Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dealing with The DaVinci Code - A Strategy to Minimize Its Impact
E-mail ^ | April 2006 | Anonymous

Posted on 04/11/2006 3:41:19 PM PDT by Rockitz

WHAT ARE YOU DOING MAY 19TH?

May 19th is the date the Da Vinci Code movie opens. A movie based on a book that wears its heresy and blasphemy as a badge of honor.

What can we as Christians do in response to the release of this movie? I'm going to offer you the usual choices -- and a new one.

Here are the usual suspects:

A) We can ignore the movie. ........

The problem with this option: The box office is a ballot box. The only people whose votes are counted are those who buy tickets. And the ballot box closes on the Sunday of opening weekend. If you stay home, you have lost your chance to make your vote heard. You have thrown your vote away, and from Hollywood's point of view, you don't count. By staying home, you do nothing to shape the decision-making process regarding what movies will make it to the big screen.

B) We can protest. ........

The problem with this option: It doesn't work. Any publicity is good publicity. Protests not only fuel the box office, they make all Christians look like idiots. And again, protests and boycotts do nothing to help shape the decisions being made right now about what movies Hollywood will make in the next few years. (Or they convince Hollywood to make *more* movies that will provoke Christians to protest, which will drive the box office up.)

C) We can discuss the movie. We can be rational and be ready with study guides and workshops and point-by-point refutations of the lies promulgated by the movie. ........

The problem with this option: No one's listening. They think they know what we're going to say already. We'll lose most of these discussions anyway, no matter how prepared we are, because the power of story always trumps the power of facts (why do you think Jesus taught in parables?!). And once again: rational discussion of history does nothing to affect Hollywood's choices regarding what movies to make.

But there's a fourth choice.

D) On May 19th, you should go to the movies.

Just go to another movie.

Save the date now. May 19th, or May 20th. No later than Sunday, May 21st -- that's the day the ballot box closes. You'll get a vote, the only vote Hollywood recognizes: The power of cold hard cash laid down on a box office window on opening weekend.

Use your vote. Don't throw it away. Vote for a movie other than The DaVinci Code. If enough people do it, the powers that be will notice. They won't have a choice.

The major studio movie scheduled for release against DVC is the DreamWorks animated feature Over the Hedge. The trailers look fun, and you can take your kids. And your friends. And their friends. In fact, let's all go see it.

Let's rock the box office in a way no one expects -- without protests, without boycotts, without arguments, without rancor. Let's show up at the box office ballot box and cast our votes. And buy some popcorn, too.

May 19th. Mark your calendars now: Over the Hedge's opening weekend. Buy a ticket.

And spread the word. Forward this e-mail to all the Christians in your address book. Post it on your blogs. Talk about it to your churches. And let's all go to the movies.


TOPICS: Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: christiankooks; christians; davincicode; hollywood; hollywoodagenda; moronicidea; movies; whackjobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last
To: Choose Ye This Day

Is that book worth reading, I'll take your word for it if it is.


41 posted on 04/11/2006 4:14:42 PM PDT by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
I haven't read it and know nothing about it. What is anti-Christian about the Da Vinci Code?
42 posted on 04/11/2006 4:15:07 PM PDT by Connie Cardullo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

"question the Christian faith because of what this book says."
Then they're stupid! You did say it. Just not in so many words!


43 posted on 04/11/2006 4:15:43 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Radix
The movie will do well, and I'll never understand exactly why.

I read the book. I found it mildly entertaining, and a fair work of fiction, but I cannot see how the format of the story line would translate very well into a motion picture. Seems to me it would look something like "National Treasure", which was also B.S. and IMO a lousy movie.

If it does well at the box office, and I suspect it will, it will be because of the controversy around it. Nobody read Satanic Verses, until the Iranians put out a contract on the author, then it becomes a best seller.

44 posted on 04/11/2006 4:16:54 PM PDT by AnnoyedOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2nsdammit
Yeah, because if people "stray from the church", that makes them apostates, right? They shouldn't be able to do that! Off with their heads!

Z-Man is that you? Look out, our boys are hot on yer trail.

45 posted on 04/11/2006 4:18:40 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Blue Scourge
There are plenty of people looking for an excuse not to believe (many on this forum, in fact). The possibility that this might be true will satisfy their skepticism for a while longer. If you are kingdom-minded you will realize that this movie will probably tip more fence sitters over to the other side. Granted they probably would have been weak believers also, but in an eternal sense it's better for them to be in than out if you know what I mean.
46 posted on 04/11/2006 4:18:58 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369

I highly recommend all of Daniel Silva's books. To be accurate, the main character is actually a former Mossad agent who becomes an art restorer.

He never seems to be able to stay retired, however, and is always having to put down his paintbrushes and take care of some terrorist.


47 posted on 04/11/2006 4:19:28 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (If low-skill workers were key to economic growth, Mexico would be an economic powerhouse.-Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

You read too much into my post.


48 posted on 04/11/2006 4:19:43 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: persephone35

I've read the book, and I'm not Christian (I'm Jewish). It's entertaining, but factually incorrect. It accepts a hoax as historical truth, presents conjecture as fact, and paints the Catholic Church, and Christianity in general, in a very unfairly negative light.

I would not recommend reading the book, unless you're looking for a cheap thrill. It certainly delivers that, though. Good airport reading, but I wouldn't take it any more seriously (in fact I'd take it less seriously) than a Frederick Forsyth or Tom Clancy book.


49 posted on 04/11/2006 4:20:42 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LifeOrGoods?

The fact is, the way it is protrayed, most people do not realize it's pure fiction. Most people tell me, though it is a novel, it was well-researched and fatcual, and that it talks about a truth that's been hidden.


50 posted on 04/11/2006 4:20:48 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Years later I am still astonished at it's popularity.

IMHO, it feeds the skeptic's desire not to believe, which is not a good thing from a kingdom perspective.

51 posted on 04/11/2006 4:22:46 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

I've read the book. It did not turn me into an anti-catholic. So I doubt the movie will. Of course it is fiction. At no time during it's readin did I feel like "religion" in general was being bashed.

If it weren't for for constant howling from the church, the book would not have been so long on the best seller list.

On the other hand, the fact that Cardinal Mahony is encouraging Catholic Americans to break the law and harbor illegal aliens, is not fiction.

Why not speak out and protest that?

Flame away!


52 posted on 04/11/2006 4:25:30 PM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Connie Cardullo
I haven't read it and know nothing about it. What is anti-Christian about the Da Vinci Code?

It is based upon a theory about Mary Magdalene being the bride of Christ, and that she bore offspring.. blood descendants of Christ who are alive today. It purports that the Roman Catholic Church maligned Mary because they viewed living descendants of Christ to be a threat to their authority, that she was not a harlot as they implied, but was a noblewoman of the House of Benjamin. It professes that the Templars were guardians of the secret of the San Griel (Holy Grail). It professes that San Griel was a catch phrase whose real meaning was Sang Riel or "Blood Royale", or Royal Blood... the living vessel containing the blood of the Savior.

The RCC considers such things to be heresy. I can see why, but am unsure why those who are not catholic would be so offended by the theory. I do not buy his story about how things went down.. but he DOES touch on some interesting history.

53 posted on 04/11/2006 4:26:04 PM PDT by AnnoyedOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Either way, I do not think it helps the situation when Christian groups are out there saying we should burn the books. That tends not to sit well with the public at large. Burning books brings back bad memories, justified or not. Best advice I have is just remind people it's fiction, if they refuse to believe than that is sad. Remember God said some people's hearts would only be hardened.


54 posted on 04/11/2006 4:29:09 PM PDT by Blue Scourge (C-17, anywhere, anything, anytime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
On the other hand, the fact that Cardinal Mahony is encouraging Catholic Americans to break the law and harbor illegal aliens, is not fiction. Why not speak out and protest that?

I am. Search my posts.

55 posted on 04/11/2006 4:29:27 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

This is what you Christians get for not beheading a few heathens now and then. You don't see Tom Hanks making this kind of movie about Mohommed, now do you.


56 posted on 04/11/2006 4:30:37 PM PDT by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Connie Cardullo
I haven't read it and know nothing about it. What is anti-Christian about the Da Vinci Code?

I haven't read it either, but as I understand, it presents an alternative ending to the gospel story whereby Jesus gets married and the church is complicit in hiding this from the world.

57 posted on 04/11/2006 4:32:48 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
it sure makes a person look stoopid, all things considered.

Why? If Jesus was called 'Rabbi' (and he was); a Rabbi must be married (by Jewish Talmudic laws). Jesus was called 'Rabbi' by Peter (Mark 9:5; 11:21), by Judas (Matthew 26:25,49), and by Nathanael (John 1:49), and other disciples (John 1:38; 4:31; 9:2; 11:8), He acknowledged the title without dispute.Great masses of the people also called Him "Rabbi" (John 6:25); and when Nicodemus, a Pharisee, and a ruler of the Jews acknowledged Jesus as "Rabbi", it was conclusive evidence that Jesus was a Jewish Rabbi (John 3:1-2).

So, again why is anyone who would suppose that Christ was married be considered 'stoopid'. Jesus was a Jew, and as such followed certain perscribed dietary restrictions, was held to certain acts of conduct, and observed traditional Jewish customs.

Again, why is supposing that Jesus Christ was married such a leap? Why does that cause people to question his message?

58 posted on 04/11/2006 4:37:07 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AnnoyedOne

A very concise and factual post. BUMP!


59 posted on 04/11/2006 4:41:49 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Yes, but their writings and beliefs are still in the historical record.


60 posted on 04/11/2006 4:45:10 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson