Posted on 10/01/2003 5:50:25 AM PDT by Theodore R.
Mass immigration: Suicide pill of the GOP
Posted: October 1, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Normally, the Census Bureau releases its Current Population Survey on a Tuesday, late in September, at the National Press Club. This year, the survey was released Friday afternoon, at the Census Bureau suburban headquarters in Suitland, Md.
When you see the numbers, you can appreciate why Karl Rove would want to get this behind us and move on.
In 2002, median household income in the United States fell for the second year in a row, from $42,900 to $42,409. The national decline was 1.1 percent, but among Hispanics, the fall-off was 2.9 percent.
The poverty rate – below $18,392 for a family of four – rose from 11.7 percent to 12.1 percent. But, among African-Americans, poverty rose from 22.7 percent to 24.1 percent of the population.
Certainly, the recession of 2001 and the "jobless recovery" go far toward explaining what the New York Times ominously described as "the second straight year of adverse changes in both poverty and income, the first two-year downtown since the early 1990s."
Like the Times, we all remember who was president in the early 1990s, as does George W. Bush.
But there are mega-trends in society that have been working for decades to keep the poverty numbers high and median incomes low. And though they feed the endless expansion of Big Government and prevent any downsizing of the Welfare State, these trends have been endorsed by a GOP Establishment that seems to be committing suicide in broad daylight.
The mega-trends are two: the deindustrialization of America, the direct result of a globalism preached and practiced by Bush Republicans, and mass immigration, also preached and promoted by Bush Republicans.
If you think these marginal changes in the Census Bureau's poverty and income figures are dramatic, consider these September statistics from the Center for Immigration Studies:
During the 1990s, the immigrant Hispanic population in the United States doubled – to 14 million. Total immigrant population grew from 19.6 million to 31 million.
The immigrant population from South Asia rose by 141 percent, and from sub-Sahara Africa by 174 percent.
We have in America today a nation within a nation, inexorably expanding, of peoples from continents and countries who have never been fully assimilated into any Western or First World country before.
Many of these folks arrived poor and unable to read, write or speak the English language. Almost all arrived with incomes well below the median of American families.
Their inclusion in Census figures must invariably pull the numbers downward. These numbers then serve as grist for the mills of those who say we must raise taxes for social programs to assist the newly poor among us.
Immigrants consume social services – welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies, free schools, prison cells – at rates far greater than our native-born. And as long as the immigrant poor continue pouring in, the great American Welfare State will be endlessly replenished with new recruits, and that Welfare State will never disappear.
That is as America's statists and liberals mean it to be. But why are conservatives and Republicans going along?
Under President Bush, perhaps 2.5 million immigrants, legal and illegal, entered the United States, as an identical number of factory jobs vanished. As we export factory jobs abroad, foreign nations export their poor here – to be fed, housed, medicated and schooled by U.S. taxpayers.
This is what they call "free trade."
Consider education.
With our native-born population stable, there is no need for new schools, except to replace old schools. New schools, the cost of which is paid by property taxes, sales taxes and state income taxes, are being built by taxpayers primarily for immigrant children, legal and illegal.
In 1960, when America was 97 percent native born, scholastic test scores rose every year. But as children from Third World countries arrive, less prepared linguistically and academically to learn, their test scores drag down average scores. And when the average test scores fall, the education lobby demands more funding "to get the test scores up," even as it demands open borders, which keep the test scores down.
And so the game goes on.
Then, when immigrant kids grow up to become U.S. citizens, they register and vote Democratic. In 1996, first-time Hispanic voters went for Clinton over the Dole-Kemp open-borders ticket 91 percent to 6 percent.
"The Tories are the stupid party," said John Stuart Mill. Wrong on many counts, J. S. sure nailed that one.
You are answering your own question, aren't you? So the dims can have their voter bloc...
And Pat would know very well what that's like.
At least 80% of the school children receive free breakfast and lunch.
Strange...I've always known the Hmong to be hardworking, self-sufficient people, and a fairly wealthy community nationally.
I might pay more heed to this line of complaint, if I couldn't go back and read very similar complaints from a century ago (and 130 years ago before that) complaining of all them damned poor folks coming over from Southern and Eastern Europe and Ireland.
Snidely
Some people can't even make it past the headline before their anti-Buchanan hysterics kick in.
Do you just hate Buchanan, or do you actually disagree with the points made in the article?
Did they get food stamps, section 8, medical asssistance, home owner assistance, government material written in their language?
I might pay more heed to this line of complaint
Maybe you might pay more heed if you lived next door to the 'new immigrants'. I have seen them destroy neighborhoods that they do not belong in because they didn't work to get there. They are not assimilated and our tax money put them there. Take a look and you'll see houses with doors off of the hinge, dirt for front yards, garbage all over, littering on other people's property, seven or eight loud cars coming and going every minute of the day.
We are losing a neighbor right now due to the two Hmong families on our block.
This is what people do when you give them things they didn't work for and are not ready to assume responsibility for.
To say that the Hmong people are hardworking is stereotyping and racist.
Don't hold your breath waiting for those guys to keep that part of any sort of a "bargain". Their answer to that is going to be something like:
Say WHAT? You paid for YOUR parents, therefore WE should pay for YOU???
and the whole system will be changed at that point. The only real retirement plan most baby boomers are going to need is some sort of a pistol to shoot themselves through the head when they get too old to work.
Aside from that, for my entire life on this planet, there have always been negative incentives for ordinary middle-class Americans to have children, and then they start bringing in multitudes which breed like rabbits? Where's the outrage?
I think the "recall Davis" fever/phenomenon in California constitutes less a harbinger of "conservatism" than an opportunity to "get even" with a politician that even po' folks don't like for having raised their car taxes (among other things). Like George Wallace said years ago, "send them a message". It really doesn't matter _what_ the "message" is, or to whom it is sent -- any chance for the public to strike back at the political shibboleth is sufficient.
In the years to come, I seriously doubt that even a popular figure like Swarzenegger will be electable as a "Republican", even in RINO clothing (which he wears well). California's demographics are changing fast, and they are moving in only one direction. Some folks are movin' in, others are movin' out. They ain't gonna go back where they were, not soon, not ever.
Having said that, I've come to the conclusion that it really doesn't matter much _who_ gets elected in California. The state's fate, it's "destination", remains the same no matter who is running the train. Obviously, with Swarzenegger at the throttle, he may slow down the ride some, but California is headed for the same destiny regardless.
Bustamante would speed the train up, whereas Arnold will try desparately to put the brakes on and hold it back. But the train will keep moving forward, inexhorably.
Cheers!
- John
I know it's wrong, but that line had me in stitches.
Both.
The truth is the truth, regardless of who speaks it, and whether you consider it to be a "hot button" or not.
Ok, we're making progress. What do you disagree with in the article? The idea that unchecked immigration can be problematic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.