Skip to comments.
Sen. Bob Graham Just Called for Impeachments On MSNBC Over Supposed Intelligence Failures
MSNBC ^
| July 17, 2003
| Buchanan and Press
Posted on 07/17/2003 2:09:23 PM PDT by ewing
MSNBC is running it as breaking news.. Graham said that there is no way that Tom Delay and the House will have impeachment hearings over the supposed intelligence failures (I assume he is talking about VP Cheney) so 'the people' will have to vote the offending partes out in 2004.
A desperate act of a Presidential candidacy and a political career expiring
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; barkinglikedog; bobgraham; censureandmoveon; desperation; doesnotrise; doublestandard; givememoney; graham; hyposcrisy; impeachment; levelofimpeachment; lookatme; mediabias; mycousinknowsclay; overplayedhand; racetotheleft; runsforpresident; vote4me; wacko; wagthedog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
To: VRWC_minion
So, again when did GOP call for Clinton's impeachment while at war ? As I already said, that's just your irrelevant evasion.
To: Owl_Eagle
And I don't recall us having 150,000 troops on the ground involved in a guerilla war at the time. Again, your parallels are falling woefully short and are poorly reasoned. It's amazing the lengths a "true believer" will go to in order to rationalize their hypocrisy.
To: section9
I must say that your level of ad-hominem is much higher than the other groupies. Congratulations for approaching Carville-hood.
To: Owl_Eagle
I suppose living under a totalitarian regime who systematically murdered rival racial groups, political opponents, and random citizens constitutes more freedom? I guess we all have different definitions, mine is closer to what our Fathers had in mind, yours seems to be closer to that of Fidel Castro. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Not only do you mischaracterize life in Iraq prior to the war, but you speak falsely about the state of life in Iraq under the occupation.
To: CFC__VRWC
This is a real howler, considering that your "arguments" look like they were lifted verbatim from the New York Times. And yours approach the level of a Michael Weiner groupy.
To: Jolly Rodgers
As I already said, that's just your irrelevant evasion.My evasion? It was you accusing that the GOP is acting like the rats. Put up.
106
posted on
07/17/2003 7:48:13 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: Jolly Rodgers
In comparison to the depths of hell they are experiencing at our hands -- yes.I missed the torture of children and adults, the rape of the Iraqi women that Bush is doing. Oh yes, and the 50% of people who say its better now in Baghdad.
I think you are going to take both first and second place.
107
posted on
07/17/2003 7:52:41 PM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: ewing
As Dan would say: Bob you ignorant slut! When are you going to stop whoring for the left and embrace your country?
108
posted on
07/17/2003 8:01:02 PM PDT
by
fightu4it
(Hillary Clinton -- Commander-In-Chief of US Armed Forces? Never.....Never....Never!)
To: PhiKapMom; Joe Brower; katherineisgreat; Ragtime Cowgirl; windchime; MinuteGal
Graham "Crackers" is actually running for Dem VP candidate but I think that Gen. Wesley Clark may challenge him for that spot!
Saw Katherine Harris on Hannity & Combs last night. She said that she wants to continue her work in the House but would answer the call if asked by the President or the Governor to run for the Senate.
109
posted on
07/17/2003 8:51:19 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Blonde Freepers have more FUN than liberals!)
To: JulieRNR21
That's interesting! I figured if they asked her to run she would! Sure didn't understand the other!
Thanks for the update!
110
posted on
07/17/2003 8:54:45 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: JulieRNR21
Saw Katherine Harris on Hannity & Combs last night. She said that she wants to continue her work in the House but would answer the call if asked by the President or the Governor to run for the Senate.It's too soon for her to run for Senate now, IMHO. She's going to be pummelled mercilessly by the media no matter what - having her run for Senate befrore she's even finished her first term in the House gives them a huge opening to exploit.
Now, in 2006, when Nelson is up for re-election...
111
posted on
07/17/2003 9:02:26 PM PDT
by
CFC__VRWC
(Hippies. They want to save the earth, but all they do is smoke dope and smell bad.)
To: marlon
"I think we all should subscribe for their 4 free issues and cancel."
Great idea!!
To: Jolly Rodgers
suppose living under a totalitarian regime who systematically murdered rival racial groups, political opponents, and random citizens constitutes more freedom? I guess we all have different definitions, mine is closer to what our Fathers had in mind, yours seems to be closer to that of Fidel Castro. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. O_ENot only do you mischaracterize life in Iraq prior to the war, but you speak falsely about the state of life in Iraq under the occupation. JR
Alright, please enlighten me on the wonderful utopia that the people of Iraq lived under with Saddam Hussein (D) as opposed to the occupation by the evil American Oppressors. I must have missed something in my extensive study of this situation.
(I should point out that it's intriguing how the dimocraps squeal when they're accused of treason, yet how ready they are to defend the most heinous un-American dictators the world has to offer [Hussein/Kim Chong Il/Castro/Hu Jinato/ Mugabe/ etc.]) Please, enlighten us on what wonderful freedoms the Iraqis enjoyed under the most benevolent Saddam Hussein and how they're so oppressed by our Fascist military men and women.
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
113
posted on
07/17/2003 9:09:13 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
("Europeans lost the will to live the moral life long ago." - Ben Shapiro)
To: dirtboy
Did Weldon speak about how Clinton lied viciously to trick folks into supporting war against Serbia?
To: Jolly Rodgers
As long as occupation troops remain in the country the attacks will continue -- without regard for the political posturing of Reps or Dems. More likely, the attackers of our troops hold high regard torwards the political posturing in this country and their planned victory is based on such!
115
posted on
07/17/2003 9:21:16 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
(V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
To: Jolly Rodgers
And I don't recall us having 150,000 troops on the ground involved in a guerilla war at the time. Again, your parallels are falling woefully short and are poorly reasoned. O_EIt's amazing the lengths a "true believer" will go to in order to rationalize their hypocrisy.JR
You're right. Accused and convicted. I'm a Bush-bot. Anyone who's read my posts knows that I am a true believer, and a mindless slave of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
But while I dash out to buy Lying History to brush up on the truth, can you please illuminate for us all the parallel between Clinton bombing Christians in Yugoslavia based on Penny Marshall's fictious movie Judgment and G.W. Bush's invasion of Iraq based on S/H's ignoring of 18 U.N. Resolutions, documented human rights violations, and the universally accepted build up of WMD's?
Just while we all tune in to CNN and phone in for our NYT subscriptions, so we know the real truth...
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
116
posted on
07/17/2003 9:21:31 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
("Europeans lost the will to live the moral life long ago." - Ben Shapiro)
To: JulieRNR21
Graham is an embarrassment to our state, but I hope he is the VP candidate for the dems. His strange behavior and over-the-top comments would insure a Bush/Cheney victory!
To: ewing
BG better run for the presidency. It will be a good excuse when he loses his next election.
118
posted on
07/17/2003 9:30:26 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: CFC__VRWC
It's too soon for her to run for Senate now, IMHO. She's going to be pummelled mercilessly by the media no matter what - having her run for Senate befrore she's even finished her first term in the House gives them a huge opening to exploit. Now, in 2006, when Nelson is up for re-election... My thoughts exactly.....she needs to get more experience in DC...2006 would be good timing!
119
posted on
07/17/2003 9:32:14 PM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Blonde Freepers have more FUN than liberals!)
To: LS
Every one of their stupid little "bush bombs" that they throw at the administration is essentially responsible for killing a U.S. soldier in Iraq. Constructive criticisms of the war directed at the president is fair game. Propaganda about the war directed at the president will only lead to more killings of our soldiers.
This BS Uranium thingy is pure death.
120
posted on
07/17/2003 9:36:03 PM PDT
by
FreeReign
(V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson