Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USA Today/CNN/Gallup Polls Results (GWB back at 60% job approval)
USA Today ^ | August 7, 2003 | USA Today

Posted on 08/07/2003 7:25:55 PM PDT by DrDeb

Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:02 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]


(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: approvalratings; gallup; polls; presidentbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: SuziQ
That's a great point! The dem convention is ..?? I think their primary is in March ..??
81 posted on 08/07/2003 10:46:16 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
It is tricky...I wish they would change the format.

I am sure I have made the same mistake before...lol.
82 posted on 08/07/2003 10:48:54 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Ouch.

I am anti-libertarian, but you ripped 'em good.

Keep it up.
83 posted on 08/07/2003 10:53:59 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thanks for the DOSE ping for those of us suffering August Withdrawals!
84 posted on 08/07/2003 11:14:13 PM PDT by lorrainer (Oh, was I ranting? Sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Check your source. The numbers to which you refer were TWO YEARS AGO!
85 posted on 08/07/2003 11:35:30 PM PDT by jimkress (Go away Pat Go away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
The second date, that of 8/i refers to AUGUST 2001 ; not August 1,2003.

Nice attempt at a smear, but you're dead wrong, in total error, and really need to learn how to read a chart/poll. ;^)

86 posted on 08/07/2003 11:40:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb; ohioWfan
Another thing---I have done polling and analysis before and you can always count on the undecided voters to be split with a slight advantage toward the incumbent, so that would add another 4 to 5 points to President Bush in these polls--which would automatically put him well above the 50% mark.
87 posted on 08/08/2003 12:00:07 AM PDT by GOP-Pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
I'm surprised you asked. The source is one you yourself cite! See the FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll: In fact, it's the very first statistic reported. How could you have possibly missed it? Maybe FOX News keeps these numbers off the air because they want to spin things for Bush? I don't know; I don't have a TV.

I'm surprised you can't read better. It didn't give your numbers at all. You are obviously looking at August 2001 rather than the latest poll.

88 posted on 08/08/2003 12:10:26 AM PDT by GOP-Pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: justshe; DrDeb
Nice analysis, Dr. Deb!

Thanks for the ping, justshe!
89 posted on 08/08/2003 3:29:43 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Excellent news DrDeb! I agree with your assessment of the Pew polling, they always poll the President low. By the way back in 1995 at this time Clinton was polling at 46% approval ratings and CNN actually said that wasn't bad! Can you imagine if Bush was polling at 46%!!
90 posted on 08/08/2003 4:23:51 AM PDT by ReaganRevolution (Don't believe the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
My local ABC affiliate must have inadvertently [wink] forgotten to mention this little tidbit on this morning's newscast. Go figure!
91 posted on 08/08/2003 4:46:10 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Pore ole albore........

What next in their psyhco desperation?

These polls must be sooo disappointing.

92 posted on 08/08/2003 5:40:05 AM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble
loonie leftwing wingnut!

Excuse me?! I'm forever in the debt of your son, his comrades and in fact penpal regularly with a USMC corporal in Iraq. Whatever your issues with polls and ratings are, I was making a positive comment about the Pres. current number and hoping to see events as I listed take them higher. In no way did I bash the military or any other entity except perhaps the media. Your comment to me was way out of line. Perhaps your agenda is too. Prairie

93 posted on 08/08/2003 7:06:09 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Middle East terrorists to the world: " We don't want no STINKING PEACE!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"In other words, these polls seem to suggest that a certain portion of the population will vote Dem no matter who is batting against Bush..."

There is always that pesky 35%. The Kool Aid drinkers, Rats 'till the end...

94 posted on 08/08/2003 7:13:45 AM PDT by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
truth bump :o)
95 posted on 08/08/2003 8:07:20 AM PDT by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
To clarify:

I was making a broad statement and used the "you understood" as in..."You can never tell". I, in no way, meant that you, prairie, were a loonie LWN. Sorry to have been so sloppy!

96 posted on 08/08/2003 8:10:00 AM PDT by ishabibble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: swheats; Miss Marple
First of all there was never any free fall inspite of every left wing mediot in America and the world trying to electronically lynch President Bush.

Their polling data shows that this:

2003 Aug 04-06 60 36 4

2003 Jul 25-27 58 38 4

2003 Jul 18-20 59 38 3

2003 Jul 07-09 62 34 4

2003 Jun 27-29 61 36 3

2003 Jun 12-15 63 33 4

2003 Jun 09-10 62 34 4


These professional hate GWers were able to swing 2% of the moderates with their total Yellowcake Scam media war. Now even that two % is coming back.

Morris is still a Clintoonian suckler and not to be trusted.

97 posted on 08/08/2003 8:20:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end," said Uday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Daschle deeply saddened...
98 posted on 08/08/2003 8:22:58 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Thanks for the ping
99 posted on 08/08/2003 9:13:48 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Can you imagine the poll numbers if the press didn't lie awake nights dreaming up lies and attacks? gutter rats with typewriters...
100 posted on 08/08/2003 9:42:12 AM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson