Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama SC justices cave, order Ten Commandments removed
AP on Fox News ^ | 8-21-03 | AP on Fox News website

Posted on 08/21/2003 8:33:17 AM PDT by rwfromkansas

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

MONTGOMERY, Ala.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 10commandments; 1stamendment; 666; allyourcommandments; antichrist; antichristian; arebelongtous; bigotry; firstamendment; freedomofreligion; monument; moore; religiousfreedom; roymoore; tencommandements; tencommandments; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,201-1,220 next last
To: Impeach the Boy
Most of the REST of the court is made up of DEMOCRATS

Actually, according to the A.P., "seven of the eight associate justices also are Republicans."

101 posted on 08/21/2003 9:18:51 AM PDT by libravoter (Live from the People's Republic of Cambridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
"They don't care about civil liberties of ALL Americans, just some of them."

What subset do you have in mind?
102 posted on 08/21/2003 9:18:56 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I'm a heterosexual Catholic...

I take it, this means you are not a priest...

103 posted on 08/21/2003 9:19:21 AM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: inquest
You seem quite good at not letting facts interfere with the caricatures they throw your way.

my impression comes not from the media, but from hearing moore himself speak on the matter.

104 posted on 08/21/2003 9:19:26 AM PDT by jethropalerobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Griswold v. Connecticut was wrongly decided in my view. This is the decision that brought the commercial 'right of privacy' (invented in a 1893 Harvard Law Review article) which was intended to deal with the right to one's own name and image, into Consititutional and criminal law. Howevermuch the result, invalidating the CT law, was not bad, the way it was done was the direct precursor, and the precedent relied upon, in Roe v. Wade.
105 posted on 08/21/2003 9:19:34 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Won't happen. We live in a nation of cowards who fear govt'.
106 posted on 08/21/2003 9:19:41 AM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Calm down. You look ridiculous.

Am I wrong? Does your version of the Constitution have the 10th Amendment torn out?

107 posted on 08/21/2003 9:19:57 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
My plan is to depart and live in a third world country and be left alone. I have two years remaining on my five year plan...main goal is to be financially secure prior to departing.
108 posted on 08/21/2003 9:20:25 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: montag813
the Founding Fathers subverted the rule of law and should have been jailed.

What do you think God would say should be the punishment for someone who enslaves another because of their race?

109 posted on 08/21/2003 9:20:34 AM PDT by HurkinMcGurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
I heard that the people that are part of the ACLU are the ones that got beat up in school, the ones that Mommy and daddy did not give enough attention to, and the ones that could not keep a pet because they ran away!

What do they do when they retire from the ACLU anyways.
110 posted on 08/21/2003 9:21:17 AM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: xrp
What's Next will the ACLU now say we have to burn all the churches down as well?

Last time I checked, churches were not a branch of the US government. The judicial system is.

Last time I checked, neither were public schools, but it didn't stop them there.

111 posted on 08/21/2003 9:21:19 AM PDT by m1-lightning (What's the difference between Nazis and Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
As Emerson put it:

... A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, much beloved of small statesmen and divines....

From Self-Reliance

112 posted on 08/21/2003 9:21:39 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
live on TV too, and Almighty God strikes them all down. hehe, now that's reality TV.
113 posted on 08/21/2003 9:21:48 AM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Ok, fine. Then I assume the case will be appealed to a higher court to attempt to overturn the ruling.
114 posted on 08/21/2003 9:21:54 AM PDT by Mr Crontab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Don't go unless you can still Freep from there.
115 posted on 08/21/2003 9:22:14 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Ok. You win. The ACLU is concerned only with the rights of individuals. They have no agenda. They care only for the Constitution. They passionately serve the law and have no bias whatsoever. They are beyond reproach. The Constitution AND our Republic would be doomed without the ACLU. We would be in a North American equivelent of Hitler's Germany, or Stalin's Russia, or Pol Pot's Cambodia if the ACLU did not ram their view of a "living constitution" down our throats.

The ACLU has NEVER argued a case that could in any way be interpreted as anything but upholding the Constitution and the rights of citizens to be free of government interference. They remain seated upon a cloud of impartiality.

Happy now?

116 posted on 08/21/2003 9:22:20 AM PDT by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: jethropalerobber
I've heard (or I should say read) him speak on the matter, too, and he has always stated - correctly - that his actions are in accord with the Constitution, and that his oath to the Constitution must be honored. That, of course, doesn't stop others from mischaracterizing him as saying that his notion of "God's law" supercedes the Constitution.
117 posted on 08/21/2003 9:22:43 AM PDT by inquest (We are NOT the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Does your version of the Constitution have the 10th Amendment torn out?

No. Does yours have the 14th torn out?

118 posted on 08/21/2003 9:23:18 AM PDT by sinkspur (Get two dogs and be part of a pack!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You predicted this accurately yesterday . Common sense prevailed.

To: Selmo

The associate justices have indicated they may take action later.

The associate justices will vote 8-0 to remove the monument, and Bill Pryor, the AG, will remove it.

13 posted on 08/20/2003 7:14 PM PDT by sinkspur (Get two dogs and be part of a pack!)


119 posted on 08/21/2003 9:23:34 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
An Old Cherokee describes an experience going on
inside himself....
"It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves.
One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret,
greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment,
inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.

The other is good - he is joy, peace, love, hope,
serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy,
generosity, truth, compassion, and faith. This same
fight is going on inside you - and inside every
other person, too."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then
asked his grandfather, "Which wolf will win?"

The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed."


Stay Safe !
120 posted on 08/21/2003 9:23:45 AM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,201-1,220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson