Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt's Mormon Army: How It Works
BuzzFeed ^ | February 3, 2012 | McKay Coppins

Posted on 02/04/2012 6:53:17 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Very, very good e-mail lists — and an internal debate over whether to use them. “I'm getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve,” writes one young Mormon.

LAS VEGAS, Nevada -- At Mitt Romney’s first rally here earlier this week, there were plenty of hints that the enthusiastic crowd of 1,000 was stacked with Mormons. Kids walked around in BYU sweatshirts, moms chatted about LDS youth groups, and at least one supporter was overheard talking about making phone calls for the candidate as part of "family home evening" -- a weekly family night the church encourages its members to hold.

But while it's no secret that Romney's coreligionists have swelled the ranks at campaign stops from Des Moines to Reno, one question about the Mormon vote has gone largely unanswered this primary season: How, exactly, have they gotten so organized?

"We heard about it from some friends in our [LDS] ward," said one woman standing outside a rally held in a Las Vegas hotel supply warehouse. "We're so glad we could make it." Another Mormon standing nearby chimed in, "Everyone we know is voting for Mitt!"

The secret to the grassroots success lies, in part, in the unique national structure and scrupulous record-keeping of the Utah-headquartered Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. While the church itself is politically neutral, it contains the structural groundwork for one of the most organized and effective voting blocs in the country—something Romney is poised to capitalize on.

Here’s how it works

In contrast with most other religions in the country, the Mormon Church is nationally organized in a strict, top-down fashion, like a corporation. Every congregation in the U.S. reports back to church headquarters in Salt Lake. Whenever an individual is baptized -- either as a child or as a convert -- local ministers take down the person’s name, address, phone number, and e-mail address, and feed the information into a national database maintained by officials in Salt Lake (and only accessible to certain church leaders).

From there, the individuals are assigned to geographically-determined congregations -- or “wards” -- of about 200-300, which they attend on Sundays. Their contact information is filtered into a local “ward list,” which is distributed to all local congregants for planning purposes--from coordinating Sunday school, to working out the logistics for church barbeques.

For decades, these ward lists were printed out and distributed after Sunday services, but in recent years the system has migrated online to LDS.org, where Mormons create logins to access the contact information for every fellow believer in the area.

For active Mormons, wards often become the center of their social universe: it’s not uncommon for members to visit their local chapels three or four times a week for various activities and meetings. Additionally, Mormons participate in “home and visiting teaching” programs, which require them to visit certain ward members on a monthly basis. In this context, ward lists become invaluable tools for Mormons’ daily life—inevitably finding their way into Google groups, listservs, and cell phones.

They also frequently become political tools.

Working the wards

The church expressly forbids using these directories for non-religious purposes, but that doesn’t deter many politically active Mormons from working their ward lists to get out the vote. Reports abound of members blasting out congregational e-mails soliciting support for partisan causes and candidates. One Southern California ward received several e-mails urging congregants to vote for an LDS politician running for local office. And in nastier example of the practice, ward lists in Alpine, Utah were used to spread an anonymous smear campaign against a candidate on the eve of a local election.

Several Mormons told BuzzFeed that as the 2012 primaries heated up, they started to see their fellow congregants use ward lists to organize local efforts for Romney.

Here in Nevada, Ryan Erwin, a consultant for the Romney campaign, acknowledged that the candidate has benefitted from grassroots efforts by Latter-day Saints, and said the campaign is proud of their support. But he also thinks the Mormon factor has been overstated.

“Mormons make up seven percent of the population here,” Erwin said. “If you read some of the reports in the media, you’d think it was 90 percent… it’s a little aggravating when you’ve worked for months to build up an organization and then they say, ‘Well, he just won it because he’s a Mormon.’”

That said, exit polls in 2008 showed that about 25 percent of Nevada caucus-goers self-identified as Mormon -- and Romney won that primary handily. This time around, polling indicates that he’s headed for a similarly dominant victory, and if it happens, local Latter-day Saints will no doubt deserve a chunk of the credit.

Much like how Iowa’s Christian home-school vote advanced its own grassroots efforts for Mike Huckabee largely independently of his campaign, there’s no evidence that Team Romney is officially coordinating with Mormon congregations. But anecdotal evidence suggests that a highly motivated base of Mormon supporters has effectively taken advantage of the LDS infrastructure to help Romney.

The Colonial First Ward listserv

One of the most illustrative examples is the Colonial First Ward listserv, which consists of more than 3,500 D.C.-area Mormons, many of them young and single.

E-mails obtained by BuzzFeed show the listserv being used frequently as a recruiting tool for Romney supporters -- gathering signatures to get the candidate on the Delaware ballot, requesting volunteers to aid the campaign’s Illinois operation, and organizing a get-out-the-vote trip to South Carolina on the weekend of the primary.

The fruits of that last effort were obvious on the ground in Columbia, S.C., where dozens of young Mormon students from Virginia and D.C. were found rallying for Romney at various campaign stops.

But not everyone on the listserv has looked kindly upon efforts to transform the network into a booster club for Romney, and a number of members have e-mailed complaints.

Matt Larsen, a member of the listserv, wrote last October: “I know I’m probably going to make enemies here, but I’m getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve. The disclaimer at the bottom of every list serve email states very clearly: ‘Items that will not be posted/that will be removed include: promoting your business, promoting political ideologies, and inflammatory comments and rhetoric.’”

The protests appear to have been ignored though, with members continuing to send out e-mails as recently as last month that requested volunteer help for Romney.

“The Colonial First Ward listserv seems to be a miraculous pro-Romney organizing tool,” grumbled one D.C.-area Mormon, who is a Democrat. “Whenever you get the contact information for 3,540 young Mormons in one place, I guess it has to be.”


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion; Other Christian; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: bow2romney; inman; lockstep4romney; mittsmormons; mormonism; mormons; nevada; obeytherino; romney; romney4king; romneyfakecrowds; romneyfakepolls; romneyslegion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 541-556 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

when anyone applies for a state job in parts of Utah, their ward records are checked. If there is no ward membership, the position is already filled, I’m sorry. This is a very slick way to get around any right-to-work or fair-hiring laws. I know. Because my husband (Catholic) tried repeatedly to get work in Utah. Same story everywhere. (of course, this was in the nineties...


221 posted on 02/04/2012 1:09:39 PM PST by redhead (, , , comedian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Oh, Ok, I shouldn’t have said you were a jilted “sister bride” to Mitt either. I apologize.


222 posted on 02/04/2012 1:10:19 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer; little jeremiah
Ok you said:

The Constitution says any American can vote or not vote for anyone they wish based on any criteria they wish.

Then promptly said:

It is abject stupidity to say “Don’t vote for Romney because he is LDS”

I have an idea make up your damn mind.

Which is it?

An American can vote or not vote or anyone they wish based on ANY criteris they wish.

OR

It is abject stupidity to say “Don’t vote for Romney because he is LDS

223 posted on 02/04/2012 1:10:19 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; RFEngineer
I wrote: Here's one you overlooked:

You replied: "Not over looked; but chosen not to post. For RFE has sensory overload if I post TOO much stuff."

You shouldn't have worried about that, I only addressed it to you, not him. :)

224 posted on 02/04/2012 1:11:36 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“make up your damn mind.”

What you do in the voting booth is up to you. It may be stupid or not, but it doesn’t matter because it’s nobody’s business but yours.

What you say in a public forum - when it’s “Vote only for candidates of the right religion” - is complete idiocy -
both for believing it, and for saying it.

But you are, of course, free to believe and say what you want regardless of it’s ignorant content.


225 posted on 02/04/2012 1:13:54 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

LOL bttt


226 posted on 02/04/2012 1:15:08 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

These GARMENTS (official name) are worn next to the skin. Underwear like bras and panties go over the garments. (at least, that’s how it used to be...) A Bishop is the “pastor” of a ward, a relatively low-level place in the heirarchy, as opposed to Apostle, or Council of 12, for instance. There are NO archbishops in the Mormon church. They do not use honorific titles like “Reverend” or “Right Reverend.”


227 posted on 02/04/2012 1:16:21 PM PST by redhead (, , , comedian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

LOL bttt


228 posted on 02/04/2012 1:17:01 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Amen!!!Amen!!!Amen!!!Amen!!!


229 posted on 02/04/2012 1:17:41 PM PST by StPaulRevert (Go Newt!!! 2012 The battle for America's Souls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

ROTFLOL!


230 posted on 02/04/2012 1:20:32 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Can’t have a decent honest discussion with jello made from slug slime...


231 posted on 02/04/2012 1:21:47 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Starting to wonder if you wonder if you really aren’t lds as you keep answering questions that have not been asked and changing the subject.
A+ on that.


232 posted on 02/04/2012 1:22:22 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

good to see that you missed my point entirely...I’ll dumb it down next time for you.


233 posted on 02/04/2012 1:22:33 PM PST by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

I asked a very simple question.

You refuse to answer simple questions.


234 posted on 02/04/2012 1:23:35 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: AnTiw1

And since Romney’s positions are very little different from 0bomma’s, you’re proven right already.


235 posted on 02/04/2012 1:25:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Starting to wonder if you wonder if you really aren’t lds “

Far be it for me to talk you out of your own personal paranoia.

The peep stone gave me that one, by the way.


236 posted on 02/04/2012 1:25:52 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
"What you do in the voting booth is up to you. It may be stupid or not, but it doesn’t matter because it’s nobody’s business but yours. What you say in a public forum - when it’s “Vote only for candidates of the right religion” - is complete idiocy - both for believing it, and for saying it. But you are, of course, free to believe and say what you want regardless of it’s ignorant content."

Let's not be too hard on her, she may be IMPAIRED again. :)

237 posted on 02/04/2012 1:25:52 PM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Ouch.


238 posted on 02/04/2012 1:27:52 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: svcw

That is an lds tactic


239 posted on 02/04/2012 1:28:16 PM PST by StPaulRevert (Go Newt!!! 2012 The battle for America's Souls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Again, answering a question that wasn’t asked.
Show me where I said what you are accusing me of: (you stated)“Vote only for candidates of the right religion”.
I did say Romney is who he is BECAUSE he is mormon not in spite of it.
And I did say I was not voting for him, because he is a stink’n liberal and there is not a dimes worth of difference between him and BHO.


240 posted on 02/04/2012 1:29:47 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 541-556 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson