Posted on 09/08/2011 10:42:09 PM PDT by Cronos
The diminutive songstress who played a high school dropout on Glee and originated the role of Glinda in Wicked is just as comfortable talking about her Christian faith as she is her support for gay rights.
In a recent interview with The Advocate, she explained how she can hold both dear to her heart.
I read my Bible and I pray and all of that. I really do, she told the gay-interest publication. But at the same time, I dont think being gay is a sin. Period.
Chenoweth, 43, who grew up in Oklahomas Bible belt, cited her grandmother as inspiration.
....Asked how she would respond to people who cite their Christian beliefs as the basis for discrimination against gays, she said with a laugh, I would ask, What would Jesus do? It sounds so cliché and Pollyannaish, but I have a feeling if he were on the earth today, he wouldnt be walking around saying, Youre going to hell and Youre wrong, youre wrong, youre wrong. I think hed be accepting and loving.
Using her tiny stature as an example, she said, What would I do if it was a sin to be short? Thats the way God made me, so what could I do? Lets see, I could wear heels, I could tease my hair, and maybe on a good day I could be 51″. But the bottom line is, Im 411″ and thats the way I was put together. And thats what I believe about homosexuals.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
1. Glee = homosexual show
2. chinese menue christianity is not christianity.
1. Glee = homosexual show
2. chinese menue christianity is not christianity.
Very sad indeed when a self-proclaimed Bible reader and prayer-er set aside Biblical standards for the love of money.
She knows absolutely it is a sin and she now gets to endure the guilt of having forsaken the Lord before men. I know she can repent and be restored but at what cost to her while she carries this load of guilt and shame? I trust she will not attempt the common practice of hiding the guilt with substances.
As I understand it, there are two basic legitimate kinds of marriage, and they are Natural Marriage, and Sacramental Marriage (Matrimony).
Natural marriage is something every known society recognizes, in every century and in every culture, whether it is religious or not, whether there are legal regulations or not, and is rooted in Natural Law. This means, it's what we know is best for human flourishing. Natural marriage involves the realization that
Then there's Sacramental Marriage (Matrimony), which is like Natural Marriage but taken to a higher level. Matrimony includes all of the above points, plus:
To put that a different way: the State can (and should) acnowledge marriage as an institution; but the State is not the source of marriage, cannot define (or redefine) marriage, and must not degrade or impede marriage, because marriage is the more fundamental institution. Marriage is prior to the State, more essential to human well-being than the State, and could even be said to be superior to the State.
Is that 'bout right?
Yogi is gonna be real sore if he snitches this one’s picnic basket. It is empty.
Comments like this are why I love Free Republic.
You got it as far as I know!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.