Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH LIMBAUGH LIVE THREAD PREGAME SHOW

Posted on 10/03/2003 6:27:10 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine

Start your engines.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,066 next last
To: corkoman
Exactly.

Careful...thought police are on the prowl.

;^)

1,021 posted on 10/03/2003 1:14:10 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
but nobody will convience me drugs are a good thing

Then stop taking all drugs - no matter how bad the affliction you are hearby ordered to take no drugs.

Dont call me in the morning you rascally totalitarian.

1,022 posted on 10/03/2003 1:24:34 PM PDT by corkoman (did someone say cheese?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
if you can get past his accent

Whaddya mean by dat!

1,023 posted on 10/03/2003 1:24:59 PM PDT by katnip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; Jim Robinson
I'd be interested in what part you don't agree with JR's post.

I'll tell you what part bothers me (not that you asked).

When JR says, "I do not support the federal war on drugs," it implies that he might support smaller state-by-state wars on drugs. If this is the case, then JR's view ignores the spirit and plain wording of our state constitutions--as well as the federal constitution which guarantees a republican form of government to each state.

The state constitutions declare, like the federal constitution declares, that free republics are granted only limited powers and that the people reserve all other rights.

The socialistic idea that the people have granted the government the power to collectivize their bodies and meddle in their medical affairs is equally as repugnant to the spirit and plain language of their state bills of rights as it is to the federal bill of rights.

1,024 posted on 10/03/2003 1:31:30 PM PDT by Libertarian Billy Graham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1017 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
"If he's a servant of the truth, why doesn't he tell the truth? What's wrong with admitting that he has a drug problem?"

rush has the best hired the best lawyer in the business. there is no way he is going to be talking unless he tells him to talk.

today is friday, let's give him the weekend to regroup, relax, reflect and figure out what to say to his fans.



GRIN INDUCING QUOTE
"Listen, cupcake, whenever I need your help to best define "intelligent and reasoned debate", I will wring your neck."- martin gibson
1,025 posted on 10/03/2003 1:37:25 PM PDT by WillowyDame ("I like animals as much as the next guy, but if im hungry I'll eat a Panda"-HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian Billy Graham
I believe the U.S. Constitution leaves most matters concerning criminal law to the states. I think it would be up to the people in any given state through their state representives to make and enforce anti-drug laws, assuming they do not violate their state constitutions.
1,026 posted on 10/03/2003 1:38:57 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Can't be left out of this thread.

The telling tell is just how orgasmic the Elite Media are at the possibilities. They are not even trying to hide their jubilation.

1,027 posted on 10/03/2003 1:46:47 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
It's more than "allegations". As I said, there appears to be audio-taped evidence, email evidence and polygraph test results (though I think OJ once passed one of these so that doesn't say much...)

It isn't more than allegations. There "appears" to be audio taped evidence? What does the audio tape say? Who is saying it? What kind of quality is it? Have the voices been authenticated? The e-mails (at least some) were published. How do we KNOW that the e-mails were written by Rush? Did she have access to Rush's computer? The grammar, from the quotes I've seen on FR, is fairly sloppy. Who said they took a polygraph? Who gave it? What were the questions asked? Who interpreted it?

The media can say anything they wish. All things reported are not true.

1,028 posted on 10/03/2003 1:48:36 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 997 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
You forgot to tell me how I was going to rot in hell
1,029 posted on 10/03/2003 1:52:57 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1022 | View Replies]

To: WatchOutForSnakes
I'm referring strictly to the purchase and use of the pills. He certainly knows whether he ever did that or not.

Perhaps he doesn't. If he gave the maid cash and the Rx, who knows who she bought the pills from? (I believe Rush has said several times that he doesn't have insurance or that he doesn't use the insurance). If she bought them illegally, then he would have taken illegal pills.

If he came out and said, "I never bought illegal prescription medication" the media would focus on the "I" and the "bought". Did he send someone else to buy them? Did someone give him pills for free?

There are very few ways to win here.

1,030 posted on 10/03/2003 1:55:29 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1019 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
What does the audio tape say? Who is saying it? What kind of quality is it? Have the voices been authenticated? The e-mails (at least some) were published. How do we KNOW that the e-mails were written by Rush? Did she have access to Rush's computer? The grammar, from the quotes I've seen on FR, is fairly sloppy. Who said they took a polygraph? Who gave it? What were the questions asked? Who interpreted it?

Do yourself a favour and buy the magazine. I'm not your research assistant.

And how you work out the woman could have been using his computer is beyond me. Madison was joking, in case you didn't get it. She quit her job in July 2001. He was still emailing her in May 2002. Did she climb in through his window to email herself?

It occurs to me Rush could come out and admit this and you'd still say it wasn't true.

1,031 posted on 10/03/2003 2:00:28 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Chelsea for the Champions League!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin, "meatworld interface problems" ( Entropy Squared's quaint term for real life ) have kept me offline since this morning- so I am not up on the latest.

Last I heard, no-one had presented any evidence- just tall tales.

How Clintonian it all sounds.
To me, at least.

To be blunt, Rush knows if there is any truth to these stories, and IMO, he should lay out the truth and let the chips fall where they may. Again, IMO, there is a world of difference between popping pills, legal or not, and mugging old ladies to support a heroin habit.

I am inclined to disbelieve the whole thing as a smear job, and will until I see evidence to the contrary.

1,032 posted on 10/03/2003 2:08:04 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
Do yourself a favour and buy the magazine. I'm not your research assistant.

Great response...magazines never print things which aren't true, do they?

It occurs to me Rush could come out and admit this and you'd still say it wasn't true.

No, I am simply giving Rush the benefit of the doubt. At this time, being familiar with HIS credibility, I don't automatically believe people whose motives and truthfulness are not known.

It's far easier to be cynical. I could waffle around like most people here and say, "The story IS kinda fishy but....." and cover my ass if Rush ends up being a liar. I've made a deliberate decision to stand up for him. I think he has earned the benefit of the doubt by his past behavior.

1,033 posted on 10/03/2003 2:38:32 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
No, certainly magazines print things which aren't true. There are probably some inaccuracies in this story too.

But Rush's own remark today that when he does give his side of the story it might be too much information for some people (I'm paraphrasing because I can't remember the exact quote) suggests there is some substance to the Enquirer's account.

The couple have been granted immunity from prosecution. I wonder why the state attorney would offer them that kind of deal if they were just lying.

1,034 posted on 10/03/2003 2:52:21 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Chelsea for the Champions League!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
The couple have been granted immunity from prosecution. I wonder why the state attorney would offer them that kind of deal if they were just lying.

People who have been given immunity and then run to the tabloids and sell their story? Don't the police have a problem with that? (I don't know that they do, but I would hope the police frown on this behavior) The information may be a mix of truth and lies. They may be giving information about people other than Rush.

But Rush's own remark today that when he does give his side of the story it might be too much information for some people (I'm paraphrasing because I can't remember the exact quote) suggests there is some substance to the Enquirer's account.

ROFL!!! It suggests whatever you WANT it to suggest. It could also mean that Rush assumed he had people who hate him listening (reference to hackers of the dittocam at the beginning of the program....could be supporters who are cheating the system, could be haters hacking in, I dunno) and was referring to THEM "hearing more than they want to know".

See how easy it is to speculate?

1,035 posted on 10/03/2003 3:07:34 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
RUSH LIMBAUGH LIVE THREAD PREGAME SHOW

Looks like Rush forfeited the game...

1,036 posted on 10/03/2003 3:09:43 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
I'm reminded of Jack Nicholson's immortal line in A Few Good Men...
1,037 posted on 10/03/2003 3:14:20 PM PDT by jjbrouwer (Chelsea for the Champions League!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Ever consider that he might be stockpiling? Since a user's greatest risk at getting busted is through the purchase process, one would be wise to minimize the number of transactions

I made that point on one of yesterday's threads. Someone said I was making up stories. Minimizing exposure sure sounds like a reasonable explanation. Another reason for stocking up is in case your source disappears or gets busted. This is particularly true with overseas pharmacies, which start up and shut down like lightning bugs at dusk.

1,038 posted on 10/03/2003 3:25:15 PM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell (Hillary walks into a bar. Let's hope it leaves a nice bump on her forehead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: jjbrouwer
That's fine.

I try very hard to be a righteous person. I have to work at it sometimes. I posted earlier today that I had expected Rush to cancel out on his show and announce he was entering rehab. After listening to him today, I had a decision to make. Do I have any reason to believe these allegations are true? And I decided that, at this time, I really don't. There certainly IS a lot of smoke. Perhaps there is fire, MAYBE it's a raging inferno.

At the end of the day, I have to face myself. I'd be much more ashamed of cutting and running on a "friend" when the chips are down than standing steadfast and perhaps being a fool.

1,039 posted on 10/03/2003 3:28:45 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
Listening to Brokaw. Said Rush could be charged with as few as 16 pills of one type of these meds.
1,040 posted on 10/03/2003 3:55:11 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,066 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson