Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Conservative Book Service ^ | 12 July 2003 | Conservative Book Service Email

[PhiKapMom]

Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:

Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.

In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.

Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.

Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:

• Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President

• How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush

• The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy

• Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists

• The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs

• Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office

• Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs

• How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)

You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.

[steve8714]

She is only a good campaigner in tightly controlled events filled with friendlies. The problem is that the TV replays over and over, making them seem real and crowded with just plain folks. If she is Perz and he is Secretary General, watch out. SG seems to be a life term.

[sweetliberty]

"Even in SoDak, where we lost (IMO due to Libertarians)"

Actually, in South Dakota, there is little doubt that our loss was due to election fraud.

[BOBTHENAILER]

If this is true that she really is considering running, then it explains the last few days and that attacks by the media on President Bush that were started by a bogus source of Capitol Hill Blue's, Doug Thompson, and Mr. Wilson who happens to be a DemocRAT operative it seems!

I think your take on this is right on target. The slimy worms are starting to crawl out of the dung heap, in order to begin the attacks on Bush.

Classic Clinton character defamation, using their "moles" left over in various departments. When I say "moles", I use it in the classic cold war spy definition, as that is their way. Follow the old communist model to acheive your aims. Any lie to advance the cause of "The State" is justified.

I said it on another thread and I'll repeat it hear:

Bring 'em on, better to lance the BOIL now, once and for all times, then to let it fester and spread it's VILE infection throughout our body politic.

[woodyinscc]

On the day that fat boy Teddy finally croaks, the tax man will not be cleaning out his bank account.

The man who once claimed that money meant nothing to him, has now joined this group of elitists. Fat boy clinton has four foundations that I know of and he will be living off of, and advancing his legacy and ideology through his Presidential Library Foundation!!

I must point out that there are a lot of legitimate foundations that follow the original intent.

[ntnychik]

I'm sure you are right there will be plenty of opposition to Hillary all over the country. We must remember that we vote one (live) person at a time. It won't just be a matter of who legitimately votes, but can we counteract the fraud. She must not be underestimated. Glad you all are wise to her!!

[mathluv]

Thanks for the list. I remember it from all the speculation when Reagan was shot.

[OKSooner]

I've been saying all along she's got to run in 2004 because she won't be able to win her Senate seat back in 2008 UNLESS there's something HORRIBLE in Rudy Guiliani's FBI file, which she no doubt has. Otherwise, she loses to Rudy in 2006 when she tries for reelection and has no elected office to run from in 2008.

She's definitely running in 2004. Do she and her husband have something dirty up their sleeve? They're about to redefine the meaning of the word, and the media will be all to happy to help them with it. Go to Vegas and bet on it if you can.

(BTW, what's the story on the QB position going into fall practice? Someone must have messed up pretty bad...)

[Texas Eagle]

I just cant stand the thought of making it any easier for Hillary.

It's too bad President Bush can't stand the thought of making it easier for Hillary. But, hey, if he doesn't want my vote, more power to him. All he has to do is utter those brilliant words Bobdole spoke shortly after Conservatives won a hard-fought Republican Party Platform at the 1996 Convention: "I am not bound by any Platform. The exits are clearly marked."

I've been asked to leave stuffier joints than the Republican Party.

[Victoria Delsoul]

Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency.

Why should anyone be surprised about their machiavellian tactics and machinations to bring their opponents down. Regarding Hillary running for the presidency, sooner or later this is going to be the case.

I agree with you, we have to fight for the election of GW.

[Calpernia]

ok. I didn't know that. So Clinton gives up US citizenship and becomes a citizen of Ireland. He would do that to hold office.

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Thanks for the post and the ping. Hillary would probably enjoy this...read the rules of her mentor Saul Alinsky. We need to hold the Rats accountable and not give them credit and authority they don't deserve. The press is doing the same thing to Saddam and Bin Laden, hyping those 'losers without a future' to undermine the President and our efforts in Iraq. It deserves scorn (and outrage) from us, not fear and compliance.

Hillary can't win on national defense.

America supports the troops.

You can not support Hillary and support the troops. Can't be done.

My subject line in my mass-emailing yesterday:

4 years? DEMS can't handle 4 MONTHS in Iraq. US troops kicking bad guy derriere DAILY:

Too much? (^;

Enough of the Hillary hype. Every time I read or see a puff piece on Hillary, I think about OUR un-American press mocking OUR honorable troops daily with chicken little reporting from Iraq. I aim to expose this press and this women on behalf of our troops.

Bring 'em on.

[PhilDragoo]

You can not support Hillary and support the troops.

You go, girl.

Hitlery's party stole our servicemen and women's votes last time.

NEVER FORGET

Regarding Saul Alinsky, per Barbara Olson, Hitlery's sealed thesis on Alinsky was a paean to that radical who counselled, "Tell any lie for power."

[ALOHA RONNIE]

NEVER FORGET


Friend of Terrorist HO CHI MINH =

HILLARY RODHAM
BILL CLINTON
JOHN KERRY
WALTER CRONKITE


NEVER FORGET

[potlatch]

It is my understanding they donate their dirty laundry to charity for tax deductions ;-)

Another smart - A !! LOL!!

[MeekOneGOP]

Bring 'em on.

Yeah, bring it on !!

[MeekOneGOP]

[MeekOneGOP]

I thought you'd like this one from some years back, I found recently.

[potlatch]

Don't do that again. Restraint please!

Too many black pantsuits, huh?? Or maybe just ONE, as we suspect!! LOL

[PhiKapMom]

I am not a person who believes 2004 will be like 1992. I just think this will be a nasty campaign. I believe that President Bush will win in the end because there is no credible 3rd party candidate to run like Perot although Perot and credible should not be used in the same sentence.

I was in Texas in 1992 and still cannot believe people swallowed the Perot line!

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Hitlery's party stole our servicemen and women's votes last time.

We won't forget, Phil. Nothing energized me more than to have OUR DEM-press shove Hillary on the troops after the same DEM-press condemned OUR CIC for thanking the troops on the Lincoln. Their concern for the welfare of our troops (and our national security) appears as skin-deep as their 'diversity'.