Posted on 05/18/2006 6:15:53 AM PDT by truthfinder9
CANNES, France (Reuters) - Most critics panned "The Da Vinci Code" on Wednesday ahead of the world premiere of the year's most eagerly awaited movie.
Kicking off the annual Cannes film festival, Ron Howard's adaptation of the Dan Brown bestseller was described variously as "grim," "unwieldy" and "plodding," though one reviewer bucked the trend and said "You'll Louvre It!"
The cool reception was temporarily forgotten at a glitzy opening ceremony, where screen legend Sidney Poitier and Bollywood star Aishwarya Rai joined Da Vinci Code star Tom Hanks and the normally publicity-shy Brown on the red carpet.
Even before its general release on May 18 and 19, The Da Vinci Code generated controversy as Christians around the world called for it to be banned.
The novel has enraged religious groups because one of its characters argues that Jesus Christ married Mary Magdalene and had a child by her, and that elements within the Catholic Church resorted to murder to hide the truth.
In Thailand on Wednesday, a police-run censorship board overturned an earlier decision to cut the last 10 minutes of the film, but insisted the distributor add disclaimers stating it was fiction.
In Ireland, volunteers plan to distribute free copies of a special edition of The Irish Catholic newspaper outside cinemas showing The Da Vinci Code over the weekend.
A Vatican cardinal has called for a boycott of the picture, and the Indian government said it would show the movie to Christian groups before clearing its release. In the mainly Catholic Philippines censors gave it an "adult only" rating.
Howard and Hanks defended the film at a news conference, saying it was a piece of fiction. British actor Alfred Molina, who plays a Machiavellian bishop in the movie, blamed the media for creating controversy where there was little or none.
LAUGHTER, THEN SILENCE
At a screening late on Tuesday in Cannes, members of the audience laughed at the thriller's pivotal moment, and the end of the $125 million picture was greeted with stony silence.
Trade publication Variety had barely a nice word to say.
"A pulpy page-turner in its original incarnation as a huge international bestseller has become a stodgy, grim thing in the exceedingly literal-minded film version of The Da Vinci Code," wrote Todd McCarthy.
Lee Marshall of Screen International agreed.
"I haven't read the book, but I just thought there was a ridiculous amount of exposition," he said. "I thought it was plodding and there was a complete lack of chemistry between Audrey Tautou and Tom Hanks."
Lou Lumenick of the New York Post was far more upbeat:
"Ron Howard's splendid The Da Vinci Code is the Holy Grail of summer blockbusters: a crackling, fast-moving thriller that's every bit as brainy and irresistible as Dan Brown's controversial bestseller."
Critics say the controversy surrounding the film, and the fact more than 40 million people have bought the book, will ensure a strong box office performance, but they believe word-of-mouth is likely to hit sales later on.
The movie industry will be watching The Da Vinci Code particularly closely after the first two summer blockbusters -- "Mission: Impossible III" and "Poseidon" -- stumbled.
Howard had some advice for those who objected to the story.
"There's no question that the film is likely to be upsetting to some people. My advice is ... to not go and see the movie if you think you're going to be upset."
Ian McKellen, an openly gay actor who plays Leigh Teabing in The Da Vinci Code, tried to make light of the controversy.
"I'm very happy to believe that Jesus was married," he said. "I know the Catholic Church has problems with gay people and I thought this would be absolute proof that Jesus was not gay."
The opening ceremony and Da Vinci Code premiere kick off 12 hectic days of screenings, interviews, photocalls and partying in Cannes, the world's biggest film festival.
In reality, that guy does not care about Jesus Christ. This is about trashing Christianity. that is the truth.
disgusting.
"In reality, that guy does not care about Jesus Christ. This is about trashing Christianity. that is the truth. "
Yes..Ian has had a bit of fun these past few days.
I notice he doesn't poke fun at Islam in a similar fashion. The muslims are harder on homosexuality than christians are.
I wonder why he isn't making snide remarks about Islam? Hmmm.....I wonder.
I have 2 guesses
1. He is afraid he would get blown up.
2. Satan is more intrested in attacking Christianity. The Devil is a big fan of Islam.
I'm trying to read the book- currently about 70% finished - and the book has a ridiculous amount of exposition as well. Pages of plodding dialogue discussing the Holy Grail, Mary Magdalene etc. All very tedious. Normally I wouldn't read such a dull book but I thought I should know what everyone was talking about. Turns out not much.
"1. He is afraid he would get blown up. "
hee hee! yes - exactly.
So while these "brave" actors feel so self important in exercising their free speech to bash christianity -they seem strangely cowardly when it comes to Islam don't they?
They know Christians will not drive a UHaul truck full of bombs into the Popcorn stand.
If it's anything like the book it will be upsetting to those people who enjoy a good story, with interesting characters, speaking believable dialogue and involved in suspenseful situations. It's a thriller without thrills.
I wonder how long I'll have to wait for Opie to make a film about the beautiful love story between Muhammed and his 9 yr. old wife?
not even over your corpse. LOL
Yeah, I dunno. I didn't like him so "sloppy" for want of a better word. Hair in his face, dirty, ragged. There was something too human about him...Gandalf being very otherwordly to my reading. But that's just IMHO. :)
It should do well enough at the opening weekend. It really doesn't have much competition in the new releases. MI III will still be selling some tickets.
Memorial Day is a couple of weeks away. If it really is as clunky as some critics are saying there should be a sharp drop off after the opening weekend.
The Fox reviewer loved it.
Was this FOX reviewer Roger Friedman?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,195755,00.html
Yes. One of my colleagues at work emailed it to me, I had to look. What a sycophant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.