Dude. Lay off the crack.
Posted on 08/24/2003 3:58:57 AM PDT by JustPiper
COMING TO AMERICA
$7.4 billion expense hurting American kids, group says
An immigration reform group says in a new study it costs states more than $7.4 billion a year to educate illegal aliens, with budget-busted California spending more than any other.
Worse, warns the Federation for American Immigration Reform report, the extra expenditures are taking funds away from American children at a time when "public schools throughout the country are facing some of the most significant decreases in state education funding in decades."
Many Mexican children cross into U.S. from Mexico daily to go to school. (Jon Dougherty/WND photo)
"With state budgets in crisis and children taking the hit, communities' limited tax dollars are being diverted to accommodate mass illegal immigration," said the report. "In some states, the amount of money spent to educate illegal alien children accounts for a substantial portion of the state budget shortfall; in New Jersey, for instance, it accounts for 28 percent of the total state budget deficit."
FAIR says almost two-thirds of states either have cut back or proposed reductions in their child care and early childhood programs.
"In some states, drastic cuts mean lay-offs for teachers, larger class sizes, fewer textbooks, and eliminating sports, language programs and after-school activities," the report noted.
The total cost, FAIR says, is "enough to buy a computer for every junior high student nationwide."
Other immigration reformists have said the cost of providing education and other public services to illegals has steadily been on the rise.
Adding to those costs, says Jim Boulet, Jr., head of English First, a group pushing English as the nation's official language, are translation costs to schools that must hire interpreters for Spanish-only immigrant students.
Plus, Boulet told WorldNetDaily, "Cuban Spanish, Puerto Rican Spanish, Chicano Spanish, and additional forms of Spanish all exist within the borders of the U.S., creating vast potential for cross-cultural confusion" and, of course, extra expense, despite "California being an official English state."
According to the FAIR report, California spends the most – $2.2 billion – to educate illegal immigrant children. Ranking second and third, respectively, are Texas and New York.
FAIR analysts said each state's per-pupil expenditure was reported by the U.S. Department of Education. The group said it based its figures on the Urban Institute's estimate of 1.1 million school-aged illegal immigrant children currently residing in the U.S.
The report also says there are efforts underway in several states and Congress to allow illegal aliens to pay deeply discounted, in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities – rates not available to American citizens from out of state.
"As states cut school funding left and right, all of our children – native-born and immigrants alike – are receiving a poorer education as a result of the federal government passing its immigration law enforcement failures on to the states," the report concluded. "The implications for the coming generations of workers, our future economy and our long-term competitiveness in the world cannot be ignored."
Supporters of immigration say the cost to educate immigrant children – legal or otherwise – is a non-issue.
"Regardless of what the dollar figure is, these children have a right to an education," Jim Ferg-Cadima, legislative staff lawyer at the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, told The Washington Times. "The issue was litigated all the way to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court decided on the issue."
In the high court's 1982 decision, Plyler v. Doe, justices said in a 5-4 decision the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment forbade public schools from prohibiting any children, regardless of citizenship status, an education.
Other supporters say the cost of educating illegals is minimal compared to the overall $700 billion annual cost of public education. And, they say it is the nation's best interests to educate illegal alien children rather than ignore them.
Still, the costs are continuing to rise and they come at a time when more Americans have become fed up with providing benefits to illegal immigrants.
An Aug. 30, 2001, Harris Interactive poll found 60 percent of Americans opposed a new plan to grant illegals amnesty.
"By decisive margins, the American public believes that illegal immigration is a net drain on public resources and that granting amnesty to illegal immigrants will encourage even more people to migrate illegally," the survey said.
A RoperASW poll in March found three in four Americans would reduce the number of immigrants allowed into the country annually. Fifty-eight percent would limit legal immigration to 300,000 a year, and 85 percent viewed illegal immigration as a "serious" problem.
"Illegal immigration is no free lunch," Dan Stein, executive director of FAIR, told the Times. "It's about shifting burdens – lowering labor costs at a tremendous cost not only to American taxpayers but to American kids."
Mark Krikorian, head of the Center for Immigration Studies, said U.S. and state governments could reduce costs by enforcing laws on the books.
"The solution is to start enforcing the law – not just at the border, which is politically easy, but also inside the country," he told WorldNetDaily.
Added FAIR spokesman David Ray: "If illegal immigration is not stopped at the border, its negative consequences, including bankrupt emergency rooms and overcrowded schools, quickly become everyone's financial burden."
Try harvesting strawberries with machinery.
I don't know about potatos, but I can tell you that if you drive between Santa Cruz and Monterey, CA, every day you will see people out working the fields. Most of them are probably illegal immigrants.
Would you want to do that job? Would your kids?
Maybe so. I know I would not and mine would not.
Again: These are not bad people. They work hard. They have come here to try to improve their lives. Same way we did.
The problems are in the way we deal with them. We could do much better than we do. We keep them as an under-class. This is basically a Democratic party policy. They want to keep them poor and dependant. I do not.
You want to throw them out. But they contribute quite a lot to our country. To the extent that they consume a disproportionate amount of social resourses, that can be fixed. Most of it.
There is no need to go bashing. They don't deserve it.
I took the juniper to the dump. Yes, I saved money.
You think I was going to hire a contractor and pay $500 to get that juniper removed? It would still be there.
As it was, some money got spread around. Not much, but some. It didn't hurt the ecomony. It didn't hurt anyone. And the juniper got removed.
I planted a very nice fern in its place.
They have come here to try to improve their lives. Same way we did.
No, they didn't come here the same way we did. They crossed the border illegally and obtained employment illegally. My ancestors arrived from the UK on the Mayflower and also at the establishment of Jamestown. My paternal great grandfather emigrated from Wales in 1863 and arrived via Ellis Island.
I have many friends from Wales that are now U.S. citizens. They had to wait in a lottery process from 3 to 7 years before being permitted to emigrate to the U.S. They were required to have a financially stable U.S. citizen sponsor them and assist them through the naturalization process. The illegal Mexican don't follow the process. They jump the border, obtain illegal employment and often arrange access to our welfare systems by creating an "instant citizen" care of the 14th amendment.
Dude. Lay off the crack.
You talking to me? If so, you should learn to read more carefully before spouting off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.