Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/07/2009 10:02:28 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Locked



Skip to comments.

Is Mary's Queenship Biblical? [Ecumenical]
CatholicAnswers-The Rock ^ | not given | Edward P. Sri

Posted on 08/22/2009 1:20:36 PM PDT by Salvation

Is Mary's Queenship Biblical?

By Edward P. Sri

Mary’s title as "Queen of Heaven and Earth" is a great scandal to many non-Catholic Christians. After all, the Bible doesn’t mention anything about there being a queen in God’s kingdom. All this royal attention Catholics give to Mary—whether it’s singing "Hail, holy queen enthroned above" or portraying Mary in statues and paintings with a crown on her head—seems to many non-Catholics to detract from the royalty of Christ, who alone is King of Kings. Besides, how could Mary be a queen, since she is not the wife of the Jesus but only his mother?

One biblical theme sheds light on these questions and serves as a key for unlocking the mystery of Mary’s queenship: the Old Testament tradition of the "queen mother" in the Davidic kingdom.

In the monarchy of King David, as well as in other ancient kingdoms of the Near East, the mother of the ruling king held an important office in the royal court and played a key part in the process of dynastic succession. In fact, the king’s mother ruled as queen, not his wife.

The great pre-eminence of the king’s mother may seem odd from our modern Western perspective, in which we think of a queen as being the wife of a king. However, recall that most ancient Near-Eastern kings practiced polygamy. King Solomon had seven hundred wives (1 Kgs. 11:3)—imagine the chaos in the royal court if all seven hundred were awarded the queenship! But since each king had only one mother, one can see the practical wisdom in bestowing the queenship upon her.

A number of Old Testament passages reflect the important role of the queen mother in the Davidic kingdom. For example, almost every time the narrative of 1 and 2 Kings introduces a new monarch in Judah, it mentions the king’s mother as well, showing the mother’s intimate involvement in her royal son’s reign. Similarly, the queen mother is listed among the members of the royal court whom king Jehoiachin surrendered to the king of Babylon in 2 Kings 24:12.

Her royal office is also described by the prophet Jeremiah, who tells how the queen mother possessed a throne and a crown, symbolic of her position of authority in the kingdom: "Say to the king and the queen mother: ‘Take a lowly seat, for your beautiful crown has come down from your head. . . . Lift up your eyes and see those who come from the north. Where is the flock that was given you, your beautiful flock?’" (Jer. 13:18, 20). It is significant that God directed this oracle about the upcoming fall of Judah to both the king and his mother. Addressing both king and queen mother, Jeremiah portrays her as sharing in her son’s rule over the kingdom.

Probably the clearest example of the queen mother’s role is that of Bathsheba, wife of David and mother of Solomon. Scholars have noted the excellence of Bathsheba’s position in the kingdom once she became queen mother during Solomon’s rule. Compare the humble attitude of Bathsheba as spouse of King David (1 Kgs. 1:16–17, 31) with her majestic dignity as mother of the next king, Solomon (1 Kgs. 2:19–20). As spouse of the king, Bathsheba bows with her face to the ground and does obeisance to her husband, David, upon entering his royal chamber. In striking contrast, after her son Solomon assumed the throne and she became queen mother, Bathsheba receives a glorious reception upon meeting with her royal son:

"So Bathsheba went to King Solomon, to speak to him on behalf of Adonijah. And the king rose to meet her, and bowed down to her; then he sat on his throne and had a seat brought for the king’s mother; and she sat on his right. Then she said, ‘I have one small request to make of you; do not refuse me.’ And the king said to her, ‘Make your request, my mother; for I will not refuse you’" (1 Kgs. 2:19–20).

This account reveals the sovereign prerogatives of the queen mother. Note how the king rises and bows as she enters. Bathsheba’s seat at the king’s right hand has the greatest significance. In the Bible, the right hand is the place of ultimate honor. This is seen in particular in the messianic Psalm 110 ("Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool"). In fact, many New Testament passages refer to the right-hand imagery of Psalm 110 to show Christ’s divinity and his reign with the Father over the whole universe (e.g., Hebrews 1:13). Thus, the queen mother sitting at the king’s right hand symbolizes her sharing in the king’s royal authority and illustrates how she holds the most important position in the kingdom, second only to the king.

This passage regarding Bathsheba also shows how the queen mother served as an advocate for the people, carrying petitions to the king. In 1 Kings 2:17, Adonijah asks Bathsheba to take a petition for him to King Solomon. He says to her: "Pray ask King Solomon—he will not refuse you—to give me Abishag the Shunammite as my wife" (1 Kgs. 2:17). It is clear that Adonijah recognizes the queen mother’s position of influence over the king, so he confidently turns to Bathsheba as an intercessor for his request.

A few Old Testament prophecies incorporate the queen mother tradition when telling of the future Messiah. One example is Isaiah 7:14, which originated during a time of dynastic crisis in Judah when Syria and Israel were threatening Jerusalem and plotting to overthrow King Ahaz. God offers Ahaz a sign that the kingdom will continue: "Hear then, O house of David! Is it too little for you to weary men, that you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son and shall call his name Emmanuel" (Isa. 7:13–14).

On one level, this passage points to the next king (Hezekiah) as a pledge that the Davidic dynasty will continue despite the threats of invading armies. At the same time, the royal son who is to be named "Emmanuel" points to the future messianic king (cf., Isa. 9:6–7, 11:1–2). This is why the New Testament says Jesus fulfills this prophecy from Isaiah (Matt. 1:23).

For our purposes we should note how this prophecy links the mother to her royal son. Since the oracle is addressed specifically to the Davidic household and concerns the continuation of the dynasty, the young woman bearing forth the royal son would be understood as a queen mother. This has implications for our understanding of Mary. Since the mother of the king always ruled as queen mother, we should expect to find the mother of the messianic king playing the role of the true queen mother in the everlasting Kingdom of God.

With this Old Testament background, we can now more clearly see how the New Testament portrays Mary in light of the queen mother tradition.

The Gospel of Matthew has often been called the "Gospel of the Kingdom." Matthew emphasizes that Jesus is "the Son of David," who is the true King of the Jews establishing the "Kingdom of Heaven." With all this kingly imagery, it should not be surprising to find queen mother themes as well.

Right away, Matthew shows explicitly how the infant Jesus is the "Emmanuel" child as prophesied in Isaiah 7:14 (Matt. 1:23). As we saw above, this prophecy links the royal messianic child with his queen mother. Further, Matthew singles out the intimate relationship between the mother and her royal son by using the phrase "the child and his mother" five times in the first two chapters, recalling the close association between queen mother and royal son as described in the Books of Kings. Just as the queen mother was constantly mentioned alongside the Judean kings in 1 and 2 Kings, so Mary is frequently mentioned alongside her royal son, Jesus, in Matthew’s infancy narrative (Matt. 1:18; 2:11, 13, 14, 20, 21).

We find Mary portrayed against the background of Davidic kingdom motifs in Luke’s Gospel as well, especially in his accounts of the Annunciation and Visitation. First, the angel Gabriel is said to appear to a virgin betrothed to a man "of the house of David" (1:27). Then the angel tells Mary, "And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great, and will be called Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there will be no end" (Luke 1:31–33).

Hear the strong Davidic overtones describing Mary and her royal son: a woman from the house of David giving birth to a son who will be the new king whose reign will never end. With echoes from the queen mother tradition of the Davidic kingdom and the mother-son prophecy of Isaiah 7:14, we can conclude that Mary is being given the vocation of queen mother.

Mary’s royal office is made even more explicit in Luke’s account of the Visitation. Elizabeth greets Mary with the title "the mother of my Lord" (Luke 1:43). This title is charged with great queenly significance. In the royal court language of the ancient NearEast, the title "Mother of my Lord" was used to address the queen mother of the reigning king (who himself was addressed as "my Lord"; cf., 2 Sam. 24:21). Thus with this title Elizabeth is recognizing the great dignity of Mary’s role as the royal mother of the king, Jesus.

Finally, Mary’s queenship can be seen in the great vision described in Revelation 12: "And a great portent appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; she was with child and she cried out in her pangs of birth, in anguish for delivery" (Rev. 12:1–2). Who is this newborn child? He is described as the messianic king exercising his dominion. In verse 5, the author of Revelation chose the messianic Psalm 2 to describe how this child will "rule all the nations with a rod of iron" (Rev. 12:5, Ps. 2:9). This royal son is taken up to heaven to sit on a throne (Rev. 12:5), and he ushers in the kingdom of God by defeating the devil: "Now the kingdom of our God has come, for the accuser has been throne down" (12:10). Certainly, this newborn child is the royal Messiah, King Jesus.

In this light it is clear who this woman is who gave birth to the messiah: It is Mary. Some people have interpreted this woman in Revelation 12 as merely a symbol either for the Old Testament people of Israel or for the New Testament Church and therefore have concluded that the woman cannot be an individual (i.e., Mary). However, this "either-or" proposition is foreign to the biblical worldview, in which individuals often symbolically represent collective groups. For instance, Adam represented all humanity (Rom. 5:19), and Jacob stood for all of Israel (Ps. 44:4). Given this biblical notion called "corporate personality," the woman in Revelation 12 should be understood as both an individual (Mary) and a symbol for the people of God.

But for our purposes, once we see that this woman is Mary, the mother of Jesus, it is important to note how she is portrayed as queen in this passage. Her royal office is hinted at by the imagery of the sun, moon, and twelve stars, which recalls the Old Testament story of Joseph’s dream in which the sun, moon, and stars bow down before him, symbolizing his future authority (Gen. 37:9–11). Her queenship is made even clearer by the crown of twelve stars on her head. Just like the queen mother in Jeremiah 13:18, here Mary is wearing a crown, symbolizing her royal office in the kingdom of heaven. In sum, Revelation 12 portrays Mary as the new queen mother in the Kingdom of God, sharing in her son’s rule over the universe.

We have seen how the Old Testament queen mother tradition serves as an important background for understanding Mary’s royal office. Indeed, the New Testament portrays Mary as the queen mother par excellence. Thus, prayers, hymns, and art giving honor to Mary’s queenship are most fitting biblical responses for Christians. In honoring her as queen mother we do not take anything away from Christ’s glory, but rather we exalt him even more by recognizing the great work he has done in her and through her.

Understanding Mary as queen mother sheds light on her important intercessory role in the Christian life. Just like the queen mother of the Davidic kingdom, Mary serves as advocate for the people in the Kingdom of God today. Thus, we should approach our queen mother with confidence, knowing that she carries our petitions to her royal son and that he responds to her as Solomon did to Bathsheba: "I will never refuse you."


Edward P. Sri is assistant professor of Religious Studies at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas. He holds a Licentiate in Sacred Theology from the Angelicum in Rome, where he is currently a doctoral candidate.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; holymarymotherofgod; saints
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-213 next last
To: Servant of the Cross

True...but Jesus was no more being literal there than he was in John 4:

“13Jesus said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again, 14but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” 15The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”

John 5:

“35He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. 36But the testimony that I have is greater than that of John.”

John 7:

“38Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” 39Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.”

Jesus didn’t give the woman at the well superwater. John the Baptist wasn’t a flashlight. And Christians aren’t water fountains.

And earlier in chapter 6 we read: “35Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me shall not hunger, and whoever believes in me shall never thirst.”

All of these verses have spiritual meaning. As is, “48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50 This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”


61 posted on 08/22/2009 8:32:45 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
66 and 67 come after 63.

Yes. Read the entire passage of John 6:41-71, and you will see that after Jesus explained the metaphor, and that only God would determine who would come to Jesus (and thus life), many left Him.

Read the entire section, literally. Keep the verses in order, consider the context and the preceding verses. It's pretty clear:

Jesus stated that you had to eat the Bread of Life to live forever. He said He was the Bread. And then He clarified that it is Spirit and NOT flesh that gives Life, and that His words were the Spirit and thus Life.

He stated that only those granted by God would come to Him. Some of His disciples found this troubling, and left. The Twelve stayed with Him, though.

Is that not a fair reading and summation of the passage?

62 posted on 08/22/2009 8:36:32 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
He stated that only those granted by God would come to Him. Some of His disciples found this troubling, and left.

Huh?! Followers that had been with him for a long time, witnessing many miracles, being filled both physically and spiritually, would be troubled by Jesus saying "that only those granted by God would come to Him"?! They would certainly believe that they were within this chosen people and would not have been troubled by this saying at all!

63 posted on 08/22/2009 8:42:40 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jbp1

"Never apologize for the Blessed Virgin Mary!"

~~Mother Angelica~~


64 posted on 08/22/2009 8:48:37 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: T Minus Four

We ask Mary to intercede for us. We don’t ask her to glorify herself. In fact, her last words in the Bible are about her Son: “Do whatever he tells you.”

Can’t fault that at all.


65 posted on 08/22/2009 8:50:56 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Read verses 65 and 66:

65And He was saying, "For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father."

66As a result of this many of His disciples withdrew and were not walking with Him anymore.

Jesus says that only those God has granted will come to Jesus, and that causes many of his disciples to leave.

What part is not clear?

66 posted on 08/22/2009 8:52:34 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire

You evidently do not know of the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception. She had a clean soul in order to house our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ in her womb.

Might be good for you to do some digging and thinking about that.


67 posted on 08/22/2009 8:52:39 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raygunfan; TFMcGuire

Evidently they have not heard of typology. There is much forshadowing of the New Testament to be found in the New Testament.

McGuire, have you ever heard of it before? Check into it.


68 posted on 08/22/2009 8:56:34 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding

**Well, the first Lutheran was adamant that Mary is the Queen of Heaven.**

Right on, FRiend.


69 posted on 08/22/2009 8:57:23 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
I believe that the word "blessed" has meaning far beyond my weak imagination (but certainly to include Queenship and Immaculate Conception).

She is the new "Eve"; Mary's "yes" eclipses Eve's sin (as her Son's "yes" reverses Adam's sin).

Mary is the theotokos, the "bearer of God."

She is the new tabernacle, replacing the former tabernacle carried in Moses' time.

All generations will call me blessed. Future generations would forget an ordinary peasant girl who was merely 'good'. She's remembered and 'blessed' because God willed it.

She was the spouse of the Holy Spirit who overshadowed her.

She carried the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus Christ in her womb for nine months.

70 posted on 08/22/2009 8:57:41 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
"And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of netherworld shall not prevail against it." ... Matthew 16:18

Peter was the first Pope, upon whom Christ built His Church. Every Pope since has been the direct successor of Peter himself. As the Vicar of Christ on earth and the head of the Church He established, the Pope speaks with authority on matters of faith and morals. Such as the Queenship of Mary and Immaculate Conception

"There are also many other things that Jesus did, but if these were to be described individually, I do not think the whole world would contain the books that would be written." … John 21:25

71 posted on 08/22/2009 9:02:56 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

**Literal interpretation is simple**

YOPIIOS
Your
Own
Personal
Interpretation
Of
Scripture.

Sorry, but Catholics don’t put that kind of spin on Scriptrue. (by trying to interpret it for themselves.) I’ve often wondered why Protestant do that. Maybe you have an explanation.


72 posted on 08/22/2009 9:04:19 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
In fact, her last words in the Bible are about her Son: “Do whatever he tells you.”

Jesus tells us that the womb that bore Him is not blessed; in fact, only those who listen and believe His words are blessed.

So if you follow the direction of Mary, you should not bless her because she told us to do as He says, and Jesus says to not bless her.

73 posted on 08/22/2009 9:04:39 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yet where does Mary claim she is blessed? She literally states that people will call her blessed, but she does not state that she IS blessed.


74 posted on 08/22/2009 9:07:00 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Great thread Salvation! If I may be so bold, I think you will love the video linked at post 45.


75 posted on 08/22/2009 9:07:35 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: All
Is Mary's Queenship Biblical? [Ecumenical]
Happy Mothers Day: Queen of the Holy Ordinary
August 22 - Memorial of the Queenship of Mary

HOMILIES PREACHED BY FATHER ALTIER ON THE SOLEMNITY OF THE QUEENSHIP OF MARY
What About Mary as QUEEN OF AMERICA?
Mary Is Queen of Heaven, Not Pope (part 2)
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XII: ON PROCLAIMING THE QUEENSHIP OF MARY [AD CAELI REGINAM]
Some points to consider about the Queenship of Mary

76 posted on 08/22/2009 9:12:55 PM PDT by Salvation (With God all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
Are you suggesting that only her human mind knew that all future generations would call her blessed?!

It was a deep prayer and revelation born of the understanding that the Holy Spirit (who overshadowed her) revealed to her in a deeply spiritual way. The only way that all generations will call her blessed would be if it was the will of God and that He revealed that to Mary through the Holy Spirit.

77 posted on 08/22/2009 9:13:22 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
**Literal interpretation is simple**

For that section of scripture, if you interpret it literally, it is quite easy. Is it not? Whether or not it should be interpreted literally is a different question. But it is quite easy to literally interpret.

Sorry, but Catholics don’t put that kind of spin on Scriptrue

No, Catholics believe that only the Church can interpret Scripture, and anything that the Church does not authorize is heretical.

Of course, the Scripture also states that the Word of God is Jesus, and that Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life and no one comes to the Father but through Him.

Apparently, now, the Catholic Church has assumed the role of the gatekeeper to God, since it is the sole arbiter of what is "proper Scripture" understanding. It has replaced Christ as the Way.

I’ve often wondered why Protestant do that. Maybe you have an explanation.

2 Timothy 3:15-17. Scripture is all that is needed for salvation, teaching, reproof, correction, for every good work. You do not need someone's interpretation of it. Per Scripture itself.

But back to Mary, the reason for this thread. Jesus Himself says that Mary is not to be blessed because of her position as His mother. And in fact, as believers WE are His family, not those who were related to Him by flesh.

78 posted on 08/22/2009 9:15:31 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the Defense of the Indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I don’t think I’m making myself clear...

Mary said - correctly - that all future generations would call her blessed. Yet she never so called herself!

Stating what you believe others will call you does not mean you agree with their beliefs.

Please tell me where Mary calls herself blessed, or where Jesus calls her blessed. We have Mary saying others will consider her blessed, but that’s it.


79 posted on 08/22/2009 9:18:16 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the Defense of the Indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; Mr Rogers; PugetSoundSoldier
You mean, like “whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” 15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”

Joh 6:35 And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

So then it's clear...If you eat Jesus flesh and drink his blood, you will never be hungry or thirsty again...

Trouble is, I haven't seen any Eucharist eaters giving up on food or drink...I haven't given up on food even tho I believe on Jesus Christ...What's up with that???

80 posted on 08/22/2009 9:20:53 PM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson