks. Ocracoke is only reachable by ferry, private boat or small plane. Blackbeard hung out there and was executed there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020, 1,021-1,040 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson