Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kristin Chenoweth: Christian and Gay Rights Supporter
ABC ^ | 8 Sep 2011 | Luchina Fisher

Posted on 09/08/2011 10:42:09 PM PDT by Cronos

The diminutive songstress who played a high school dropout on “Glee” and originated the role of Glinda in “Wicked” is just as comfortable talking about her Christian faith as she is her support for gay rights.

In a recent interview with The Advocate, she explained how she can hold both dear to her heart.

“I read my Bible and I pray and all of that. I really do,” she told the gay-interest publication. “But at the same time, I don’t think being gay is a sin. Period.”

Chenoweth, 43, who grew up in Oklahoma’s Bible belt, cited her grandmother as inspiration.

....Asked how she would respond to people who cite their Christian beliefs as the basis for discrimination against gays, she said with a laugh, “I would ask, ‘What would Jesus do?’ It sounds so cliché and Pollyannaish, but I have a feeling if he were on the earth today, he wouldn’t be walking around saying, “You’re going to hell” and “You’re wrong, you’re wrong, you’re wrong.” I think he’d be accepting and loving.”

Using her tiny stature as an example, she said, “What would I do if it was a sin to be short? That’s the way God made me, so what could I do? Let’s see, I could wear heels, I could tease my hair, and maybe on a good day I could be 5’1″. But the bottom line is, I’m 4’11″ and that’s the way I was put together. And that’s what I believe about homosexuals.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: abomination; homosexualagenda; indiscriminate; presbyterian; psuedochristian; queer; sodomite; undiscerning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Cronos

What I find interesting is when anyone(usually someone in the entertainment industry) seems to think he or she can say something along the lines of “I’ve decided such and such activity(usually involving sex) is not a sin.” That makes about as much sense as someone saying “I’ve decided I’ve got 900 billion dollars tax free in my bank account” when in reality he has only 37 cents in it.

God alone, not man, makes the decision about whether something is sinful or not. I’ll take His word revealed in the Holy Bible over the words of some flavor of the month celebrity that I’ve never even heard of before.


21 posted on 09/08/2011 11:56:37 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

What would Jesus do? He would probably say the same thing to gays that he said to the woman caught in adultery: “Sin no more.” Kristin probably skipped this passage in the bible.


22 posted on 09/09/2011 12:07:11 AM PDT by dupree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Another “Christianity is what I want it to be” psuedo-Christian heard from.


23 posted on 09/09/2011 12:20:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dupree
Re: 22 Amen to that.
"Go and sin no more."
Not: Go and carry on in your sin.

We are all sinners saved by.Grace; but if we love the Lord we are going to want to serve Him and obey Him.
We may occasionally stumble, but not continually wallow in sin. The Holy Spirit will ping our conscience and help pull us out of the mire.

24 posted on 09/09/2011 12:21:47 AM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: paudio

All sex outside of marriage between a man and a woman is sin.

Period.


25 posted on 09/09/2011 1:24:05 AM PDT by BwanaNdege (“Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address” - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paudio
what Freepers think on having sex outside the marriage.

well, I can't speak for all, but us conservative Catholic freepers here believe that:

  1. Extra-marital sex is wrong and a sin, full stop.
  2. "Shacking up", "living together", "free for all szx" is wrong and a sin
  3. "Bed jumping" is a sin
  4. "Easy, no fault divorce" making it divorce first, talk later is wrong and leads to the devaluation of marriage
  5. treating marriage as just a contract or a partnership or just companionship is incorrect -- Marriage is a sacrament a union of God with man and woman -- God is in the midst of this, hence cheating on your spouse is being disobedient to God, hence living together is cutting out God, etc.

26 posted on 09/09/2011 1:32:44 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paudio
I'm just wondering how many Freepers actually do it.

I doubt you'd get many clamoring to answer that! But there are many freepers who condone pre-marital sex and "live-in relationships" -- they are a product of this society.

Speaking for myself, no I haven't. Would I have done this when in my early 20s I was agnostic at best? Probably yes, but didn't get the opportunity -- at times the opportunity just slipped away and at other times I "didn't get it" -- now I believe it was God giving me a helping hand at a time I was weak. Then, I just thought I was a nerd!

Since I've been married I have no such intentions -- not because I'm "better than" most people -- I'd say I'm about average in getting tempted, but thanks to God's grace I don't act on it -- I really do honestly, deep down, believe that marriage is a Sacrament, a duty, a Holy call, a vocation. To me to cheat on my spouse is more than just cheating on her, it is sinning against God by rejecting Him.

I think the problem in our society stems from us accepting this change in morality from "marriage is a Holy Sacrament" to "it's just sex, preventable or gay or whatever"

Imho, the way in which we have devalued marriage has made "gay marriage" acceptable -- if it's just a contract, big deal, eh?

27 posted on 09/09/2011 1:40:26 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
I’ll take His word revealed in the Holy Bible over the words of some flavor of the month celebrity that I’ve never even heard of before

the problem is that these celebrities, etc. use their own interpretations of the Holy Bible to justify what they want.

28 posted on 09/09/2011 1:41:41 AM PDT by Cronos (www.forfiter.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Indeed I do not think the Bible makes a ceremony mandatory.

These are not new questions at all. The reason is that questions about rights of married persons and hereditary rights of their children probably pre-date any recorded history.

I’ve read entries about marriage in many of the legal dictionaries and NONE of them say a ceremony is required. In fact, a ceremony can be performed, but in most cases the marriage STILL does not exist until it is consummated.

Here are a few of the things that courts might look at:

Are they living together as man and wife?
Have they made an open declaration of their intent to marry?
Have they consummated the union?
Are there offspring involved?
Has she taken his name or he taken her name?
Have they, as a couple, acquired property in both their names?

Now once again none of the above taken by itself is considered conclusive. But these ideas and this same concept is recognized in every society that exists or has ever existed worldwide.

Anderson’s Dictionary of Law calls it the oldest and most important transaction in life, the basis of the fabric of all civilized society.

NONE of the law dictionary entries I have ever read define marriage as being anything else than a relation between a man and a woman, who openly chose to and consent to a perpetual union.


29 posted on 09/09/2011 2:05:10 AM PDT by djf (One of the few FReepers who NEVER clicked the "dead weasel" thread!! But may not last much longer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil.

You can't have it both ways.

30 posted on 09/09/2011 3:29:11 AM PDT by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I had no idea she was so short.

I saw her in “The Apple Tree,” revival and she was deeply annoying. One of those really modern Broadway belts that make me throw my hands over my ears.

Learn how to be a better performer instead of giving interviews to the Advocate!


31 posted on 09/09/2011 3:39:40 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Run, Sarah, Run! Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dupree

You are absolutely correct. Jesus would tell them to stop engaging in a sexual relationship, and He would call it sin.

Society ignores the importance of holiness these days, but Jesus never forgot it. “Be holy, as I am holy.”
The only sexual relationship God has called holy is a marriage between one man and one woman.
We are all called to live celibate lives if we are not married, without exception.
God hates sin. He hates it. And when we ask Him to overlook our sin, we make Him an accesory to the sin He hates.
I am very sorry to see Ms. Chenoweth join the overlookers for the sake of a Hollywood career.


32 posted on 09/09/2011 3:53:59 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: paudio

“...sex outside the marriage. Does the Bible condone it?...”

IF you believe God and that HE is the author of the Bible, there is NO way that you can see sex outside of marriage, between one man and one woman, as anything but sin.

Today’s culture has negated the notion of sin....because many people today are afraid of REAL change and REAL Love.

Sad...

(Personally, I see far too much emphasis placed on disordered homosexual sex. Heterosexuals are just as guilty of misusing this wonderful gift that God gave us.)


33 posted on 09/09/2011 5:04:20 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
“I read my Bible and I pray and all of that. I really do,” she told the gay-interest publication.

The "all of that" is belittling beyond telling. No Christian is she. She has no clue about the very basic truths of the faith.

34 posted on 09/09/2011 5:04:44 AM PDT by fwdude ("When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Well, Jesus loved enough to seek to save people from their sins. Yes, there are behaviors that are harmful and self-destructive upon those who practice them, and honestly it is a Christian duty to encourage people not to practice certain behaviors, of which sodomy is one.


35 posted on 09/09/2011 6:41:17 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

This lost girl is beguiled—There is NO credible evidence that God ever Created anybody homosexual. Her comparison of a genetic trait to an orientation is so uneducated she is either willfully blind and Stupid—or ? she clearly is not an obediant Christian.


36 posted on 09/09/2011 8:01:31 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

“Did God really say....?”


37 posted on 09/09/2011 8:09:05 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

It’s not just celebrities, sadly.


38 posted on 09/09/2011 8:31:17 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
“I read my Bible and I pray and all of that. I really do,” she told the gay-interest publication. “But at the same time, I don’t think being gay is a sin. Period.”

If she's actually read her bible like she claims, then she knows that being tempted is not a sin, but acting on said temptation IS a sin.

But of course, she'd never say that because it isn't "cool".

39 posted on 09/09/2011 9:19:16 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Does the Bible condone it?

Nope. It's called fornication and is a sin.

40 posted on 09/09/2011 9:20:59 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson