To: =Intervention=
Sorry, I asked your gang to stop posting graphics and you guys refused and trashed me for it. Now, deal with it. Both sides can play that game. I tried to tell you that, now it's waaaaaaa time.
BTW, I don't trash McClintock on his policy. I agree with his platform. Please explain what motive I have for defending Schwarzenegger on this forum, other than to keep a viable fall back position alive?
Are you keeping an alternative position alive? No. You're seeking to eliminate one.
To: DoughtyOne
Don't stop with your graphics, Ron, you're doing superbly! I am most proud of your patient effort! You're also real effective at bringin' 'em outta the woodwork.
80 posted on
08/26/2003 2:51:48 PM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: DoughtyOne
" guys refused and trashed me for it."
I haven't posted a single graphic, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. (Check my posts if you like.)
BTW, the "you guys" comment is also a bit off. I've had precisely one comment on "strategy" as it were from a Pro-McClintock guy. And that was telling me to not waste my time debating with the other side. *LOL* So...it's not an organized thing, sorry about that.
I haven't said anything about Schwartz as a fallback position, but since you asked, I think that he's fine as a fallback. I've also stated support for a "withdraw by a certain date if your numbers aren't X" too.
So even though I've never been asked this question, I would support him as a fallback.
87 posted on
08/26/2003 2:53:59 PM PDT by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson