Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why So Few Gospels? Inquiring Muslims Want To Know!
National Catholic Register ^ | 6/12/2010 | Jimmy Akin

Posted on 06/13/2010 6:41:27 PM PDT by markomalley

A correspondent writes:

I’m just in need of a helping hand from you, because I’m in the middle of a debate with a muslim friend.

While we’re in the middle of discussion, he happen to addressed me with a question that blew me away, because I don’t have any idea on how I could tackle his question.

This is what he said, “Could you also tell me that there are hundreds of Gospels, then how come only four made it through the New Testament?”

I know that the “Books or Gospels” contained in the New Testament are all inspired by the Holy Spirit, but I think there are much more broader explanation regarding this matter.

I hope you could give me a helping hand regarding this subject Sir. I would really appreciate it if you could give me at least a brief explanation and answer regarding this.

The correspondent is correct that the canonical gospels are inspired by the Holy Spirit and false gospels aren’t. The question is how the Holy Spirit guided the Church into a recognition of which were inspired and which weren’t.

Here’s how that happened . . .

I don’t know that there are literally hundreds of gospels (that would mean 200 or more), but there are a large number of purported gospels that were written between A.D. 100 and A.D. 400. There may have been hundreds written back then (and people continue to crank out false gospels even today, like the Aquarian Gospel of Levi), but only a few dozen survive from those centuries.

The reason that they are not in the New Testament is that they are all fakes. The Church recognized them as such because (1) they often theologically contradicted the canonical gospels that had been passed down from the apostles and their associates and (2) they showed up out of nowhere, with no history of having been read in the churches down through the years.

The canonical gospels, by contrast, all date from the first century, they were written by the apostles or their associates, they were given to the first churches to read, and the churches read them all the way down through history. Also, the doctrine contained in them agreed with the doctrine passed down by the apostles to the bishops and handed on by them.

The later-written “gospels” thus were spotted as phonies because they had not been passed down like the others and they contained bad doctrine.

Eventually, as a warning to the faithful who might be confused by the new gospels, some of the early Church councils—like Rome in 382, Hippo in 393, and Carthage in 397 (among others)—published official canon lists naming the specific books of Scripture that had been handed down as sacred from the time of the apostles.

Incidentally, the image is Matthew 23:3-15 from an Arabic New Testament. (Note also that it reads from right to left.)

Hope this helps!


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: bloodbath; faithandphilosophy; godsgravesglyphs; lifeofbrian; meaningoflife; sectarianturmoil; sleepingwithenemy; smellsandbells; strawman; thomaslinacre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: ColdSteelTalon
I agree with you Catholic Scholars overwhelmingly agree with the Catholic interpretation of the Bible. “their version” of it that is.

Sorry, but the RSV was an ECUMENICAL text prepared in the 1950s in a joint effort between Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants. Because of its nature as a literal translation from Greek/Hebrew, it is one of the preferred English-language scholarly texts in general.

41 posted on 06/14/2010 2:47:25 AM PDT by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Most conservatives would rebel at the idea that government could determine their religion.

If constantine had been a Gnostic, you would be a Gnostic now.


42 posted on 06/14/2010 5:44:14 AM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

HospiceNurse:

That is the popular “legend” among fundamentalist Protestants. Constantine did not make Christianity the state religion. All the Edict of Milan in 313 AD did was change the Roman Law so that Christianity would be given legal protection under the Law and thus was no longer to be persecuted by the Roman State.

It was the Emperor Theodosius, the last Roman Emperor of the united West and Eastern part of the Roman empire who made orthodox Christianity [Nicene-Constantinopilian Creed] the state religion of the Roman empire. This occurred around 380-385.


43 posted on 06/14/2010 6:37:25 AM PDT by CTrent1564
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
If constantine had been a Gnostic, you would be a Gnostic now.

He was actually sympathetic to the arian cause.

44 posted on 06/14/2010 7:20:26 AM PDT by conservonator (How many times? 7X70!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: conservonator

The Arian Controversy and the Council of Nicea

http://ancienthistory.about.com/cs/godsreligion/p/aa082499.htm


45 posted on 06/14/2010 10:00:39 AM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Have had rather poor luck with the scholarship and accuracy with "about" articles, (some make Wiki stuff look downright fact based!): if you could sum up the thesis of their article I'd appreciate it.

Thanks.

46 posted on 06/14/2010 10:11:45 AM PDT by conservonator (How many times? 7X70!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Because Constantine said so.

Is this parody? It's amazing to me that the Dan Brown contingent on FR continues to raise it's ugly head.
47 posted on 06/14/2010 10:20:29 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bronxville
I’ve been debating Muslims on a forum for years. You’ve given the very same answer that they give. Most of the answers they give are the same as that of Protestants who are against the Catholic Church. Did you learn from Muslims or vice versa?

There are some uncanny similarities between the Muslims and the Catholic-hating Protestants on FR. They are also both iconoclasts, for example.
48 posted on 06/14/2010 10:25:06 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
If constantine had been a Gnostic, you would be a Gnostic now.

Constantine was sympathetic to Arianism. Yet, we're not Arians, are we.
49 posted on 06/14/2010 10:26:23 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
There are some uncanny similarities between the Muslims and the Catholic-hating Protestants on FR. They are also both iconoclasts, for example.

Both absolutely reject Mary's title of "Mother of God" using the juvenile argument that "God is older than Mary."

50 posted on 06/14/2010 10:29:30 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse
Why on earth would anyone use "About.com" (a NY Times subsidiary) for information on the Council of Nicaea.

Go to the original source:



The Proceedings of the First Council of Nicæa (A.D. 325)
51 posted on 06/14/2010 10:31:10 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

Yeah, there is also the theory that there was an “Underground” church that dates back to the time of Christ which is not the Catholic Church. That is what I learned growing up in the Church of Christ. Unfortunately these re-writes of history don’t hold up historically speaking.


52 posted on 06/14/2010 11:54:56 AM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (To those who believe the world was safer with Saddam, get treatment for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

No wonder we disagree. I am a member of the only religion founded by Jesus Christ and thus learned my religion from those in the direct lineage.
But thanks for your interesting, schismatic viewpoint.
I know I sound sarcastic but this really isn’t a forum for dividing Christians and your post is a collection of anti-Catholic positions.
For instance, this line: “The Catholic Church has since the beginning totally misinterpreted that verse,” can only be interpreted as Peter and the Apostles misunderstood Jesus as he spoke directly to them but you, 2000 years later, see things clearly.
No need to respond. Nobody’s mind is going to be changed.


53 posted on 06/14/2010 12:19:38 PM PDT by namvolunteer (I am a Catholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: boycott

When you meet your creator, I don’t believe it’s going to matter which denomination. What matters is if you were a believer.

take a chance, Columbus did....a believer in what, Luther, zwingly, Calvin, Wesley. L.Ron Hubbard, Joseph Smith, Muhammed.....nope, Christ founded ONE true church, find it, follow it, it has the only path to the Lord.


54 posted on 06/14/2010 6:13:04 PM PDT by terycarl (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 240B; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
As one might expect, this has gotten a little ugly. But I don't *have to* come back in here. ;')

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · Mirabilis.ca · LiveScience · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


55 posted on 06/14/2010 6:48:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: namvolunteer
I am a member of the only religion founded by Jesus Christ and thus learned my religion from those in the direct lineage.

Not true. The Catholic Church chased down and murdered its competitors wherever it found them. So if what you say were to be true it would only be because the road through Catholic history is paved in blood. If the Catholic Church says it follows Christ then why did they kill those it disagreed with.

can only be interpreted as Peter and the Apostles misunderstood Jesus as he spoke directly to them but you, 2000 years later, see things clearly.

I have the Bible which is God's word and can read it for myself I don't need a religious organization and a priesthood that has a clear history of putting people to death that differed with it to tell me what the gospel of Christ is. I asked a priest once that If I were to be a good Catholic and observe the sacraments and live to the best of my ability as a Catholic, would I have a sure place in heaven? The priests answer was, "I am not sure"

Tell you what I will trust in what Jesus says...

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

No need to respond. Nobody’s mind is going to be changed.

So says you...

56 posted on 06/14/2010 6:51:21 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GCC Catholic
Sorry, but the RSV was an ECUMENICAL text prepared in the 1950s in a joint effort between Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants. Because of its nature as a literal translation from Greek/Hebrew, it is one of the preferred English-language scholarly texts in general.

All Wescott and Hort men to the bone.

57 posted on 06/14/2010 6:54:37 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Sorry, but that argument is sufficiently weak not to impress me.

If one were to pick out the best thing about the Catholic Church, it would be their unity of purpose.


58 posted on 06/14/2010 7:13:13 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon; NYer; Salvation; Petronski
It was the acknowledgment that Jesus is the messiah by Peter that is the "rock" upon which the Church was and is built. Peter is not the Rock upon which the Church was built. Note in the verse Christ also says that the gates of hell will not prevail against it? Jesus was talking about the fact that "Christ is the messiah being the rock". Peter suffered a martyr's death at the hands of Nero, so the gates of hell did prevail against Peter, but not the Rock i.e. "Jesus is the messiah" that rock upon which the Church is built.

Er, the gates of hell would not prevail against the Church.

Also, if Peter was NOT the Rock upon which Christ founded His Church...then why would he give Peter "the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven"?

59 posted on 06/14/2010 8:29:16 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

I have to wonder whether at some time in the past there were certain ‘teachers’ in Islam - their Imams who didn’t add to what Mohammed had supposedly said over the hundreds of years it was apparently preserved in oral tradition. Plus many radicals put a LOT of stock in teachings that weren’t even from Mohammed.


60 posted on 06/14/2010 8:50:19 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson