Ugh! i hope this gets straightened out. this is bad news.
1 posted on
09/24/2003 8:51:49 AM PDT by
rattrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: rattrap
The FTC had signed up some 50 million phone numbers for the list, which was due to take effect on Oct. 1. And given the list to the Telemarketers Association.
Now they have 50 million verified names and phone numbers. What a great scam!!
2 posted on
09/24/2003 8:55:17 AM PDT by
balrog666
(As long as people believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities.)
To: rattrap
Joining the list is strictly voluntary. That should count for something.
To: rattrap
I guess Americans need to take a more pro-active stance when they receive phone calls that they obviously don't want.
Perhaps a "national reply" is needed so these companies will take numbers off their lists voluntarily rather than to hire people to listen to the same comment over and over again before they are hung up on.
4 posted on
09/24/2003 8:55:47 AM PDT by
The Brush
(u)
To: rattrap
"
The U.S. District Court in Oklahoma City said the Federal Trade Commission overstepped its authority when it set up the popular anti-telemarketing measure, according to the DMA.The FTC had signed up some 50 million phone numbers for the list, which was due to take effect on Oct. 1."
One court against 50 million. It's time to take the court to task....
6 posted on
09/24/2003 8:56:16 AM PDT by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: rattrap
A U.S. court in Oklahoma has blocked the national "do not call" list that would allow consumers to stop most unwanted telephone sales calls, the Direct Marketing Association said on Wednesday. Oklahoma??
Oklahoma?
I thought only California had weirdo federal courts. What's going on?
7 posted on
09/24/2003 8:57:27 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: rattrap
Perhaps those of us with free long distance can exercise our First Amendment rights and let the court know how we feel by calling them at (405)609-5000. Be sure and call frequently, preferably at mealtimes when they are short-handed.
To: rattrap
This will give our congressmen and senators a very popular bill to send through......and go around taking credit for, ad nauseum.
9 posted on
09/24/2003 8:58:15 AM PDT by
capt. norm
(You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.)
To: rattrap
What does the court think about blasting heavy metal music into the phone when 'unavailable' shows up in caller ID?
To: rattrap
Oh well!
Time to get the bullhorn out again! It helps to get my point across.
To: rattrap
This bites the big one....
This dang calling till 9PM and during the day & even on Sat irks the heck outta me
It is like having door to door salesmen showing up at your house day after day right at supper time ringing the door bell till either you or the answering machine picks up....and this even after ya told the sob not to come to your house anymore...someone needs to invent a digital pit bull to sic on these poopie heads
Heaven help you if you are expecting an important call from a loved one...a sick relative...the hospital etc...you are obliged to "pick up" and there they are...
And of course a black robed jack booted thug wannabe is there to force it on you..
15 posted on
09/24/2003 9:02:34 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: rattrap
Would these idiots be kin to the 9th circus court in Kalifornia by chance?
18 posted on
09/24/2003 9:03:46 AM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(I am ashamed the dixie chicks are from Texas!)
To: rattrap
What the court has blicked is essentially an anti-trespassing measure that applied to phone lines, thus depriving the American people of private property rights and control over their own lives.
19 posted on
09/24/2003 9:05:56 AM PDT by
RLK
To: rattrap
Judges seem to exert their authority of the public.......50 million sign -ups? The judges are running this country, the heck waht voters say or want...time for another revolution?
22 posted on
09/24/2003 9:15:19 AM PDT by
Burlem
To: rattrap
23 posted on
09/24/2003 9:15:34 AM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: rattrap
Nah - just answer every temarketing call rudely, while using bad language and a threatening tone. At some point, they'll have to pay their employees too much to take the abuse.
25 posted on
09/24/2003 9:17:40 AM PDT by
Chancellor Palpatine
(All eyes were on Ford Prefect. Some of them were on stalks.)
To: rattrap
I know I am going to get flammed for this comment, but here goes...
I don't have a problem with this ruling. I am not a telemarketer, but I am perfectly capable of hanging up on telemarketers, or letting the answering machine get it. Just as I am capable of deleting and blocking spam messeges. This is not tresspassing. I am just as oppossed to smoking bans, abusive use of emminent domain, etc...
26 posted on
09/24/2003 9:18:07 AM PDT by
ibheath
(Born-again and grateful to God for it.)
To: rattrap
Ok, the FTC overstepped its authority. How about how the courts overstep their authority every day and violate not only their oath of office but the very Constitution they have sworn to defend?
Oh, never mind; I forgot - the courts are GOD and no longer subject to the Constitution!
Mark A Sity
28 posted on
09/24/2003 9:24:25 AM PDT by
logic101.net
(http://www.logic101.net/)
To: rattrap
This IS bad news. But I signed up with my telephone company to have Caller Rejection. Most telemarketers have blocked numbers. My phone no longer rings for these blocked numbers. Unless they agree to show their name and number.
I am SO thankful I found this feature. It's excellent.
31 posted on
09/24/2003 9:28:00 AM PDT by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: rattrap
Simple solution. Congress simply expands the authority of the FTC to do it.
32 posted on
09/24/2003 9:30:24 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: rattrap
Judges seem out of control these days...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson