Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REVEALED! THE VATICAN MASTERMINDED 9-11
Memri via Envoy Mag ^ | June 9, 2005 | Patrick Madrid

Posted on 06/09/2005 1:34:50 PM PDT by siunevada

Egyptian Historian on Saudi Iqra TV: The Vatican's Mission of Destroying Islam was Delegated to the U.S. – Which Carried Out 9/11 on Assignment by the World Council of Churches.

The following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian historian Professor Zaynab Abd Al-Aziz, which aired on Saudi Iqra TV(1) on May 26, 2005. [To view this clip from MEMRI TV visit http://www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=708 ]

Abd Al-Aziz: "The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965."

Host: "Huh?"

Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. A long time ago." [Ah, so that's the real meaning of "interreligious dialogue."]

Host: "They decided to Christianize the world?"

Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. The decisions of the 1965 Vatican Council included, first of all, absolving the Jews of the blood of Christ. This decision is well known and was the basis for the recognition of the occupying Zionist entity -- Israel. The second decision was to eradicate the left in the eighties. [Naw. Zaynab, you have it backwards. In the 80s, the left was trying to eradicate the right, at least in most Catholic parishes I saw]. I believe we've all witnessed this. The third decision was to eradicate Islam, so that the world would be Christianized by the third millennium." [Since when is Islam in any way "the left"?]

Host: "Why is America hostile to Islam, although we never had and never will have the same conflict with them we had with Europe?" [Never say never. In fact, we are in the opening stages of that kind of conflict right now. Remember that 9-11 thing?]

Abd Al-Aziz: "Well, do you remember what we just said about the Second Vatican Council in 1965 and about Christianizing the world? [No. It flew right out of my head when you started in on Zionism and the Jews]. It was agreed upon and pre-arranged. John Paul II prepared a five-year plan, on the eve of the third millennium, Christianize the world. His address in 1995 was based on the assumption that by the year 2000, the entire world would be Christianized. [Well, hey, man, cut us some slack. We're working on it.] Since the plan was not accomplished, the World Council of Churches assigned this mission to the US in January 2001, since the US is the world's unrivaled military power. They named the decade between 2001-2010 "the age of eradicating evil" – "evil" referring to Islam and Muslims.

"The Crusader war is ongoing, because it has been a religious war since the dawn of Islam. [Not exactly. The Crusades were launched as a response to the wars of conquest against Christians perpetrated by Muslims]. Later, colonialism, missionaries, and Christianization were introduced. The Crusader war is ongoing. The Inquisition courts exist to this day. [If that's true, then when can we get an appointment booked for Fr. Richard McBrien and Sr. Joan Chittister?] As I told you, the pope who was appointed a few days ago, headed the Inquisition Court, which is now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

"When in January 2001, the World Council of Churches delegated this mission to the US - what did the US do? It fabricated the show of… is it September 9 or 11?"

Host: "11. Please explain this to me."

Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, of course . . .” [But first, better take another hit from that bong.]

Host: "You mean to say that the World Council of Churches delegated the mission of Christianizing of the world to the US."

Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. And how could the US win legitimacy for this without anyone saying that they are perpetrating massacres and waging a Crusader war? It fabricated the 9/11 show. I call it a fabrication because much has been written on this. We are also to blame. Why do we accept a single perspective? Countless books were written, some of which were even translated into Arabic, like Thierry Meyssan's 9/11 – The Appalling Fraud [2] and Pentagate. "Pentagate" like Watergate… He brings documents to prove that the method used in destroying the three (sic) towers was "controlled demolition.

"This is an architectural engineering theory, which was invented by the Americans. They teach it in their universities. They make movies and documentaries about it. They incorporated it in movie scenarios and then carried it out in real life. Why do we accept this?"

Host: "My God, doctor. This is unbelievable! You're saying that this destruction…"

Abd Al-Aziz: "...was a controlled demolition. The building collapsed in its place, without hitting a single building to its left or right. The three towers fell in place."

Host: "In the same method they use in movies and plays?"

Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, Exactly like that. That is how the US won international legitimacy. You could sense the (9/11) operation was pre-planned because many things were revealed in the days that followed. For example 4,000 Jews caught influenza on that exact day. They set a timer, and all 4,000…"

Host: "By God, you crack me up! They all set a timer and got influenza on the same day. So the building was completely empty of Jews."

Abd Al-Aziz: "Much has been written about this. 150 Congressmen demanded an inquiry."

---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD92005


TOPICS: Catholic; Humor
KEYWORDS: tinfoilturbanalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: cripplecreek
This should push a few more Catholics over to our side.

Huh?

21 posted on 06/09/2005 3:47:06 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

I should have said euro Catholics. I mean the people who have opposed America at every turn but will not be happy to see the Vatican blamed. It may open a few eyes.


22 posted on 06/09/2005 3:52:02 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: siunevada
Abd Al-Aziz: "The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965."

Oh dear. Somebody ought to give him a subscription to National Catholic Reporter.

23 posted on 06/09/2005 5:12:42 PM PDT by Loyalist (No confidence in Mr. Dithers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Abd Al-Aziz: "The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965."

The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made at Pentecost 2000 years ago.

The decision to do away with that apparently unreasonable idea was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965.
24 posted on 06/09/2005 9:26:11 PM PDT by sempertrad ("I can't show my face in there...after that 'zah' incident..." - MST3K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

By Gosh Pinky!!! Did you see this? No wonder my plan for world domination is thwarted at every turn!!! The Vatican has beat me to it. Quick I must have a plan!!!

The Brain


25 posted on 06/10/2005 5:02:30 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; Publius6961

"I should have said euro Catholics. I mean the people who have opposed America at every turn but will not be happy to see the Vatican blamed. It may open a few eyes."

These euros will hardly be real Catholics anyway in this age. They wouldn't care if the Vatican is blamed for whatever.


26 posted on 06/10/2005 6:13:32 AM PDT by NZerFromHK ("US libs...hypocritical, naive, pompous...if US falls it will be because of these" - Tao Kit (HK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sempertrad

Not "impose", sempertrad. "Propose". The Church is not a democracy, but she is not a dictatorship either.


27 posted on 06/10/2005 6:41:52 AM PDT by Romulus (Der Inn fließt in den Tiber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

Zarqawi sold me a Bug Gulp and two packs of smokes at the 7-11 down the street today. He's working the day shift behind the counter.


28 posted on 06/10/2005 6:44:39 AM PDT by Allegra (Got a Weird New Keyboard. Please Excuse Any Typos. Fingers are Not Acclimated Yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

I feel sad for the people that this message is going to. They are being snowed.


29 posted on 06/10/2005 6:57:36 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siunevada
Time ofr a new hat.

Maybe a friend has some aircraft grade aluminum around.

Suddenly Reynold's Wrap just isn't cutting it anymore...

30 posted on 06/10/2005 7:00:53 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

Well, you did know the Pope's secretary was Dziewicz, didn't you?

(It's gotta be da Dziewz!)


31 posted on 06/10/2005 8:19:17 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

There are plenty of American Christians who will tell you that the Vatican is a Jewish plot to resurrect the Empire of Babylon.


32 posted on 06/10/2005 8:20:22 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Not "impose", sempertrad. "Propose".

im-pose:
1. To establish or apply as compulsory; levy: impose a tax. 2. To apply or make prevail by or as if by authority: impose a peace settlement.

Did Our Lord not want to "establish or apply as compulsory" His Church? Did He not have the "authority" to do this? Did He want His Church to "prevail"?

If the Second Vatican Council was, as many say, doctrinal, and thus requires our obedience, did it not impose upon Catholic States to give up on the principle of only recognizing the Catholic religion?
33 posted on 06/10/2005 9:42:29 AM PDT by sempertrad ("I can't show my face in there...after that 'zah' incident..." - MST3K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sempertrad

Christianity is not Islam.


34 posted on 06/10/2005 10:06:07 AM PDT by Romulus (Der Inn fließt in den Tiber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Christianity is not Islam.

Precisely. And Mahomet is still dead, dead, dead.

But Jesus Christ -- who was and is and is to come -- is very much alive and even Muslims if they know their faith know Jesus is alive and Mahomet is dead as dead can be.

35 posted on 06/10/2005 10:29:38 AM PDT by Siobhan ("Whenever you come to save Rome, make all the noise you want." -- Pius XII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Does Christ the King not have the right to rule society? Does He have no right to impose His Law on society? It is only to the Roman Catholic Church He gave the grave obligation of carrying out this task. How can we as Catholics say that God has no authority outside of the Church He founded?
36 posted on 06/10/2005 11:51:59 AM PDT by sempertrad ("I can't show my face in there...after that 'zah' incident..." - MST3K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sempertrad

Please get a grip. No one is quarrelling about the authority of Christus Rex. This is about your idiotic triumphalist ecclesiology. The Church has never intended that the Good News be force-fed to the world willy-nilly. God does not want slaves.


37 posted on 06/10/2005 12:37:05 PM PDT by Romulus (Der Inn fließt in den Tiber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
I have a grip, thanks. This is obvious by the fact that I don't resort to unkind words (i.e. "idiotic") when my point of view is challenged.

triumphalist:
The attitude or belief that a particular doctrine, especially a religion or political theory, is superior to all others.

Well, then color me an idiot. I happen to think that Catholic doctrine and religion are superior to all others. I'd like to think that a Church Who claims to be the only Ark of Salvation agrees with me. Does She, Romulus?

The Church has never intended that the Good News be force-fed to the world willy-nilly.

I'm not talking about force-feeding the world, either. I'm talking about Her right to be recognized in society as opposed to lumping Her in with all other churches and religions and the V2 Fathers who are just fine with that.
38 posted on 06/10/2005 2:20:48 PM PDT by sempertrad ("I can't show my face in there...after that 'zah' incident..." - MST3K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

And here all this time I thought it was Elvis that was the mastermind with the aid of space aliens


39 posted on 06/10/2005 2:22:04 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Advertisments contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sempertrad
I'm not talking about force-feeding the world, either.

im-pose:
1. To establish or apply as compulsory

Res ipsa loquitur.

40 posted on 06/10/2005 2:54:44 PM PDT by Romulus (Der Inn fließt in den Tiber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson