Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Conservative Book Service ^ | 12 July 2003 | Conservative Book Service Email

[PhiKapMom]

Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:

Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.

In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.

Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.

Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:

• Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President

• How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush

• The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy

• Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists

• The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs

• Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office

• Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs

• How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)

You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.

[Paul C. Jesup]

Of course the next action after this, if she got elected, would be an open armed revolt.

[GatekeeperBookman]

China.

[GatekeeperBookman]

Bingo

[GatekeeperBookman]

Please see my brief post #280

[Eldorado431]

easy, what is the presidential candidacy deadline? (not that the law would ever stop them.)
Exactly!!!
I Certainly hope Hillary's College Thesis becomes Public Information Should She Run for President in 2004 or 2008. The People have the right to know who her Idles are.

[GatekeeperBookman]

You should organize your data & publish-sooner rather than later. If Hitlary wins, publishing will be in Chinese.

[GatekeeperBookman]

An uglier prospect-I fear the possiblity.

The communists flooded us with propagandists & 'workers' who tried to foment revolution in the '30's & failed. I knew family members who saw this in their work place. McCarthy was entirely correct.
This time it's comming from the top & our society is not smart enough to reject it. Ordinary people might think they have no alternative to violence & the fed's would be happy to engage. Very ugly.

[Paul C. Jesup]

The communists flooded us with propagandists & 'workers' who tried to foment revolution in the '30's & failed. I knew family members who saw this in their work place.

My grandmother (who is still living) told me about that and that she and her father both saw through it from the start.

This time it's comming from the top & our society is not smart enough to reject it. Ordinary people might think they have no alternative to violence & the fed's would be happy to engage. Very ugly.

On the bright side, I think if a revolt does happen, most of the military will join in on the revolt, mainly because they loath the Clintons just as much, if not more, than we do.

If an armed revolt did happen, I would not be suprised if the death toll reached into the tens of millions.

[The Wizard]

the beast will never enter the White House as President

[ricpic]

"....the beast will never enter the White House as President..."

Really? Why does she have to run a brilliant campaign to win the presidency? As a Democratic female she is assured of at least 40 - 45% of the female vote just because of her sex. Democrats, no matter who they are, get over 90% of the black vote. So, right at the outset, she has half the votes.

If she presents herself as a "moderate," which she will, and the major media run interference for her, which they will, she's in.

[Ronin]

Horrifying would be a better word. I have no doubt that Hillary plans to run and plans to win, no matter who or what or where is broken to do it.

That woman is plain evil.

[GatekeeperBookman]

Hope you are correct-the military taking sides would shut down a failed executive. Keystone Cops with Fed badges can't deal with the military. Pray very hard-I do.

Imagine a fresh, open election, where the media controls nothing. I would take Sgt. Rummey as election judge. There's a sweet dream. Maybe the Sick Supremes would be put back to dealing with traffic tickets.

[varon]

I remember when Reagan was running in 1994 -- it was supposed to be close according the media but he wiped the floor with Mondale!

Oh puleeze, how can you possibly compare Mondale to the Clinton Crime Syndicate? The cavalier attitude of W's invincibility might just be his greatest downfall.

[varon]

I doubt he'd bring up her dirty laundry.

I doubt she has any. It is my understanding they donate their dirty laundry to charity for tax deductions ;-)

[Delmarksman]

bttt

[mathluv]

This has always been my fear. There are too many dead bodies between the "Clintoons" and what they want. That is my main fear for Dubya. The willing accomplices is the media will roll over and play dead for the evil ones.

Does anyone remember the 'legend' of the presidents elected in the years ending in 0?

[WFTR]

I still don't see Hillary as a big threat in 2004 or necessarily in 2008. I don't doubt that she's as evil as this thread claims, but I don't see her having the appeal to win the presidency. She did well in New York because New York is so liberal. She still won't do well across the rest of the country. No matter how she tried to spin herself, she's just not someone that people like. I suspect that part of why she has that bitter edge to her personality is that she is angry that she'll never be widely liked.

While there are some conditions in 2004 that might be similar to those of 1992, the Presidents Bush are very different men in very different situations. After the entire communist bloc fell and we handily won Desert Storm, stupid people were ready to believe that everything in the world was forever going to be safe. Stupid people like to vote for Democrats, but they sometimes vote for Republicans because they know that Republican competence is needed when dealing with a dangerous world. Unfortunately, President Bush (41) didn't make the case that the world would forever be a dangerous place and that Republican competence is always a good thing. When Lee Atwater died, the administration lost the man who was apparently the only one who understood anything about campaigning. I saw the president at a campaign stop in October of '92, and he did very poorly. I think the campaign was always in disarray.

No matter how well we do in Iraq over the next year, people aren't going to be stupid enough to believe that the world is suddenly a safe place. I think it will be much harder to make them believe that everything is forever going to be okay and therefore electing Democrats is safe. Furthermore, I think that the political team for this President Bush will be better than the team for 41.

I'm not saying that we should be complacent. The president certainly can't afford to alienate core conservative voters. However, trying to claim that 2004 will be analogous to 1992 is wrong.

WFTR
Bill

[yoe]

”...despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.”

She isn’t just ‘mulling’ this over, she is campaigning with her book signings – this is her trial balloon. The press and media are once again telling us how wonderful she is...write and rebut every review on her book and every editorial that slants in her favor. Eight years of the Clinton debauchery and demagoguery of America, her Constitution, the rule of law is enough of this trash. NO TO HILLARY!!!

New York your junior senator is using you and she has LIED to you, is LYING to you! Dump her and her Socialist/Marxist base! This is America! - not some Third World country for the junior senator to play with.

[Radix]

"...I don't see her having the appeal to win the presidency."

 

Hillary has the Democrat nomination at the drop of a hat.  If she jumped in on the day before the 1st primary, she would win in a landslide. The type of persons who vote in Democrat primaries, are the very type of persons who would vote for Hillary.  She has the nomination anytime that she wants it. The only thing that prevents her from seeking it, is the fact of "W''s" perceived invincibility. Right now the Dem's smell blood because of this current "tempest in a teapot" concerning the SOTU speech. That is just nonsense, but it is all that they can come up with. The liberal media is just carrying water for them over this BS. 

 

 Hillary Beast is making some small noises because she needs to keep the media and the Democrat presidential wannabes in line. She ain't running in 2004 unless they have a freaking tape of the President conspiring to initiate a war based on fraudulent provocations, or worse.

 

The wicked witch clearly has her eyes set on the on the 2008 Election. She is just putting out a few pings right now, getting the competition in order, so to speak..

 

[sweetliberty]

Don't you think a lot of the same people would vote for Bush though, if the alternative was Hillary? Even my dad, who admits to not voting at all for quite a few years says that if Hillary ran he would have to vote just to vote against her. Nobody with a brain or any care for this country wants to see the Clintons back in the White House, especially with Hillary at the helm.

If this comes to pass, election fraud will aim for an all time high and the fabricated dirt against Bush this past week will seem trivial compared to what they'll come up with. We have a big responsibility to get out there and educate people about Hillary and her crimes and remind people how tired the nation was under the burden of all the Clinton scandals none of which are truly resolved. They also need to be reminded of how vulnerable we became under the Clinton loathing of the military and the fact that bin Laden could have been taken and wasn't, on a couple of differernt occasions....because it wasn't a high priority.

The Clintons are criminals and they belong in prison, NOT in public office. Most people, even those not enamored with Bush, realize that.