Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DFU SONG: Weekend in New England (weekend before Recall)
DFU SONG PARODIES | 10-2003 | Lyrics, Doug from Upland

Posted on 10/05/2003 7:51:21 PM PDT by doug from upland

MIDI - WEEKEND IN NEW ENGLAND

Last night we heard her cry...she shed a tear
Her husband is finished...expulsion is near

We're wondering how he plans to leave their place
So will it be in a limo...be in an airplane...maybe a slow Bronco chase
Gray Davis, you've been a disgrace

He's getting desperate with...last minute slime
With help of the a-hoes...at the L.A. TIMES

We're wondering how he plans to leave their place
So will it be in a limo...be in an airplane...maybe a slow Bronco chase
Gray Davis, you've been a disgrace

RATS see things turning...and panic's set in
They know what is coming...the audits soon will begin
They've spent all our money like tomorrow won't come
They think that we'll take it...and that we're all dumb

So, Gray, will it be in a limo...pehaps in an airplane...maybe a slow Bronco chase
Gray Davis, you've been a...................................disgrace
A disgrace


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dirtytricks; graywontbeback; hastalavistababy; laslimes; runningman; slowspeedbronco; terminator; totalrecall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2003 7:51:22 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
GOOD JOB!!
2 posted on 10/05/2003 7:54:02 PM PDT by YepYep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

 

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
THANKS!


3 posted on 10/05/2003 7:55:26 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Great as ever! I do think this will be as the Clinton's departure from the White House, kicking and screaming and grabbing the silver!
4 posted on 10/05/2003 7:58:21 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YepYep
Barry Manilow fan? That a-ho is a big RAT who doesn't like our commander in chief.
5 posted on 10/05/2003 7:58:40 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Davis is shredding --- CLICK.
6 posted on 10/05/2003 7:59:56 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Neat Doug, I wonder if Hillery told Davis her ARNOLD CAPER would backfire in the L.A.Slime? She told him "It worked on W's election(last minute 30 year DWI ticket)".
7 posted on 10/05/2003 8:01:32 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
The word "audit" never sounded so sweet.
8 posted on 10/05/2003 8:11:49 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dutchess; Looking4Truth; solzhenitsyn; Paul Atreides; rockfish59; StarFan; RobFromGa; whoever
Pinging the song list.
9 posted on 10/05/2003 8:18:02 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Streisand and Manilow fundraiser for the RATS -- CLICK.
10 posted on 10/05/2003 8:20:24 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Why support someone who publicly dismissed Clinton's actions as inconsequential and opposed impeachment?
11 posted on 10/05/2003 9:01:10 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
You just won't it give up. Thanks for bringing it to my song thread. David Schippers, a hero of mine, twice voted for Clinton. Many of the gutless GOP didn't want Clinton convicted and didn't work very hard to make it happen. I guess they should all resign.

I am going to hold my hose and vote for Arnold. WE HAVE TO GET RID OF GRAY DAVIS AND PUT SOMEONE IN THERE WHO WILL AUDIT THE BOOKS AND START VETOING RAT LEGISLATION. You just can't accept that McClintock cannot win. You are living in a dream world. When I was 16, I worked in the Goldwater campaign. I kept hoping and hoping and hoping that just another 10% of people would change their minds. It didn't happen. Goldwater actually said some nice things about Clinton at the end of his life. I guess I should trash Barry's memory. There is such thing as political reality, no matter how distasteful. We'll do the best we can with what we get. Some Nader voters thought he was electable. Yes, some really did.

12 posted on 10/05/2003 9:47:38 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
You just can't accept that McClintock cannot win.

I accept that.

Why vote for someone who cared not a whit about Clinton's behavior and said he was ashamed to be a Republican.

How can you vote for someone who said publicly in a magainze interview:

I was ashamed to call myself a Republican during that period...Instead of devoting all this energy and all these hearings to how we're going to solve the problems of the inner cities . . . No, it's like, 'This man has to be removed from office because he's a national threat.' Yeah, that's a good one.

Solving the inner city problems -- yeah, that's a good one.

If you think someone who could not recognize Clinton as a national threat, be my guest.

I won't.

13 posted on 10/05/2003 9:54:12 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I am disappointed that he did not support impeachment. He was wrong. He is wrong on many issues. At least I'm glad you recognize that Tom will not be elected governor in this cycle.

So what do we now do? Let the RATS keep spending us into bankruptcy? A principled vote is fine. I can respect it. Unfortunately, our state will never get its bond ratings up until someone with fiscal responsibility is in charge. I hope Arnold can do that. For the first time in my life, and I've lived here since 1953, I have given serious consideration to leaving California. The RATS and the illegal invasion are making life almost intolerable. If Arnold is the only one who can win, I want him to have a chance. I hope the party can get him on the right side of some of the social issues.

14 posted on 10/05/2003 10:03:21 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The reason McClintock won't win is beacuse his supporters -- those who normally would vote for him -- people like you and mee -- have been sold a bill of goods that he 'can't win".

You gave up.

15 posted on 10/05/2003 10:10:18 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
No, the reason he won't win is because California does not have enough voters who believe in his ideas. In this state, there are simply not enough fiscal and social conservatives.

Isa was arrested on more than one occasions. Would he be disqualified?

16 posted on 10/05/2003 10:30:02 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
No, the reason he won't win is because California does not have enough voters who believe in his ideas.

Polls say otherwise -- at least in this recall election.

And I'd vote for Riordan if he were there, not Schwarzenegger.

Still. If this is what you believe: Why not then just vote democrat?

I still see it as you gave up. It seems like you don't really believe in everything you've been saying and doing for these so many years. That's what it seems like. I'm sure you disagree, but to many others it seems this way.

If you want to vote for a liberal pro-Clinton politician, feel free.

I will not be though.

17 posted on 10/05/2003 10:38:17 PM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"And I'd vote for Riordan if he were there, not Schwarzenegger."

"If you want to vote for a liberal pro-Clinton politician, feel free."
================================

This is deliciously ironic, and you probably aren't even paying attention to what you are saying. DUH, Riordan gave money to Clinton's campaign. DUH, Riordan is pro-choice and liberal. So, please, the next time you say "If you want to vote for a liberal pro-Clinton politician, feel free," let's hope you are looking in the mirror.

18 posted on 10/06/2003 6:17:32 AM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I'm aware of all those things. It makes a point about Schwarzenegger. It says your argument would fly for other candidates -- but not Schwarzenegger.

Still, in reality I am not voting for Riordan, but you say you are voting for Schwarzenegger.

As I said, Doug, how can you vote for the man who said he is ashamed to be a Republican because of people like you.

I am not vopting for this pro-Clinton anti-impeachment Hollywood liberal.

You can, of course. You are welcome to it.

19 posted on 10/06/2003 7:52:51 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
You didn't pay attention to what I said. You admit that you would vote for Riordan -- liberal, pro-Clinton. Then you criticize me for voting for Arnold -- liberal, pro-Clinton (at least according to you during impeachment).
20 posted on 10/06/2003 8:01:36 AM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson