Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bishop pulls no punches in letter responding to hand wringing "Catholics"
Diocsesecs.org Bishop's column ^ | June 2004 | Bishop Sheridan

Posted on 06/08/2004 11:32:22 AM PDT by AAABEST

The reactions to my recent pastoral letter on the duties of Catholic politicians and voters were overwhelming in many more ways than one. I was edified by the many messages of support for what I wrote. I was distressed by those who misread and misrepresented what I wrote. I was deeply saddened by those who said that they understood very well what the Church teaches, but had chosen to disregard it. And there were those who raised thoughtful questions regarding the Church’s teaching on capital punishment and war. I will deal with these issues in my next column. For now I think it is important to clarify some misunderstandings and erroneous conclusions that have been drawn from my letter.

The most serious misrepresentation of my letter was the conclusion drawn by many that I or other ministers of Holy Communion would refuse the sacrament to people who voted in a particular way. Nowhere in the letter do I say this or even suggest it. The intent of the letter was to appeal to the consciences of Catholic people as they prepare to vote in November. I called upon Catholics to recognize that our vote, while always a private act, has public consequences for good or evil. This means that my vote must be cast with a conscience well-informed as to good and evil. This, I believe, is sound Catholic teaching and common sense.

The Church has taught from the beginning that when Catholics sin seriously they must refrain from receiving Holy Communion until they have repented and been absolved in the Sacrament of Penance (confession). In fact this teaching has been repeated in the most recent writings of the Holy Father on the relationship between the Eucharist and Penance. If a Catholic votes in bad conscience, especially in matters that have to do with the sanctity of life (e.g. abortion), how can this be anything other than a participation in that sinful act? It is at this point that the Church calls upon sinners to withhold themselves from receiving Holy Communion until they have been forgiven of their sins. This is a far cry from denying someone Communion. How, in fact, could I deny anyone Holy Communion since I would not know the condition of the communicant’s soul?

It seems that an incorrect notion of conscience is at the bottom of much of the misunderstanding. Many who registered their disagreement with my letter made it clear that, in spite of what the Church teaches about the meaning of conscience, for these people conscience would always be a matter of deeply held opinions, some of which may even conflict with Church teaching. In the end, however, it would be personal opinion that would win out over divinely revealed truth. This way of thinking effectively does away with any meaningful notion of conscience and reduces everything to personal preference. For a Catholic, the only authentic meaning of a well-informed conscience is one which relies on the truth of Jesus Christ as that truth has been received and taught by the Catholic Church. I repeat here what I quoted from the Catechism of the Catholic Church in my letter: “The Church, the ‘pillar and bulwark of the truth,’ ‘has received this solemn command of Christ from the apostles to announce the saving truth’ (1 Tim 3:15). ‘To the Church belongs the right always and everywhere to announce moral principles, including those pertaining to the social order, and to make judgments on any human affairs to the extent that they are required by the fundamental rights of the human person or the salvation of souls’” (#2032). Conscience, for the Catholic, must be informed by the teachings of the Church. In other words, conscience does not invent truth. Conscience discovers the truth that has been revealed by God.

To those, then, who said that the Church teaches that we must follow our consciences, I say TRUE. But only a well-formed and informed conscience may be followed. Put bluntly, anyone who says he has a well-formed conscience that stands opposed to the most fundamental moral teachings of our Church simply does NOT have a well-formed conscience. And let’s not appeal to Vatican II to pretend that we do.

Having attempted these clarifications, I would like to answer some of the important questions that were raised by those who read my letter:

Won’t your letter be the cause of some people leaving the Church?

I hope not. That certainly was not the intent. However, some people have said that they will leave the Church. They will leave because they will not abide a bishop “telling them what to do”. Let’s be clear and honest. I have done nothing more than explain the teaching of the Church, which is the truth. If the truth causes people to abandon the greatest gift they will ever receive, viz., membership in Christ’s Body the Church, I feel deeply sorry for them.

I cannot help but think of Jesus’ teaching His followers the truth of the Eucharist (cf. John 6). He told them in no uncertain terms that He would give them His flesh to eat and His blood to drink. St. John tells us that this teaching was unacceptable to some of Jesus’ followers: “This sort of talk is hard to endure! How can anyone take it seriously?” And “from that time on, many of his disciples broke away and would not remain in his company any longer.”

The truth of God can be divisive. Jesus foretold this. Truth is especially divisive when it challenges opinions that we hold dear. Jesus wanted his followers to accept His truth rather than their own opinions. Some did and some did not. But Jesus never stopped teaching the truth. And the Church will never stop teaching the truth.

Should the Eucharist be used as a weapon to force certain behaviors or punish others?

Of course not. But this is how my letter has been misrepresented. In hearing from some Catholics I learned that there is a certain way of thinking that suggests that the Eucharist has little or no relationship to the way we live our lives in the world. It seemed beyond comprehension to them that anything should ever separate them from the Eucharist. This way of thinking comes as no surprise if we simply take note of the fact that everyone receives Holy Communion on Sunday and almost no one goes to confession.

Turning to Sacred Scripture once again, we recall St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians in which the apostle expresses his concern that some in the Corinthian community were receiving the Eucharist unworthily. He had heard of behavior in the community that was so contrary to Christian teaching that he told the Corinthians to examine their consciences well. He did not hesitate to write that “whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup unworthily sins against the body and blood of the Lord” (1 Cor. 11:27). The Church has always held that a Catholic must approach Holy Communion in the state of grace. Anything less is a sacrilege.

This, of course, is where the disagreement occurs. Some people have written to me and said that nothing or no one outside of themselves can determine the moral significance of their actions. They alone would decide what is right and what is wrong. This stance, claimed as Catholic, ignores Jesus’ constitution of His Church and the Church’s teaching authority. Jesus said to Peter: “I will entrust to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you declare bound on earth shall be bound in heaven; whatever you declare loosed on earth shall be loosed in heaven” (Matt. 16:19). Again, as Catholics we live under a divinely established law. It is this law that must guide our every actionl.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science
KEYWORDS: abortion; bishop; catholic; catholiclist; communion; politicians; prolife; sheridan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Put bluntly, anyone who says he has a well-formed conscience that stands opposed to the most fundamental moral teachings of our Church simply does NOT have a well-formed conscience. And let’s not appeal to Vatican II to pretend that we do.

w00t!
This guy is a straight shooter, God bless him. If he were in my diocese I might think about attending NO-masses again.
1 posted on 06/08/2004 11:32:29 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
If he were in my diocese I might think about attending NO-masses again.

I don't know about that but he is inspiring.

2 posted on 06/08/2004 11:49:08 AM PDT by Fifthmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: AAABEST

Now that's what I'm talkin' about!

A good, holy, TEACHING bishop.......so very refreshing indeed.

Let's clone him! (ah, okay....unethical)


4 posted on 06/08/2004 12:09:41 PM PDT by undirish01 (Go Irish! If only we can get the theology dept. turned around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

Yep. I am glad to see him speaking what has gone unspoken for far too long.


5 posted on 06/08/2004 12:10:08 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

I will gladly kiss his ring. An authentic Shepherd. This is exactly what the Church needs.


6 posted on 06/08/2004 12:32:08 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
If he were in my diocese I might think about attending NO-masses again.

I wouldn't rush too quickly to that. He inherited a mess of pottage from Bishop Hanifen. There is a LOT of work to be done before the N.O. is worth any attention in this diocese.
7 posted on 06/08/2004 4:08:58 PM PDT by thrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Praise God, from Whom all blessings flow!

The time for the good shepherds to rise up is at hand. And it is the time for the hired hands and mitered wolves to fall. Oh how the Lavender Mafia will wail and gnash its teeth.

What a wonderful time to live, for the restoration of Holy Mother Church is at hand! I know it will come slowly, but not as slowly as the predators and devils would like. Hallelujah!
8 posted on 06/08/2004 4:21:20 PM PDT by broadsword (Liberalism is the societal AIDS virus that thwarts our national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp IV; NYer; Salvation; cpforlife.org; ultima ratio; Land of the Irish; ...
Ping to the pingers.

Some good news, this Bishop is very inspiring.

If anyone would like to send an note thanking him his email is phoward@diocs.org

If anyone would like to make a donation to counter the donations the leftists and baby killers are withholding, or you would like to phone or write, contact information is here.

We should show our support Bishop Sheridan, if only by a quick email note.

9 posted on 06/08/2004 4:42:59 PM PDT by AAABEST (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

"The truth of God can be divisive. Jesus foretold this. Truth is especially divisive when it challenges opinions that we hold dear. Jesus wanted his followers to accept His truth rather than their own opinions. Some did and some did not. But Jesus never stopped teaching the truth. And the Church will never stop teaching the truth."

Wait a minute. What happened to "unity in diversity", and "building a civilization of love"?
Truth, what is that?


10 posted on 06/08/2004 6:08:06 PM PDT by AskStPhilomena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Salvation; Canticle_of_Deborah; sandyeggo; american colleen; Polycarp IV; Desdemona; ...

Defenders Ping!


11 posted on 06/08/2004 6:25:58 PM PDT by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
anyone who says he has a well-formed conscience that stands opposed to the most fundamental moral teachings of our Church simply does NOT have a well-formed conscience...

All I can (inarticulately) say is: Wow!

12 posted on 06/08/2004 6:35:53 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

###"Of course not. But this is how my letter has been misrepresented. In hearing from some Catholics I learned that there is a certain way of thinking that suggests that the Eucharist has little or no relationship to the way we live our lives in the world. It seemed beyond comprehension to them that anything should ever separate them from the Eucharist. This way of thinking comes as no surprise if we simply take note of the fact that everyone receives Holy Communion on Sunday and almost no one goes to confession.

Turning to Sacred Scripture once again, we recall St. Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians in which the apostle expresses his concern that some in the Corinthian community were receiving the Eucharist unworthily. He had heard of behavior in the community that was so contrary to Christian teaching that he told the Corinthians to examine their consciences well. He did not hesitate to write that “whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup unworthily sins against the body and blood of the Lord” (1 Cor. 11:27). The Church has always held that a Catholic must approach Holy Communion in the state of grace. Anything less is a sacrilege."###

This is what it is all about.


13 posted on 06/08/2004 6:40:39 PM PDT by franky (Pray for the souls of the faithful departed. Pray for our own souls to receive the grace of a happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
We should show our support Bishop Sheridan, if only by a quick email note.

Good idea. I just sent him a note.

14 posted on 06/08/2004 6:46:09 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
We should show our support Bishop Sheridan, if only by a quick email note.

Wilco.

15 posted on 06/08/2004 7:21:31 PM PDT by Barnacle (Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

Vintage Sheridan. Shoots from the hip and follows up later.

When he was our pastor, stuff like this happened a lot. He makes a move and doesn't expect people to take it badly and then corrects the record.

But he's always in the right.


16 posted on 06/08/2004 7:31:56 PM PDT by Desdemona (Kempis' Imitation of Christ online! http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/imitation/imitation.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

Bwwwaaaa.... I want to move to Colorado... This is exactly the response I think our bishops should take... put the cards firmly on the table, but don't make martyrs out of the pro-aborts.


17 posted on 06/08/2004 7:38:02 PM PDT by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

Wow. We so rarely hear bishops teaching the faith this clearly and boldly. Loud applause in his direction.


18 posted on 06/08/2004 7:39:49 PM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST

This Bishop's explanations were very lucid and direct. Thank you for the ping.

Can you post his next column explaining the Church's stand on the death penalty and war and give me ping?


19 posted on 06/08/2004 8:23:29 PM PDT by Flora McDonald (Stand the Storm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
BRAVO!!!!! It's so refreshing to read something like this from a Catholic bishop. I'm totally 'Vatican Twoed out' and I am starving for some authentic Catholic teaching.
20 posted on 06/08/2004 9:42:18 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson