Posted on 12/01/2010 7:50:12 AM PST by ImProudToBeAnAmerican
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness…So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” (Genesis 1:26a, 17 KJV)
According to the Theory of Evolution, man evolved from primates about 5 million years ago. In high school biology class we were taught about fossils and science’s search for the “missing link,” the point where apes became human. However, it’s been 120 years since Darwin penned his theory, and the fossil record – which is now fairly complete – has yet to produce one example of a transition from one species to another.1...
Excerpt of third in a series on articles on Creation - shared for your review and comments.
Enjoy!
(Excerpt) Read more at inspiretomorrow.wordpress.com ...
According to the Theory of Evolution, man evolved from primates about 5 million years ago. In high school biology class we were taught about fossils and science’s search for the “missing link,” the point where apes became human. However, it’s been 120 years since Darwin penned his theory, and the fossil record – which is now fairly complete – has yet to produce one example of a transition from one species to another.1
In 1974, a partial skeleton was found in Ethiopia which scientists determined was the oldest hominid. Classified as Australopithecus afarensis and nick-named “Lucy,” this specimen was considered the ancestor of all humans and the ideal “transitional fossil” between apes and man. However, in 2007, after further analysis of “Lucy’s” jawbone, Israeli scientists have concluded that “Lucy” is not a human ancestor, but rather is an ancestor of other primates, most likely the gorilla.2
While the search for the elusive “missing link” continues, molecular biologists are delving into the secrets of the human cell. The most powerful testament to the existence of an Intelligent Designer is the very thing that makes us who we are – our DNA. If the DNA in one human cell were connected and stretched out, it would be about seven feet long. If all the DNA in the human body were stretched end to end, it would reach to the moon over a half million times! Yet, if one copy of the DNA of every person who has ever lived were put together, it would weigh less than an aspirin.3
DNA is not only a spectacular feat of divine engineering; it also holds clues to the age of mankind. In 2008, a new genome project was undertaken in order to determine which genetic mutations cause disease. By knowing the number of mutations that occur in each generation, scientists can track diseases they may cause. Their pilot study results showed approximately 60 mutations per generation. A genetic computer program has used those results to simulate the accumulation of generations of these mutations, and the conclusion was that mankind would be extinct in 350 generations. In 6,000 years of Biblical history, there have been only 300 generations.4 In addition, by studying mitochondrial DNA (that which is passed from mother to child), scientists have the data to try to determine when “Eve” lived. The best data available has Mitochondrial Eve about the same age as the historical Eve of the Bible.5
Romans 1:20 says that the created things around us reveal the Creator. His ultimate creation is man. The complexity and individuality of every human being, from our personality and appearance to the hidden helixes of our DNA, did not evolve from apes. Rather, we are “fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalms 139:14 KJV) in the image of God Himself.
Full article - see online article for sources/footnotes.
Thanks
Very interesting article!
Thanks for posting!
True science and true relgion are one and the same in answering the basic questions.
The one question we always must ask: Are you a man or an animal? The resultant answer answers the rest of the philosophical gibberish.
Man is not an animal (although we certainly can act much like them, even worse as we have very few limits of imagination and therefore ability to build).
World view sets the stage for all discussion, scientific, political, theological etc.
Best;
Man did not evolve “from” a primate. Man IS a primate. We not only have fossils that detail the transition of one species to another, we have OBSERVED one species change into another. Lucy is still thought to be an ancestor of humans, nor are Australopithocine the only non human but human like primates that Creationists have to explain away.
DNA studies have shown that the human species, while very young, is at least 100,000 years old. Moreover any objective study of our DNA shows the pattern of common ancestry that can be used to determine that Native Americans are Asiatic not Semitic (for example) and also show that we separated from our most recent common ancestry with a chimpanzee about 5-6 million years ago, and that of all living primates - humans and chimps are closer to each other than either is to any other primate.
As usual, when Creationists discuss scientific data, they lie about it.
The clues to understanding the way in which man is made in the image of God can be found in the conversation Moses had with God at the burning bush....”I AM that I AM”...”tell the people I AM has sent you”.
Humans use the phrase “I” almost without thinking about it...”I am...I will...I feel....I think...I exist” and so on ad infinitum. We aren’t just made in the image of God; the way we think, live, perceive, and each of us having a sense of self apartness from other selves is but a pale reflection of God as he experiences his own internal thought processes and inner order. I can feel pain and it registers as unpleasant....but I can only dimly imagine how God experienced pain as he hung there in flesh upon the cross.
the fossil record is not fairly complete.
I-LOVE-this-stuff ping :-)
Whenever I hear million, billions or trillions of years in regard to any historical reference to the earth or mankind I know what direction it is coming from. Good article. Man continues to seek to be as God, who is “from everlasting to everlasting”.
Man was created in the image of God in the sense that Man is the only creature on Earth - or the universe beyond as far as we know - able to abstract information from his environment. Without this ability, we´d be no more unique than any other animal.
Sadly those who believe what God says about the origin of the universe and our own origins are characterized as stupid, blind, and lacking intellectual insight. But many do question the assumptions of evolution and oppose the blind faith so many have in a process that has no more scientific proof than creation.
So is there a man who disproved evolution? Could that be true? Yes, it is true. His name is Dr. John Sanford of Cornell University. Sanford is the author of more than 80 scientific publications and has been granted more than 30 patents dealing with genetics. He was largely responsible for creating the “gene gun” used for genetic engineering technology. Sanford has been twice awarded the Distinguished Inventor Award by the Central New York Patent Law Association, in 1990 and again in 1995.
Sanford presented a lecture on his findings at Bethany Lutheran College in April 2009. In that presentation Sanford explained that the known mechanisms of genetics demonstrate that the central axiom of Darwinian evolution cannot be true. Since Darwinism is a primary building block of much of the postmodern’s disdain for any truth, this means that postmodernism is discredited as well.
The central feature of Darwinism is the view that by means of genetic errors—called mutations—new and advanced forms of life were created. These new forms of life are said to have brought forth in time the changes in life that comprise the profound journey from a single cell to modern human beings.
Sanford explained, however, that Charles Darwin knew virtually nothing about genetics. As a consequence he could articulate a scientific hypothesis that at that time might have seemed reasonable but that today should be recognized as impossible.
Do genetic mutations occur? Yes, they do. Can they be beneficial? Yes, they can. So why can’t life gradually evolve as a result of such mutations? The reason they can’t, says Sanford, is because the genetic mutations need to be, on balance, beneficial to the organism. Most mutations are damaging, not helpful. Only one mutation in a million is actually beneficial to the organism, says Sanford.
I hear arguments from both sides; old earth, young earth, No transitional species in the fossil record, transitional species are evident in the fossil record, etc., etc. I am looking for empirical evidence that shows one species evolving into another AND also explains where life came from. When that happens, I can accept evolution as science.
How about a single theory that explains the universal gravitational attraction of mass AND explains where mass comes from.
Until that happens you are not going to accept the theory of gravity as science?
Evolution asks you to believe that life formed itself out of some primordial goo with no outside influence. Evolutionists accept this on faith, because they can't answer where life came from. And I am supposed to accept that as settled science? How do our approaches differ?
I can prove that if you take ten colonies of bacteria and subject them to different stresses, you will make stress resistant bacterial strains for all ten different stresses you care to subject them to.
Am I supposed to accept as settled science that mass was spoken into existence from nothing? No. Because there is nothing scientific about such a position.
Exactly...It’s faith, so don’t ask me to accept evolution as settled science either when the fundemental question of where life comes from is taken on faith.
But if nobody has a good theory for the creation of mass from nothing, gravity isn't “settled science”?
Please try to keep up here.
The theory of evolution has no more to do with how life originated than the theory of gravity has to do with how mass originated.
Follow?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.