But Rush's own remark today that when he does give his side of the story it might be too much information for some people (I'm paraphrasing because I can't remember the exact quote) suggests there is some substance to the Enquirer's account.
The couple have been granted immunity from prosecution. I wonder why the state attorney would offer them that kind of deal if they were just lying.
People who have been given immunity and then run to the tabloids and sell their story? Don't the police have a problem with that? (I don't know that they do, but I would hope the police frown on this behavior) The information may be a mix of truth and lies. They may be giving information about people other than Rush.
But Rush's own remark today that when he does give his side of the story it might be too much information for some people (I'm paraphrasing because I can't remember the exact quote) suggests there is some substance to the Enquirer's account.
ROFL!!! It suggests whatever you WANT it to suggest. It could also mean that Rush assumed he had people who hate him listening (reference to hackers of the dittocam at the beginning of the program....could be supporters who are cheating the system, could be haters hacking in, I dunno) and was referring to THEM "hearing more than they want to know".
See how easy it is to speculate?