Skip to comments.
WE'LL KO KOBE: DA
NY Post ^
| August 6, 2003
| DOUGLAS MONTERO, BARRY BORTNICK and DAN MANGAN
Posted on 08/06/2003 8:40:57 AM PDT by ellery
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:15:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The prosecutor in the Kobe Bryant rape case says he has slam-dunk evidence to prove the NBA superstar's guilt, it was revealed on the eve of the hoopster's first court appearance today. Eagle County District Attorney Mark Hurlbert made that strong claim in court papers arguing against making public the police affidavit written to justify Bryant's arrest early last month.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: betmymothershouse; bryant; dontbelieveaccuser; harpyalert; harpypotamus; harpytalkingpoints; herewegoagain; iamalwaysright; iknoweverything; iwasintheroom; kobe; kobebryant; kobekoven; kobelover; laughable; mycousinknowsclay; playtheback9; rape; tactfree; tactless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 521-534 next last
To: OPS4
This is a much less wide-ranging case, though -- as another poster said, it's not a whodunnit but rather "what happened." It seems to me at first blush at least that it was probably good that the DA took his time before charging Bryant (i.e., he didn't immediately jump to conclusions). Who knows, though...we really don't know much yet.
301
posted on
08/06/2003 2:30:09 PM PDT
by
ellery
To: Howlin
"Several sources familiar with the case also told ABCNEWS that the accuser has alleged that she tried to leave Bryant's hotel room and he blocked the door. The sources said that the sheriff's original arrest warrant included a misdemeanor claim of false imprisonment."
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Sports/kobebryant_hearing030806.html I doubt it would be in the original arrest warrant if she just came up with it today.
(I hope I'm not going against protocol by posting without being directly addressed.)
To: ellery
No, it becomes; are you following proper procedure, is the
prosecutors office leaking information, is the evidence
being blown out of proportion, and has the sheriffs office
broken procedure on more than one count?
Ops4 God bLess America!
303
posted on
08/06/2003 2:32:31 PM PDT
by
OPS4
To: cyncooper
not start criticizing people for things they never saidAre you contending that people haven't already said on these threads that Kobe and his attorneys are smearing the victim?
304
posted on
08/06/2003 2:32:38 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: redlipstick
That's an article from today; cyncooper said we all knew this; I asked for any article that gave the details we're hearing today.
305
posted on
08/06/2003 2:33:58 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: redlipstick
(I hope I'm not going against protocol by posting without being directly addressed.) Very cute. I have no problem with YOUR posts; it's the ones that don't make sense that bother me.
306
posted on
08/06/2003 2:34:40 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: PhiKapMom
If I were a judge in ANY case, I would gag the whole lot of attorneys on both sides! He did. Last week.
307
posted on
08/06/2003 2:36:24 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cyncooper
Absolutely correct-it has been reported -more than once-that Kobe's legal term is attempting to find dirt on the victim. Posters were not smearing Kobe, but posting information that was out there.
308
posted on
08/06/2003 2:36:32 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: Howlin
haven't you had the TV on; Knock off the tone with me, Howlin. .
I haven't been able to watch much tv today, but I heard the breathless reports on this topic as if it were "new news", when it really isn't.
This was part of the arrest from the beginning--the false imprisonment charge that the DA decided not to file, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out she was saying he wouldn't let her leave. In fact, that has been reported openly as part of the bellhop story all week.
I didn't claim to be positive of what actually happened, just what she CLAIMS happened. There is a huge difference
To: GraniteStateConservative
and Kobe has already admitted to adultery-- which isn't a crime Good thing you are not a lawyer.
310
posted on
08/06/2003 2:37:23 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Howlin
We get pulled into this slimey stuff because of the media; the media sucks -- and to justify their very existence, they sucker punch US with sensational headlines which turn out to be untrue, and then they lecture us on the morality of it all. If we learn nothing else from this little dog and pony show, we should never forget that the media and their "stringers" are bottom feeders that can make any one of us look as guilty as sin -- and get paid for doing it.
My big "thang" is actually hoping to actually SEE a trial, any trial, where everybod obeys the rules........LOL.
Well Howlin I agree with you on your above statments...I hate to see someone tried in the media..it is just like a mob screaming for blood or sharks on a feeding frenzy....like the OJ or Westerfield Trial, Like the Scott Woodring fiasco, the facts need to be sorted out in a court of law so we don't end up with a real injustice based on biased attention getting media reports...
I also don't believe the authorities or either defense or prosecution should leak news to the media... As for keeping a victim's name withheld, if the law does that it should do the same IMO for the accused...what happened to equal rights ?
To: cyncooper
My, you're getting kind of touchy lately, just like sinkspur said.
312
posted on
08/06/2003 2:38:15 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: OPS4
A good case needs no leaks and no prosecutorial rhetoric, prior to the actual trial. There are rules about procedure, and I for one see many of them being stepped on. Then you'll be relieved to know that is not the case here. The prosecutor made these *court filings* two weeks ago and the JUDGE just released them.
I would call that proper procedure.
To: redlipstick
The sources said that the sheriff's original arrest warrant included a misdemeanor claim of false imprisonment." The sheriff said this on TV.
314
posted on
08/06/2003 2:40:18 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Strider
Not to mention going to a guest's room after 11 PM in the hotel where you are EMPLOYED. That's grounds for termination in the hotel I work at. It's called fraternization... A big no no.
315
posted on
08/06/2003 2:40:23 PM PDT
by
rewrite
(Those of you who think you have all the answers tick off those of us who do.)
To: redlipstick
Thank you red. I was going to go look for one of the many articles that mentioned this aspect, but you've saved me the trouble.
:)
To: rolling_stone
I hate to see someone tried in the media..it is just like a mob screaming for blood or sharks on a feeding frenzy...Me, too. And sharks is a good word for them.
And I hate to see NOW get in on this; and I hate to see all the other "agenda driven" groups get in on this.
But the monster has to be fed. So we'll keep hearing the facts according to the media, whether they are true or not. As long as they get their bucks and face time, people's lives don't matter. I can't decide who's worse, the people who leak this information we're hearing or the media who sucks it out of them.
317
posted on
08/06/2003 2:42:12 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: redlipstick
BTW, Fox has a camera trained on the hallway to the courtroom (this really is a ridiculous frenzy) and I really like that potted palm tree.
I wonder what kind it is?
To: cyncooper
I like the Palm tree too: looks real. Look good in my hall-one of those three story halls.
319
posted on
08/06/2003 2:44:00 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: rolling_stone
As for keeping a victim's name withheld, if the law does that it should do the same IMO for the accused...what happened to equal rights ? Hmmm... Some consider it an injustice NOT to reveal the names of the accused. Isn't this what happens in some countries and we object to secret charges and proceedings? hmmm.......
320
posted on
08/06/2003 2:44:03 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 521-534 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson