Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,341 next last
To: MarkBsnr

I don’t know. I went to the temple for the first time in 1997, so....


1,241 posted on 07/17/2007 10:33:26 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1240 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl

Thank you. I wonder if some LDS members with more longevity might care to comment.


1,242 posted on 07/17/2007 10:44:49 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariae. R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
It's a 'problem' for me (and you, too) that I can find NOWHERE in your Scriptures that REQUIRES you to 'do' the things that you 'do' in the temple.

Your inability to find something in the scriptures that is plainly there is not a problem for me, it is required, the requirement came form modern day scripture, God told me the church was true, so the scriptures that it provides are also true, just like the bible is true because Jesus tells us it is. Once you have a testimony of the truthfulness of the church, everything else falls into place. The Bible, the BOM, the D&C the PGP all fit together neatly like the pieces of a puzzle. Are there more pieces? Yes, but we have all that is required to do complete all the ordinances and save ourselves with all our dead as was prophesied in the Bible. MALACHI 4:5-6
5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.
The meaning of this scripture is made clear with modern revelation, we are to do the great geneological work that we are indeed doing. We are commanded to care for our ancestors who had no opportunity to have the saving ordinances done for themselves, we are so commanded and it mattereth not that you do not understand it, for We Mormons, we do. We will keep the commands of the Lord. whether they be found in the Book of Mormon, the Bible or the D&C or the PGP, we, the sheep of the fold know his voice, and we are harkening to it. If ye be goats and harken not, that is not our job, we are commanded to spread the word, so we do, we are commanded to go out into the world as missionaries, so we do. No amount of posting, prevaricating, complaining or dire predicting can stop the work of God which I testify to you this is.
1,243 posted on 07/21/2007 8:03:01 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1213 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Oh??

Like what?


Like the very things you are asking about here.
1,244 posted on 07/21/2007 8:04:09 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I said I thought I had made that clear, perhaps not.

You said: Once again; you failed to answered the question of WHY you do it.

I am NOT asking you to 'reveal' any of your precious secrets; just the justification for keeping them secret.


This is actually very simple, If I come to you in confidence, and say:

"You have to swear to me you not tell any one what I am going to say..." IF you agree, so you can hear what secret I am going to impart, you are bound, or a liar one of the two.

Why would you keep it secret? Because you are honest.

IF what you are being told is supposed to be kept form someone else like a birthday party's time, or keys and tokens needed to return to God, then you keep them sacred, secret if you don't believe the commitment was to God, but you "keep" to your self that which you covenanted to, or you are a liar.

It's that simple.

You Said: Is THAT a big SACRED thing you cannot reveal as well??

Simply put, our justification is that we gave our word.
1,245 posted on 07/21/2007 8:21:39 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1215 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
FIP magic decoder ring PLACEMARK
1,246 posted on 07/21/2007 8:56:59 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (B.Richardson spends taxpayer dollars for his goofy projects, but not ONE cent for a decent toupee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1239 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
The Catholics would have us believe that once Jesus established his church, it would never be taken form the earth. This is in direct crontravention of the Bible even though they tried to eliminate as many of the books of scripture as they could that had such refrences in them, some slipped through.

(See how it can be made to look?)

Sadly with the institution of the Nicene creed (IMHO), the apostasy away from the teachings started by Jesus Christ was complete.

Are you disputing Greek philospohical influence on early christianity?

Arius had it right, in spite of your attempts to display him in as bad of a light as you can, so did Hippolytus who was the voice of the church in his day. Hippolytus fought against the greek influence that started to change the definition of God, from being one of Corporeal, sperate entities to one of a Greek influenced shapless formless immaterial being, from one of our father, who looks like us to one of a Being who has no appearance and who's realtionship with us is of a more tenuous nature.

If you honestly study this searching for the truth, you will find truth, if you look only at attack models, you will find only what you seek, not what is true.
1,247 posted on 07/21/2007 9:12:52 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1224 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
All Catholic rites are not only open to the public, but published to the world for all to see.

So, when is the last time you participated in slectign a new pope (just an example)

Interesting: I started to search the web for references to LDS rites. I came across several that compared them to Masonic rites

They are similar for the mnasons claim to have gotten their cerimonies from watching the priests while working on the temple in jerusalem, Jospeh smith Got his from God. The discrepancies would be where the masons either heard wrong, or where they lost somehting over the ages, but they would bear at least a superficial resemblance.

There is a little matter of the authority to administer the rites...
1,248 posted on 07/21/2007 9:17:53 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1225 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
If this is turning into a Bill Clinton deposition, it is because you are trying to redefine the word ‘at.’

The word at means what it means, and it is fine, you are trying to redefine at to mean in it does not.

Words mean things.

That is what I said. Smith made a simple mistake.

No, in this case, he did not, he was and is correct.

Why doesn’t your church just fix it like the thousands of other little mistakes that have been fixed in the BOM?

If adding punctuation invalidates the BOM then the Bible was invalid long before the BOM was translated. As for why doesn't the church just fix it...

Let's see, in an alternate reality, the church decides to take revelation from you on this, would that end the controversy? (ROTFLOL) yeah, I thought so, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. He said at, he meant at, at is the correct way to describe it, get over it.

You claim your Prophet was not perfect. Yet you will deny a clear imperfection!

I said I did not claim he was perfect, I did not claim he was imperfect, sheesh!

If this is an example of the accuracy of your reading skills I see why we are having a problem with a written record. I am not denying a "clear imperfection" I am telling you I don't think it's an imperfection, I think It was supposed to be that way (IMHO).
1,249 posted on 07/21/2007 9:37:03 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1227 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
This is actually very simple, If I come to you in confidence, and say:

"You have to swear to me you not tell any one what I am going to say..." IF you agree, so you can hear what secret I am going to impart, you are bound, or a liar one of the two.

So; once again, for the umpteenth time, "Who asked you?" and WHY did they ask you?

1,250 posted on 07/21/2007 11:48:16 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; MarkBsnr
Sadly with the institution of the Nicene creed (IMHO), the apostasy away from the teachings started by Jesus Christ was complete.

So THERE!!

Quit picking on US and DEFEND yerself!!

--MormonDude

1,251 posted on 07/21/2007 11:49:58 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
So; once again, for the umpteenth time, "Who asked you?" and WHY did they ask you?

Lets try answering this three separate ways (to add to the many I have already answered.

1.
God, through his officiator (the guy leading the ceremony, if you want the guy's name, get use to disappointment) Asks you. And they ask you because it is a sacred thing and it's part of the ceremony that only those agreeing to keep it sacred can continue with the ceremony.

2.
a) God asks you. b) The ceremony is sacred and those who don't commit to hold it sacred are not allowed to continue, because that is how God wants it.
3.
If I, or God or your sister won't tell you something, and you agree not to tell you are now bound by your word, or you are untrust worthy, period.

If I ask why I or God, or your sister, want some thing kept secret or sacred you have to ask them, I cannot ask you for you have agreed to keep it secret, capisce?
You will now undoubtably say this is not good enough, but really, it is.

God speaks. I for one Obey his word. End of story.
1,252 posted on 07/21/2007 3:10:39 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1250 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; MarkBsnr
You quote me: Sadly with the institution of the Nicene creed (IMHO), the apostasy away from the teachings started by Jesus Christ was complete.

You add: So THERE!!

You editorialize me: Quit picking on US and DEFEND yerself!!

I stated my opinion, if me having an opinion feels like an attack, then you must feel attacked a lot (I am very opinonated). MarkBsnr stated soem things and quoted some things that I believe to be in error, I illustrated that, then I stated my opinion, hten concluded with some philosophy.

You spell your name wrong: --MormonDude

(that was humor, JFTR)
1,253 posted on 07/21/2007 3:19:24 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
1. God, through his officiator (the guy leading the ceremony, if you want the guy's name, get use to disappointment) Asks youAnd they ask you because it is a sacred thing and it's part of the ceremony that only those agreeing to keep it sacred can continue with the ceremony.

2. a) God asks you. b) The ceremony is sacred and those who don't commit to hold it sacred are not allowed to continue, because that is how God wants it.
 
 
Once again, you've AVOIDED answering the WHY you get asked these questions.
 
If GOD really wants you to do this, it should be in your Scriptures.
 
Only ONE question this time:
 
 
 
Why don't you point them out?
 
 

1,254 posted on 07/21/2007 7:45:13 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
I stated my opinion, if me having an opinion feels like an attack, then you must feel attacked a lot (I am very opinonated).

I've been hangin' out with you guys so long, that...

1,255 posted on 07/21/2007 7:46:21 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1253 | View Replies]

To: All

Not a highjack, but just a question.

Tomorrow, we are winding up a weeks worth of VBS; Vacation Bible School.

The wife (and now me, too) was wondering whether Catholics have anything like that.

And I'm wondering if the LDS do as well.

1,256 posted on 07/21/2007 7:49:18 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1255 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
The land was know as the land of Judea, not the land of Jeruselem.

To those familliar with it sure, but what about those who came from there and knew nothing of it except that Jerusalem was their former home? We're talkign 500 years after the fact, living in the New World. BTW, there are many many names for that area by the local of the time, not just the land of Judea. Here are a few: Canaan, Divided Kingdom, Eretz Israel, Israel, Judea, Palestine, Pelesheth, Philistia, Samaria, United Kingdom....

1,257 posted on 07/21/2007 9:23:33 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1226 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
Mark, besides the references that have been posted, here are a few more that I have found most helpful, and might be somewhat different than the others already posted.

http://www.signaturebookslibrary.org/skeptic/chapter8.htm#Masonic
http://www.xmission.com/%7ecountry/reason/widowson.htm
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/2671/ECLDSEn.html

1,258 posted on 07/21/2007 9:59:49 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1234 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr
I think that you will find seer stones or sacred stones or avenues for God do deal with man throughout the bible, both in scripture and in lore.

The LDS firmly believe in “opposition of all things” which basically means there is a good and evil version of practically everything.

Thus crystal balls (evil) vs. urim and thummum (good)

This is a very good read on sacred stones throughout history.

http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=jbms&id=148

1,259 posted on 07/21/2007 10:04:58 PM PDT by sevenbak (After the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers... Acts 24:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1236 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Once again, you've AVOIDED answering the WHY you get asked these questions.

I have given you logical, reasonable answers I am to the point that I am going to ask you, since my answers are wrong, what answer were you looking for?

If GOD really wants you to do this, it should be in your Scriptures.

The text of the ceremony is not supposed to be in the scriptures we have now. 2/3 of the Plates delivered by Moron to Joseph smith were sealed because we were not ready for the truth they contain. Why do you think God would print what he has commanded people to keep sacred in scriptures given to everyone?

Only ONE question this time:
Why don't you point them out?


What? The scriptures containing the covenants? Nope, not going there for they are not in the scriptures that would make the command to keep them acred pretty moot don't you think?

Scriptures telling us to go to the temple? I pointed out some from the D&C, you said they did not count.

I have no intention of Showing you a scripture that says we need to covenant with God before going through the temple, for this looks to me like the "God can't make a stone so big he can't move it" argument against God being all powerful.

I have answered your questions as many ways as I can and be truthful, so again, what (in your mind) was the right answer?
1,260 posted on 07/21/2007 11:38:33 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1254 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson