Skip to comments.
Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?
AP via Lifesite.net ^
| Aug. 26, 03
| churchillbuff
Posted on 08/26/2003 2:23:28 PM PDT by churchillbuff
According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion
and gay adoption". England's May 30 Guardian newspaper also quotes commentator Bill Bradley stating, "He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights
"
IS THIS REALLY AN ISSUE THAT FREEPERS CAN SWEEP UNDER THE RUG? SHOULDN'T WE DEBATE IT - UNLIKE ABOTION IT'S SOMETHING THAT STATE POLITICIANS CAN REALLY HAVE AN EFFECT OVER. SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? IF YOU SAY NO, CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT ARNOLD?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamentebooster; desperatemcnaderite; family; homosexual; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; prisoners; recall; schwarzenegger; thispostisalie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301 next last
To: churchillbuff
Well... at the moment it looks like your only realistic options are "Gov. Schwarzenegger" or "Gov. Bustamante". Which one do you want?
61
posted on
08/26/2003 2:45:26 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: Grand Old Partisan
What you are doing is indistinguishable from what a Democrat operatitive would be doing on behalf of Cruz Bustamante.
I happen to think the issue of Gay Adoptions is important. I don't what the GOP to support Gay Adoptions. Why is it a crime to ask pro-Arnold freepers whether they agree with me or with Arnold on this fundamental issue that could have so much influence on our culture's future?
To: =Intervention=
Jeeez, I had to go back and read my statements. I didn't say they didn't matter, I said they outta dry up and blow away. I sorta agree with your assessment that law should reflect a moral order, I'm only rejecting the moral order of those religious folks who would force their belief upon us.
63
posted on
08/26/2003 2:45:43 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Grand Old Partisan
No room for diversity of thought here! GOP has spoken! Everyone fall in line!
64
posted on
08/26/2003 2:45:50 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: churchillbuff
Show me Arnold's exact words, not the quotes attributed to him by Lifesite.net and I'll let you know what I think.
Otherwise it's just hearsay speculation.
FACTS PLEASE!
65
posted on
08/26/2003 2:46:37 PM PDT
by
Weimdog
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: LisaAnne
I've noticed that, and a few other similies.
67
posted on
08/26/2003 2:46:53 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: =Intervention=
Do you really think that you are going to change anyones vote by all the ranting and raving you do? Don't flatter yourself.
I will vote for whoever I think is best suited to dig us out of this financial mess we are in. I certainly are not going to take advice from anyone that has nothing to gain or lose in this election.
68
posted on
08/26/2003 2:47:47 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: Redcloak
Realism is determined by poll numbers from the LA Times, of course...or other polls of similar uhm veracity. Why are they correct now and not correct the rest of the year?
69
posted on
08/26/2003 2:47:49 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: =Intervention=
Sorry, I asked your gang to stop posting graphics and you guys refused and trashed me for it. Now, deal with it. Both sides can play that game. I tried to tell you that, now it's waaaaaaa time.
BTW, I don't trash McClintock on his policy. I agree with his platform. Please explain what motive I have for defending Schwarzenegger on this forum, other than to keep a viable fall back position alive?
Are you keeping an alternative position alive? No. You're seeking to eliminate one.
To: Weimdog
And you, sir or madam, kindly show a little respect towards other candidates.
If you are going to refer to one candidate by the first name only, refer to the others such as McClintock, as "Tom".
71
posted on
08/26/2003 2:48:39 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
To: =Intervention=
In post #45 he said 'McCormick".
72
posted on
08/26/2003 2:48:45 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: =Intervention=
"Everyone fall in line!"
I agree. Unite behind the front-runner, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and defeat Cruz Bustamante.
73
posted on
08/26/2003 2:49:52 PM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: LisaAnne
Of course. Valid opinion or insight can only come from people whose lives are directly affected, and not from anyone else. That's completely illogical, but you said it and not I.
74
posted on
08/26/2003 2:50:08 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: B Knotts
Please explain to the forum participants what happens on October 7th, if McClintock's pulling 10-15%, and Schwarzenegger's chances have been destroyed. I'd like to hear that logic. Bustamanted could never benefit from this right? LOL
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: xzins
It appears that sane parents must now put instructions in their wills about what kind of person(s) will ever be able to adopt their children should something happen to the parents. With all due respect, sane parents have ALWAYS put it in their will who will get custody of their children in case of parental death.
To: =Intervention=
No, but it's sure easier for those who have nothing to lose to tell everyone else what to do. Liberals do it all the time.
78
posted on
08/26/2003 2:51:06 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: 68 grunt; DittoJed2; goodseedhomeschool (returned); Dataman; conservababeJen; gore3000; AndrewC
Social conservatives outta dry up and blow away. Time to evolve! Don't know if you are serious or joking ?
79
posted on
08/26/2003 2:51:27 PM PDT
by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: DoughtyOne
Don't stop with your graphics, Ron, you're doing superbly! I am most proud of your patient effort! You're also real effective at bringin' 'em outta the woodwork.
80
posted on
08/26/2003 2:51:48 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson