Skip to comments.
Buffett Recruited as Schwarzenegger's Economic Adviser
Bloomberg no url
| 8/13/3
Posted on 08/13/2003 11:57:30 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker
Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) --Arnold Schwarzenegger, the actor who is running for governor of California, said billionaire investor Warren Buffett will be the financial and economic adviser to his political campaign, the campaign said in a statement.
Buffett, the world's second-richest man, has built a fortune buy buying companies through his company, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Debbie Bosanek, Buffett's assistant, didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1eternalvignotincali; arnold; california; iwantsimon; mcclinton; mcloser; mcmarginalized; nativenewyorkeridiot; schwarzenegger; schwarzenrino; simonsezvote4me; tedschwarzenkennedy; terminatedavis; tommcvictory; tomwho; warrenbuffett; whoreacleofomaha
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 281-293 next last
To: HamiltonJay
I would compare Buffett to the industrialists of WWII Germany...getting rich by means of capitalism, but utterly owned by the socialists and their ideology.
To: Austin Willard Wright
Interestingly, Buffett's father, Howard Buffett, was a very conservative congressman from Nebraska, sort of the Ron Paul of the 1950s. Warren, however, tends to depict his father as a poor fool who was mislead by the rightwingers. I always wondered how Warren was so connected to the rich and powerful at such an early age. Most of his wealth came from favors from those connections. Not all of it, and he certainly made the most of it. People should know that most of his wealth doesn't come from shrewd investing, but cleverly avoiding taxes and as I said, those insider connections into government and business.
To: Austin Willard Wright
LOL, I never liked Bloomberg either. I think Buffet is a joke but he is savy. He's not going to be in the administration, he's going to be forming economic policy for the campaign.
The BIGGEST problem facing California is their sinking bond ratings, and face it, they're going to have to get that straightened out so they don't have to raise taxes. Raising taxes in California would spell disaster and even Buffet has to know that. However, his experience in the bond market will prove invaluable for California.
Now, if he moves into the statehouse after the election, I might just have a problem with it, but I don't expect Buffet would be willing to waste the time.
To: B Knotts
Notice he waited until the end of Rush's show to announce this. :-)This is the worst news I could possibly imagine. Subtle, easy to forget, alot of people don't know who this elitist marxist is, but more telling than any detailed speech this Bloomberg-with-muscles could possibly make.
So long economic recovery. I was totally second guessing my criticism of Arnuld, but this changes everything.
124
posted on
08/13/2003 12:56:57 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Governor McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: B Knotts
Who am I going to put more weight behind on public tax Policy? Warren Buffet whos actually created wealth, or Steve Forbes who inherited it?
I don't agree with higher taxes, but I also don't agree that every tax cut ever invented is always the best course of public policy at the time they are proposed. I know that spits in the face of Republican dogma, but the belief that tax cuts ALWAYS improve the situation is not reality, but ideology.
Sorry, who would you trust the economy of California to? Warren Buffet or Steve Forbes? I don't know about you, but I'll take buffet hands down on that one.
To: Moonman62
Actually, I don't think his father was unusually wealthy or had particularly good connections. His father was a principled Ron Paul type unlike his son who is the ultimate "pragmatic" insider.
To: TexasNative2000
Oh....... Warren, not Jimmy. Yeah, I was afraid we'd get our surplus back again and spend it all on tequila.
127
posted on
08/13/2003 12:57:36 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: Austin Willard Wright
You seem to be pursuing a completely different topic than my posts that you keep responding to. A wierd way to have a conversation.
To: Diddle E. Squat
Huh? What do you mean? I merely pointed out that so called "financial geniuses" (Bloomberg was used as an example) are often thorough statists when they get power.
To: McGavin999
I tend to agree. Time is short and the state needs to be shaken up. California either sinks or swims with someone outside the political mainstream. While Arnold isn't everything to everyone, I'm hoping he's hard nosed enough to kick some ass. Just because he has this media image doesn't mean he can deliver the same once he is Governer.
- Mark
To: EternalVigilance
I would compare Buffett to the industrialists of WWII Germany...getting rich by means of capitalism, but utterly owned by the socialists and their ideology.A good definition of fascism. The didn't call it national socialism for no reason.
131
posted on
08/13/2003 12:59:49 PM PDT
by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: HamiltonJay
AT LEST ARNIE HAS A PLAN,DOOFUS HAS NOTHING!!!!
132
posted on
08/13/2003 12:59:54 PM PDT
by
jocko12
To: B Knotts
Several. Buffett, Bill Gates, Soros...just to name a few. Beg to differ. They are capitalists with all that money.
To: jocko12
First off, does Arnie have a plan? Plus don't underestimate Doofus.
To: Miss Marple
But Buffett is a democrat, and I do not trust him. I don't either, but it could be Arnold cosmetically padding his resume. Who knows. Buffet is a darling of Wall Street and does bring some cache within the Wall Street circles.
Does anybody know if Steve Forbes has politically condemned Warren Buffet?
135
posted on
08/13/2003 1:02:02 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: Protagoras; onyx
but I admire his monetary genius! Never confuse brains with a bull market.
Ouch. Quote of the day by Protagoras. This appointment is the worst thing Arnuld "dont caw me me-ayor Bloomberg" could have possibly conceived of.
McClintock in 03.
136
posted on
08/13/2003 1:03:17 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Governor McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: Miss Marple
Although I favor Tom McClintock, all signs were pointing to the imminent election of Schwarzenegger, and I was truly, honestly holding out some hope that his viewings of "Free to Choose" would kick it, and he would take on the state budget with a cleaver.
Sadly, I have pretty much lost any hope of that today.
Buffett is indeed a DemocRAT, and a rather nasty one at that.
To: NativeNewYorker
And in other news, Governor Greyout Davis has named Alan Greenspan as his new economic advisor.
138
posted on
08/13/2003 1:03:19 PM PDT
by
Beck_isright
(Shenandoah and Blue Ridge will re-emerge as the investment of the 21st Century....)
To: NativeNewYorker
Very bad choice....if he recruits Buffett's evil twin Soros next, I'm going to barf.
How to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Buffett loathes Republicans.
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Actually CNBC is on at my Office right now, and this getting A LOT of coverage and attention!
I think (And hope) this will be widely noticed by the media.
140
posted on
08/13/2003 1:03:58 PM PDT
by
Pubbie
(Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 281-293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson