Methinks the WCC feels more than a little threatened by the "megachurches"!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Aussie Dasher
It may be a case of the pot calling the kettle black, but regardless, he makes a good point.
50 posted on
02/22/2006 6:27:20 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Aussie Dasher
THE head of the World Council of Churches has expressed concern about the spread of megachurches around the world, such as Hillsong in Sydney, saying they could lead to a Christianity that is "two miles long and one inch deep". Wassamatter? Not enough witchcraft being taught to make the WCC happy?
52 posted on
02/22/2006 6:29:00 AM PST by
Alex Murphy
(Colossians 4:5)
To: Aussie Dasher
Methinks they realise that they're losing out to The Catholic Church on the one hand (that teaches Church philosophy) and to the mega-song and dance productions on the other
55 posted on
02/22/2006 7:02:18 AM PST by
Cronos
(Never forget 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia! Ultra-Catholic)
To: Aussie Dasher
If the World Council of Churches is against it, I am for it.
58 posted on
02/22/2006 7:18:19 AM PST by
Tribune7
To: Aussie Dasher
Yes, they are shallow.
It's all SHOW and no TELL.
60 posted on
02/22/2006 7:23:32 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
To: Aussie Dasher
The WCC should welcome the PDCs. Since they have no theological grounding, these members will be easy to suck into their folds.
This is perhaps my biggest complaint about Warren and his PDC movement. They focus on meeting social needs, but theology is weak. Most of these, including ministers, if you asked them for the reasons they believe what they believe, they have no solid answer.
Can they cite verses concerning the Virgin Birth? Eternal Security? Reliabilty of the Scriptures? Salvation? THe return of Christ?
When you press them for answers, they sputter and seek to get out of the conversation calling you to narrow-minded.
Weak Christian leaders will only give birth to weak Christians. This is why most Christians cannot defend Genesis Creation and why they fall flat on their faces when they are told that the Church fought the idea of a round earth.
61 posted on
02/22/2006 7:32:47 AM PST by
Sensei Ern
(Now, IB4Z! http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy/ "I believe Hillary is the aunti-christ.")
To: Aussie Dasher
The megachurches expose thousands upon thousands of "unchurched" people to God's love, mercy, & grace. What a shallow thing to do....
To: Aussie Dasher
I am not a fan of megachurches, myself. I agree that their theology is shallow.
But is that worse than a wide, deep theology that is completely wrong and will send people on the path to perdition? I refer, of course, to the liberal theology of modern main-stream Protestant churches and that of liberal Catholics. I don't know enough about the Orthodox to make a judgment, but they seem fairly sound for the most part.
I come from a conservative, evangelical background myself, and find that it satisfies my needs.
69 posted on
02/22/2006 8:12:38 AM PST by
chesley
(Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
To: Aussie Dasher
THE head of the World Council of Churches has expressed concern about the spread of megachurches around the world, such as Hillsong in Sydney, saying they could lead to a Christianity that is "two miles long and one inch deep". I usually don't agree with the WCC, but this time they're right!
84 posted on
02/22/2006 9:28:34 AM PST by
sauropod
("All you get is controversy, crap and confusion." Alan Simpson defining the WH Pimp Corps.)
To: Aussie Dasher
The megachurches simply wanted individuals to feel good about themselves, he said.And what does the WCC do with all that ecumenical cr........er ............... stuff?
To: Aussie Dasher; All
While I dislike the WCC, in this case, they are right.
Megachurches do not allow for true doctrinal agreement on major, divisive issues in Christianity.
Only denominations do that.
98 posted on
02/22/2006 10:36:05 AM PST by
rwfromkansas
(http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
To: Aussie Dasher
132 posted on
02/22/2006 2:55:34 PM PST by
Rightly Biased
(Valor is a Gift.Those having it never know for sure whether they have it till the test comes)
To: Aussie Dasher
It floors me how people still think of church as what happens on Sunday. Granted, what the preacher says on Sunday should be Biblically sound and accurate, but thats not where the church begins and ends. True religion/spirituality happens 24/7 - its the honest relationships that occur throughout the week, including Sunday, that make a church.
If people are looking to get all their Biblical knowledge during a one-hour sermon on Sundays, they are in trouble. More than what a WCC or a "megachurch" can offer or fix.
I've attended a number of churches in my short 30 years on this earth, and the most sound spiritual mentoring and guidance I got was at non-denominational megachurches. But thats only my anecdotal experience :-)
To: Aussie Dasher
And just what theology does WCC follow?
157 posted on
02/22/2006 7:58:51 PM PST by
tiki
To: Aussie Dasher
Where does the WCC earn the right to comment on the "depth" of any church? They have, for the most part, abandoned orthodox Christianity - in many cases denying the most basic doctrines of historic Christianity!
161 posted on
02/22/2006 9:18:09 PM PST by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: Aussie Dasher
It's got to be the fact that we actually believe in Christ and have small group bible study and support groups. The WCC supports queers, dikes, animal lovers, gaia worship, gay marriage, gay adoption and their churches are empty. Guess WHy Bis-hop!
171 posted on
02/23/2006 5:35:36 PM PST by
STD
(Grab Your Ankles, I'm From the Gub'ment)
To: Aussie Dasher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson