Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Mormon Brothers?
Reformed Evangelist ^ | May 14th, 2007 | Jeff Fuller

Posted on 07/05/2007 3:00:33 AM PDT by Gamecock

Mormon Evangelists

The following draws from the book Is the Mormon My Brother by apologist James White. Earlier this year, Paul Kaiser reprinted a Worldview article titled 10 Mormonism Facts which generated a myriad of responses from visitors who stated that Mormons were being misrepresented and are simply our brothers & sisters in the Body of Christ. Let’s look at what Dr. White presents using LDS resources:

The First Vision

Without question the key revelation in Mormon Scripture regarding the nature of God is to be found in what is known as the First Vision of Joseph Smith. The vision itself is fundamental to all of LDS theology. Mormon Apostle Bruce R. McConkie described the vision:

That glorious theophany which took place in the spring of 1820 and which marked the opening of the dispensation of the fullness of times is called the First Vision. It is rated as first both from the standpoint of time and of pre-eminent importance. In it Joseph Smith saw and conversed with the Father and the Son, both of which exalted personages were personally present before him as he lay enwrapped in the Spirit and overshadowed by the Holy Ghost.

This transcendent vision was the beginning of latter day revelation; it marked the opening of the heavens after the long night of apostate darkness; with it was ushered in the great era of restoration, the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. (Acts 3:21.) Through it the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens, and because of it the truth about those Beings whom it is life eternal to know began again to be taught among men. (John 17:3.) With this vision came the call of that Prophet who, save Jesus only, was destined to do more for the salvation of men in this world, than any other man that ever lived in it. (D. & C. 135:3.) This vision was the most important event that had taken place in all world history from the day of Christ’s ministry to the glorious hour when it occurred.(1)

And Mormon Prophet Ezra Taft Benson said,

Joseph Smith, a prophet of God, restored the knowledge of God. Joseph’s first vision clearly revealed that the Father and Son are separate personages, having bodies as tangible as mans. Later it was also revealed that the Holy Ghost is a personage of Spirit, separate and distinct from the personalities of the Father and the Son. (See D&C 130:22.) This all-important truth shocked the world even though sustained by the Bible. (2)

How is it that the creeds of Christendom were shattered to smithereens and the knowledge of God was restored by this one vision? While the story is as familiar to Mormons as John 3:16 is to Christians, we present Joseph Smith’s own recounting of the story in full, taken from the LDS Scriptures (and hence carrying canonical authority). However, we note that the account that appears in the LDS Scriptures was written in 1838, eighteen years after the events described:

14 So, in accordance with this, my determination to ask of God, I retired to the woods to make the attempt. It was on the morning of a beautiful, clear day, early in the spring of eighteen hundred and twenty. It was the first time in my life that I had made such an attempt, for amidst all my anxieties I had never as yet made the attempt to pray vocally.

15 After I had retired to the place where I had previously designed to go, having looked around me, and finding myself alone, I kneeled down and began to offer up the desires of my heart to God. I had scarcely done so, when immediately I was seized upon bysome power which entirely overcame me, and had such an astonishing influence over me as to bind my tongue so that I could not speak. Thick darkness gathered around me, and it seemed to me for a time as if I were doomed to sudden destruction.

16 But, exerting all my powers to call upon God to deliver me out of the power of this enemy which had seized upon me, and at the very moment when I was ready to sink into despair and abandon myself to destruction—not to an imaginary ruin, but to the power of some actual being from the unseen world, who had such marvelous power as I had never before felt in any being just at this moment of great alarm, I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me.

17 It no sooner appeared than I found myself delivered from the enemy which held me bound. When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!

18 My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)–and which I should join.

19 I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong;(3) and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.

20 He again forbade me to join with any of them; and many other things did he say unto me, which I cannot write at this time. When I came to myself again, I found myself lying on my back, looking up into heaven. When the light had departed, I had no strength; but soon recovering in some degree, I went home. And as I leaned up to the fireplace, mother inquired what the matter was. I replied, Never mind, all is well I am well enough off. I then said to my mother, I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true. It seems as though the adversary was aware, at a very early period of my life, that I was destined to prove a disturber and an annoyer of his kingdom; else why should the powers of darkness combine against me? Why the opposition and persecution that arose against me, almost in my infancy? (Joseph Smith History 1:14-20).

What does this vision, recorded in LDS Scripture, teach concerning God? First and foremost, it presents to us the concept of a plurality of gods. This arises from the fact that God the Father is a separate and distinct physical entity from Jesus Christ, His Son. God the Father is possessed of a physical body, as is the Son. This is why McConkie can claim the creeds of Christendom were smashed to smithereens, for the vision has always been interpreted by the LDS leadership to teach that God the Father is a separate and distinct person and being from the Son. The unity of Being that is central to Christian theology is completely denied by Joseph Smith in the First Vision. Hence, you have one God, the Father, directing Smith to another God, the Son.

While it is not our intention to critique these teachings at this point, it should be noted that there are a number of problems with the First Vision, and with the entire development of the LDS concept of God as well. As we noted, this version of the First Vision was not written until 1838. Previous versions, however, differed in substantial details from this final and official account. Most significantly, the presence of both the Father and the Son as separate and distinct gods is not a part of the earlier accounts.(4)

————————————————-

(1) Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine,2nd ed., rev. (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), pp. 284-285, LDSCL.

(2) Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1988), p. 4, LDSCL. On page 101 of the same book, we read this strong statement:

The first vision of the Prophet Joseph Smith is bedrock theology to the Church. The adversary knows this and has attacked Joseph Smith’s credibility from the day he announced the visitation of the Father and the Son. You should always bear testimony to thetruth of the First Vision. Joseph Smith did see the Father and the Son. They conversed with him as he said they did. Any leader who, without reservation, cannot declare his testimony that God and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith can never be a true leader, a true shepherd. If we do not accept this truth if we have not received a witness about this great revelationwe cannot inspire faith in those whom we lead.

(3) One of Mormonism’s leading scholars, James Talmage (and a General Authority), said the following in the General Conference of April, 1920:

This Church, therefore, from its beginning, has been unique, for the organization of the Church was forecasted in this declaration that at the time of Joseph Smiths first vision there was no Church of Jesus Christ upon the earth; and I do not see why people should take issue with us for making that statement (CR1920Apr:103).

(4) I noted a number of the historical problems with Mormonism in Letters to a Mormon Elder, pp. 88-106. For a fuller treatment of this issue, see H. Michael Marquardt and Wesley P. Walters, Inventing Mormonism (Salt Lake: Smith Research Associates, 1994), pp.1-41, and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Mormonism: Shadow or Reality? (Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1982), pp. 143-162.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: apologetics; boggsforgovernor; brothers; christianity; lds; mormon; mormonism; orthodoxy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,341 next last
To: DelphiUser
The whole of Moromn cannon, and most of the works ....

And NONE of the Temple rites!

1,101 posted on 07/13/2007 1:04:35 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Do you have a cite for the artificial insemination of Mary?

KJV Luke 1:34-35
34. Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
35. And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

1,102 posted on 07/13/2007 1:09:58 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
There are various theories floating around out there ...

So it's not exactly written in stone just WHAT it means.

1,103 posted on 07/13/2007 1:11:38 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

All Quiet on the Western Front

Click - click

1,104 posted on 07/13/2007 1:14:08 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1090 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote; colorcountry; restornu
[stranger to you....Yes you are now a stranger when you leave the flock!

When members of a cult turn their backs on former members and treat them like strangers it is called shunning and is a recognized tactic of cults.]

That is probably the most clear description I seen of what goes on that many here will not acknowledge - the “shunning” of former members.

Bears repeating I haven't called mormonism a cult, but this behavior is a fact of life if you leave it, I know!

1,105 posted on 07/13/2007 1:18:59 PM PDT by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
It was a supernatural action. Mormon’s have it wrong.

Thank you for your opinion, I will give it all due consideration.
1,106 posted on 07/13/2007 1:24:47 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1099 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
No, we are not going to post our Sacred ceremonies on the web, sorry.
1,107 posted on 07/13/2007 1:26:23 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Break!

BBL
1,108 posted on 07/13/2007 1:27:36 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Thank you for your opinion, I will give it all due consideration.
____________________________________________________

There is always hope in Christ.


1,109 posted on 07/13/2007 1:29:39 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

KJV Luke 1:34-35
34. Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
35. And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
___________________________________________________________

Thank you. Just seeing the word of God made me happy.


1,110 posted on 07/13/2007 1:33:50 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I just want them to realize that none of the individual faiths make them the chosen people..... that’s only for Jews and Jehovah Witness.... don’t get me started on Mennonites!!!
1,111 posted on 07/13/2007 1:36:49 PM PDT by Porterville (I'm an American. If you hate Americans, I hope our enemies destroy you. I will pray for my soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Are they COMMANDED to do so??

In the Church folks who have free will majoirty would not want to offend the Lord council, and some have the attitude they are putting one over on the Church not realizing it really is the Lord they are dismissing.

The leaders of the Church can advise and council and even tell us about out right commandments/covenants, but some where in the minds of some the focus get redirected towards the Church which only is the Lord's messengers.

My relationship is with the Godhead and striving to always Have the spirit of the Lord in my life.

1,112 posted on 07/13/2007 1:39:14 PM PDT by restornu (Romney keeps his eyes on the mission, and not on those who attacks his campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1097 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Bears repeating I haven't called mormonism a cult, but this behavior is a fact of life if you leave it, I know!

It is not the leaving I would shun some one it is the ugliness one produces when they know in their hearts some of the things they are saying they are distorting to make their point.

I know folks who left the Chruch but they don't become backbitters they move on with their life and I can remain friends with them because I respect their choice.

But if they started a champaign against the church sure I would shun them and find them a stranger which it came to Church things!

When Lucifer left the fold to do his own thing is he not an out cast to the Heavenly Father an enemy?

1,113 posted on 07/13/2007 1:49:18 PM PDT by restornu (Romney keeps his eyes on the mission, and not on those who attacks his campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; DelphiUser

I don’t what that photo is suppose to be but they are not LDS missionaries!


1,114 posted on 07/13/2007 1:50:55 PM PDT by restornu (Romney keeps his eyes on the mission, and not on those who attacks his campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1104 | View Replies]

To: restornu

The thing that I’ve found disturbing isn’t “shunning,” but from the testimony of former Mormons, that the church encourages divorce when one of the spouses leaves the Mormon church. This is contrary to the Bible which says that you should not leave an unbelieving spouse. It is also cult-like in it’s attempted control of members by force and fear.


1,115 posted on 07/13/2007 1:54:27 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

The stone is mostly local depicting a Kiva. The red cedar (Mountain Juniper) around the front door is local.

Cedar siding is out of the Northwest. all the pillars are local spruce and fir. We have a water turn on the old Mormon irrigation ditch. We’re trying to build a reservoir this year to capture some of it. It’s a very dry year this year so the lawns are tough to keep wet.


1,116 posted on 07/13/2007 2:24:03 PM PDT by Utah Binger (Sanctimony: Feigned piety or righteousness; hypocritical devoutness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; Enosh; greyfoxx39; colorcountry; Alamo-Girl; aMorePerfectUnion; Revelation 911; Greg F
King James Version
Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Rev 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

Please note the stark differentiation between by what and whom is justified prior to the Great White Throne of Judgment (the Bride and wedding guests are justified by faith not of their works) and then when the Great Throne occurs (those Judged at the Great Throne will be Judged according to their works). Also, note that scrolls/books are mentioned. When you were saved by confessing with your mouth your trust in Christ, your name was written in the Lamb’s Book of Life and you became a member at the wedding party, as Bride or guest. You will not be standing for Judgment at the Great White Throne of Judgment; the Bride of Christ is not Judged at the Great White Throne of Judgment because those of the Bride are justified by their faith in Him not by their works and He will not be being Judged in Whom your faith is secure.

What is spoken of occurring at the Great White Throne of Judgment is books being opened and judgment according to men’s works.

Young's Literal Translation
Rev 20:12 and I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and scrolls were opened, and another scroll was opened, which is that of the life, and the dead were judged out of the things written in the scrolls -- according to their works;
20:13 and the sea did give up those dead in it, and the death and the hades did give up the dead in them, and they were judged, each one according to their works;
20:14 and the death and the hades were cast to the lake of the fire -- this is the second death;

1,117 posted on 07/13/2007 2:28:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1115 | View Replies]

Alamo_Girl just happened to have posted the following two verses on another thread which make the point of whom you are in Christ thus why you will not stand before the Great White Throne of Judgment:

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. – Gal 2:20

For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God. – Col 3:3

1,118 posted on 07/13/2007 2:35:05 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: Greg F; Grig; sevenbak
The thing that I’ve found disturbing isn’t “shunning,” but from the testimony of former Mormons, that the church encourages divorce when one of the spouses leaves the Mormon church.

This is contrary to the Bible which says that you should not leave an unbelieving spouse.

It is also cult-like in it’s attempted control of members by force and fear.

Where do you get this stuff their are people in the Church who are members but their spouse is not.

1,119 posted on 07/13/2007 2:59:09 PM PDT by restornu (Romney keeps his eyes on the mission, and not on those who attacks his campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1115 | View Replies]

To: restornu

From websites of ex-mormons, movie made by ex-mormons. They say that divorce is encouraged.


1,120 posted on 07/13/2007 3:07:28 PM PDT by Greg F (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson