Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Hawking Takes on Isaac Newton; Christians Respond
The Christian Post ^ | September 5, 2010 | Eric Young

Posted on 09/06/2010 2:45:06 PM PDT by wmfights

Newton, who left enduring legacies in mathematics and the natural sciences, had centuries ago warned against using the law of gravity - which he discovered - to view the universe as a mere machine, like a great clock.

“Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that is or can be done,” the 17th century scientist and non-Trinitarian Anglican stated.

“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent Being,” he added.

Hawking, however, says “the universe can and will create itself from nothing” because there is a law such as gravity.

"Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,” he writes in his soon-to-be-released book, The Grand Design. “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper (fuse) and set the universe going."

(Excerpt) Read more at christianpost.com ...


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: faith; newton; scepticism; science; scientism; stephenhawking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: All

Undermined himself with the title:

“The Grand Design”

/facepalm


41 posted on 09/06/2010 4:25:45 PM PDT by barnicus (http://jesuschristisgod.webs.com/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
I pray he does but let's face it, Hawking is a brilliant man who is very close to death. He will most likely find out very shortly that he was dead wrong for eternity.
42 posted on 09/06/2010 4:36:37 PM PDT by scottiemom ("As a Texas public school teacher, I would highly recommend private school")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Hawking is a Tool.


43 posted on 09/06/2010 4:39:05 PM PDT by Eddie01 (All we every really knew was it was crazy to be doin' it any other way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Look, you people are getting caught up with semantic differentials. Energy is "something"; matter is "something"; laws (and fields) are "something". You can convert energy to matter, and matter to energy. With particles popping up out of the vacuum all the time, gravity is not just on its own.

The Universe may well "self-assemble" because of the existence of the laws.

44 posted on 09/06/2010 4:46:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

The “Big Bang” is not discredited ~ maybe measured with more precision, and maybe we don’t quite understand the scale of the totality of the universe, but what we call the “Big Bang” is still there ~ just as it was described in Genesis.


45 posted on 09/06/2010 4:48:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

You mean “First there was nothing ... then it exploded” isnt true?


46 posted on 09/06/2010 5:21:54 PM PDT by dartuser ("Palin 2012 ... nothing else will do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
One of the reasons why Hawking doesn't get it:

In Western culture the Old Testament contains the idea of providential design, but the traditional Christian viewpoint was also greatly influenced by Aristotle, who believed "in an intelligent natural world that functions according to some deliberate design."

In every culture, the Old Testament contains the idea of providential design. It's called Genesis 1. Amateur. He ought to stick to science.

47 posted on 09/06/2010 5:52:15 PM PDT by naturalized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROTB; jjotto; papabrody; blasater1960

Meet some friends of mine.


48 posted on 09/06/2010 5:53:23 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Zokhrenu lechayyim Melekh chafetz bachayyim; vekhotvenu beSefer HaChayyim lema`ankha 'Eloqim Chayyim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

He’s angry at God for what he sees as trapping him in that body, imho. Railing and raging that he doesn’t believe out of sheer venom and spite. So much energy expended upon a nonbelief? No, he believes but denies.


49 posted on 09/06/2010 5:58:29 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

additional: archival:
50 posted on 09/06/2010 7:24:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; betty boop
Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

I bet they wish they never debunked the steady state theory.

So very true.

I recently posted a relevant reply but rather than repeating it, here's the link if you're interested.

51 posted on 09/06/2010 8:19:51 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The “Big Bang” is not described in Genesis 1:1.


52 posted on 09/06/2010 8:57:18 PM PDT by LiteKeeper ("Psalm 109:8")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Can only guess you haven't been keeping up on cosmology. The "Big Bang" is rapidly losing credibility. A problem is that the scientific establishment is suppressing contradictory evidence, but there is a lot being written on it.

A Brief History of Intolerance in Modern Cosmology

53 posted on 09/06/2010 9:09:38 PM PDT by LiteKeeper ("Psalm 109:8")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; ROTB; jjotto; papabrody
I am somewhat suprised Hawkings is stating the law of gravity as a means stating there need not be a G-d. According to M theory even constants may be completely different from one Brane to another and the requirements for life in our universe allow virtually no variation in any given constant or the whole thing wont work.

And I am not entirely sold on the concept that our universe was created by two Branes colliding, that seems rather convienient.

54 posted on 09/06/2010 10:25:44 PM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; jjotto; papabrody; blasater1960

>jjotto; papabrody; blasater1960

Greetings!


55 posted on 09/06/2010 10:39:38 PM PDT by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
I would note that Hawking's "free lunch" theory violates the logical law of causality and the concept of "nothing" violates the logical laws of identity and non-contradiction.

Faith is faith and therefore not subject to the human invention of logic. Either you have it or you do not.

Chasing your belief system via science or logic is like a dog chasing a car. Even if you do 'catch' it, what do you do with it and what does it have to do with faith?

Do not rise to the temporal bait.

Be unshakable in your beliefs.

56 posted on 09/07/2010 5:13:27 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jjotto; papabrody; blasater1960; ROTB

ROTB is one of those “bodies without a soul” . . . and a particularly annoying one, at that.


57 posted on 09/07/2010 8:00:50 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Zokhrenu lechayyim Melekh chafetz bachayyim; vekhotvenu beSefer HaChayyim lema`ankha 'Eloqim Chayyim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Thanks for the link.
58 posted on 09/07/2010 8:29:15 AM PDT by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960; wideawake
And I am not entirely sold on the concept that our universe was created by two Branes colliding, that seems rather convienient.

I have no idea what a "Brane" is, but if the universe was created by two of them colliding then there was no creation ex nihilo (beri'ah yesh me'ayin).

The whole point is that atheists are at heart a-nihilists who cannot admit the concept of absolute nothingness prior to the universe's coming-to-be. They always have to have some kind of "raw material" from which the universe was created. This is essentially no different from the concept of the eternity of the universe or of matter or of physicality.

59 posted on 09/07/2010 8:58:37 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Zokhrenu lechayyim Melekh chafetz bachayyim; vekhotvenu beSefer HaChayyim lema`ankha 'Eloqim Chayyim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962
"Faith is faith and therefore not subject to the human invention of logic. Either you have it or you do not."

I disagree. Paul himself says that God reveals himself in his creation. That is by definition temporal proof and would include the laws of logic. Our faith is not "blind faith" or a "leap of faith". God gave us plenty of evidence to support our faith.

60 posted on 09/07/2010 9:13:34 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson