Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Support Sink in Arizona
Arizona Tribune ^ | 09-26-03 | Le Templar

Posted on 09/26/2003 11:58:03 AM PDT by riri

Many Arizona voters are disgruntled with President Bush's handling of the economy and funding for the Iraq war and wouldn't re-elect him right now, according to a poll released Thursday by Arizona State University. Only 34 percent questioned during a weekend telephone survey would vote to give Bush a second term, according to the poll results. Forty-four percent said they would prefer someone else and 22 percent said they were undecided.

Bush's standing in Arizona has national implications |because |while |the president won the state in 2000, voters narrowly picked a Democratic governor last year.

"People have kind of looked at Arizona as a bellwether in a negative way," said Bruce Merrill, who conducted the ASU poll. "If Bush is in trouble in Arizona, he must be in trouble around the country."

Only 18 percent of Republicans said they would vote for someone else. But 72 percent of Democrats and 49 percent of independents said they didn't want Bush to have a second term.

Questions about specific issues revealed that 55 percent of those surveyed disapproved of Bush's handling of the economy and 52 percent didn't like the president's request to spend another $87 billion in Iraq and Afghanistan. But 64 percent approved of how Bush is addressing potential terrorist threats in the United States.

Republican Party officials said a decline in Bush's support was expected after reaching historic highs in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

"The president enjoys higher numbers than both (Ronald) Reagan and (Bill) Clinton at similar points in their presidencies," said Robert Fannin, chairman of the Arizona Republican Party. "It's not like the sky is falling. It's just a normal thing that happens and has happened in the last 25 years."

But Merrill said nearly one of every five Republicans looking for someone else is a bad sign for the president.

"It appears to me that the only thing that is propping him up at this point is the war on terrorism," Merrill said. "I think you will see him spin that with everything he does, trying to justify the war in Iraq and probably jobs and everything else, based on 9/11. It's in his political interest to do so."

Merrill and Democratic leaders said the situation is eerily similar to Bush's father in 1992, who lost his re-election bid after also waging a successful military campaign against Iraq's Saddam Hussein. Unlike the elder Bush, the president must deal with charges that he misled the world on the justification for war.

"The kind of problems that President Bush brought on himself aren't going to be solved overnight," said Jim Pederson, chairman of the Arizona Democratic Party.

Pederson spoke by phone Thursday from New York City, where he watched a debate between the 10 Democratic presidential candidates. Several polls this week show Bush's support dropping across the country, he said.

"It's just a reflection of the tremendous frustration that American people feel with this president," Pederson said. "The economy is in a wreck right now. Unemployment is going through the roof. The tax cut was ill-conceived."

Fannin pointed out the ASU poll didn't match Bush with any of the Democrat contenders, so those surveyed weren't asked to compare the president with a specific alternative.

Tom Liddy, chairman of the Maricopa County Republican Committee, said the only troubling question deals with the economy, which was a key reason for the 1992 defeat of Bush's father. There is evidence the economy is expanding again after more than two years of stagnation, he said.

"The president is going to have to rally the American people to agree with him on the economy," Liddy said. "If we get growth in the gross domestic product of 3.5 percent to 4 percent, that would turn around pretty quickly."

Liddy also said Arizona voters were more supportive in the survey of spending the $87 billion than voters nationwide as reflected in other polls.

The Arizona poll was sponsored by ASU's KAET-TV (Channel 8) and Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication. The survey included 390 registered voters with party identifications similar to statewide registration numbers. The margin of error was 5 percentage points.

Contact Le Templar by email, or phone (602) 542-5813


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: bush; polls; reelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2003 11:58:03 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpseal; A. Pole
I did a search and surprisingly I didn't see this.

I think this story says quite a bit. 1. Arizona is still a pretty conservative state. Though, we get less so on a daily basis. And 2., I dont think we have been hit quite as hard as many states have, concerning the now supposeed ending recession and current job losses.

2 posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:48 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri
The Arizona poll was sponsored by ASU's KAET-TV (Channel 8) and Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.

Not good news and probably not accurate, since anything with the name "Cronkite" attached to it has a leftist agenda.

3 posted on 09/26/2003 12:01:37 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
That's a very strange poll. You kinda have to read it twice.
4 posted on 09/26/2003 12:05:28 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riri
It's such an ASTONISHING COINCIDENCE that every pollster seems to be reporting flagging support for the President at this precise point in time -- just a few days after the polling data that showed even registered Democrats were at a loss to name which Democrats were running for President. I'm thinking a few markers are being called in.
5 posted on 09/26/2003 12:08:30 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri
We're all suckers for polls, but it's better to just kick back and relax. Today's polls are just as meaningful as the ones that showed Bush with a 90 percent approval: they're worthless.

The popular vote is going to shake out to be close, regardless. As '00 illustrated, it's the EC that counts.

6 posted on 09/26/2003 12:08:38 PM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
They admitted it was done on a weekend.
7 posted on 09/26/2003 12:10:10 PM PDT by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: riri
The polls are returning to normal levels.

All signs are pointing to '04 as being another 50/50 type election.

8 posted on 09/26/2003 12:10:32 PM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri; KC_Conspirator; Sacajaweau
Only 18 percent of Republicans said they would vote for someone else. But 72 percent of Democrats and 49 percent of independents said they didn't want Bush to have a second term.

Okay. So according to this poll 82% of Pubbies, 51% of indies, and 28% of Dems can reasonably expect to vote for President Bush at this stage. The AZ SecState shows voter registration as of Jul 03 to be:

GOP - 916.2K
Dem - 782.4K
Lib - 14.9K
Oth - 499K

Based on these numbers, and assuming equal turnout among all groups, Bush could be expected to pull 82% of 916K (751K) plus 28% of 782K (219K) plus 51% of 514K (262K) for a total of 1,232K votes if all those polled actually voted.

Over 1.23 million presumed votes in a state with a total registration of 2.21 million votes. In 2000 Bush beat Gore and Nader's combined total by about 50K votes (781K to 730K). I don't really see where this poll shows trouble for President Bush.

9 posted on 09/26/2003 12:25:10 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool; Mr. Bird; LarryM; comebacknewt
Don't know if you saw this thread yesterday, but it kinds of provides a historical perspective.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/989167/posts

10 posted on 09/26/2003 12:29:58 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
To be more precise in Post #9, 781.6K votes out of 1,532K votes cast in AZ in 2000 = 51%. The presumed numbers of 1.23 mil out of 2.21 mil = 56%.

Editorials passed off as news, in my book.

11 posted on 09/26/2003 12:33:31 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: riri
Sometimes I think all of this constant poll taking adds to the drag-down of his numbers. When the easily influenced sheeple hear enough bad news polls, their mindset changes.
12 posted on 09/26/2003 12:36:01 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Hmmmm. Even more interesting. According to the Green Party website, voter registration for AZ in 2000 looked like this:

GOP - 942K
Dem - 831K
Lib - 12.6K
Oth - 387K

So the Libs and indies have increased slightly. The GOP has lost 26K registered voters, while the Dems have lost nearly 50K voters - declining at a 2:1 ratio.

Tell me again how this poll shows him in trouble? :-)

13 posted on 09/26/2003 12:40:35 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coop
That is very good analysis and makes the point clear that this poll is not very accurate.
14 posted on 09/26/2003 12:41:19 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: riri
I'm not surprised by this “poll”. George W. lost the popular vote to a moron with gender issues. The job outlook has not improved and there seems to be no evidence of WMD's in Iraq.

The only thing encouraging about this “poll” is that Forty-four percent said they would prefer someone else. That “someone else” hasn't entered the race as of yet. If things don't get better soon... she might.

15 posted on 09/26/2003 12:41:55 PM PDT by johnny7 (“SHE'S NOT GONNA RUN FOR SENATOR!” -Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
That “someone else” hasn't entered the race as of yet. If things don't get better soon... she might.

She doesn't worry me in the red states.

16 posted on 09/26/2003 12:52:30 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
But they'll all be Red states if she wins, as in Communist!
17 posted on 09/26/2003 1:02:21 PM PDT by Galtoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: riri
I'll actually vote for him this time around.
18 posted on 09/26/2003 1:05:40 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
LOL
19 posted on 09/26/2003 1:05:52 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: riri
Though the economy and job losses most certainly have something to do with Bush's declining support in AZ (and many other states) what is being lost on most here is that AZ is transitioning into a Democratic state because of illegal immigration. It's no different in that regard than CA except it is a few years behind.

Apparently many have forgotten that up until the mid-90s AZ was one of the most reliable states for the GOP across the board. Now, AZ has a democratic governor and Bush barely won the state in 2000.

Demographics is destiny and the trends driven by illegal immigration certainly do not bode well for the Republican Party--especially conservatism in AZ or in any other state that is experiencing a mass influx of Illegal Aliens.

When is the Stupid Party going to Wake Up?

20 posted on 09/26/2003 1:12:39 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson