Why is Crapitol Hill Blue whitewashing their forum?

Crapitol Hill Blue ^ | 7-11-03 | Registered

[Registered]

Hey, I can understand them pulling anything TLBSHOW posts (hehehe), but there are lots of comments being pulled, and most concern the recent discovery that Crapitol Hill Blue has been using an unnamed source that doesn't exist and that has left a vapor trail after being in contact with Doug Thompson for over 20 years!

[hole_n_one]

LOL!

[Lancey Howard]

Here's a clue:
Max Headroom.

[TomServo]

I guess you either believe him or you don't.

Actually - I'm still fence-sitting on the whole thing. But I seen from others that's he's made more than one apology for "errant" stories.

[TomServo]

I = I've....Tylenol PM attack...

[nopardons]

The dumbing down of society, not to mention SESEMIE STREET's complicity in shortening people's ability to concentrate for any length of time,has resulted in the fact that most won't question something they don't remeber; if they even knew in the first place.

Waffling is what Dems are great exemplars of. Has it mattered lately ? Nope. Is all of this just positioning, in order to take down President Bush ? YOU BET IT IS ! Will any news of proof be given time ? NO, NOT MUCH, IF AT ALL! Will it matter ? I DON'T KNOW.

[185JHP]

He's gone? Great news!!!

[185JHP]

TLBSHOW did some good work in the past on "Capitol Grilling", the nastiest leftist site I ever went to very often.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

I wonder what Ann Coulter thinks of that photo.

[nopardons]

Max Headroom ? I used to watch that. That's a clue ?

[Mo1]

I thought Thompson owned CHB and Dog found where a deal had fallen through to buy it.

it fell through?

BTW .. did anyone every find out the names of those who were in that Company/Corp/Whatever?

[PeaceBeWithYou]

Doug Thompson Bio @ CHB.

Doug Thompson Media

[Dont Mention the War]

All of the congressmen and senators who today say that the yellow cake material is the reason why they voted, now say that if they had known this one quote was wrong, they wouldn't have voted that way. How does this make them look to their constituents? Won't they see them as waffling, and men that do not stand up for their convictions?

It makes them look like liars, since the vote was months before the SotU.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Excellent point, because in the orignal photo that TLBShow had on his page, they were standing side-by-side. To contort that picture in such a way, seems really silly. Isn't TLBShow married? What would his wife think?

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Very true. But, they are known liars, as opposed to our President who according to the leftist is a "closet" liar who must be hauled onto the carpet.

[ladyinred]

I have read in one of the Hillary biographies the story you posted, only from a different source. Not only did she rewrite the rules, she tried to make it so that Nixon would be denied a lawyer. She is a devious, evil, wicked woman, and these are her good points. Although these truths about her are out there, people who don't read books will never know about them, as the mainstream media sure won't tell us!

[Lauratealeaf]

The dumbing down of society, not to mention SESEMIE STREET's complicity in shortening people's ability to concentrate for any length of time,has resulted in the fact that most won't question something they don't remeber; if they even knew in the first place.

I never liked Sesame Street. Especially Big Bird. He had a very gay voice and I didn't appreciate that around my kids. Plus Ernie and Bert seemed grown up and were living together. Cookie Monster was always stealing and the humans on the show were so diversified that I got what they were trying to do. The only white guy on the show also seemed very effeminate.

[Mo1]

And that's likely why Hillary Diane Rodham, who regarded Nixon as "evil," according to Clinton biographer David Maraniss, had to discard impeachment rules in place for two centuries in order to nail her quarry.

She sure has a habbit of changing the rules

I forget where I read it .. but wasn't there one guy who was shaking his head and stunned at the way Hellary handle the Nixon case?

[Mo1]

she tried to make it so that Nixon would be denied a lawyer

Good Grief ..

What is the name of this book

[PhiKapMom]

Sure was! One of the attorneys that worked on it went to his boss after Nixon resigned and said what had happened -- at least one person had a conscience as to what Hillary had pulled.

[PhiKapMom]

Here is the link and complete story from Newsmax:

http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/10/1/55325

How Hillary Nuked Nixon
Carl Limbacher
October 1, 1998

"This is the most fun we've had since Watergate." -- Washington Post managing editor Ben Bradlee, during the Iran-Contra investigation.
OYSTER BAY, N.Y. -- On July 12, Charles McCarry's New York Times op-ed piece was titled, "Bill Clinton's John Dean?" It was a rumination on the similarities between Linda Tripp and the White House counsel who turned on Richard Nixon, thereby setting Watergate's wheels in motion.

As intriguing as the comparison was, the real eye-opener of McCarry's piece came toward the end, when he quoted Henry Ruth, Leon Jaworski's Watergate deputy prosecutor. McCarry recalled Ruth's memo, sent to Jaworski just 10 days after supposed "smoking gun" evidence forced Nixon into ignoble early retirement, which cited 10 areas of Watergate then under criminal investigation.

Ruth informed Jaworski: "None of these matters at the moment rises to the level of our ability to prove even a probable criminal violation by Mr. Nixon."

McCarry followed the Ruth quote with his own observation that the ultimate historical irony here was that Richard Nixon, whom historians have told us for 24 years had been caught dead to rights, may not have needed a pardon after all.

What about the June 23, 1972, "smoking gun" tape where Nixon ordered the CIA to block the FBI's Watergate investigation? Or where Nixon discussed the possibility of paying hush money to the Watergate burglars? Or the so-called enemies list kept by the Nixon White House on reporters hostile to the administration? Apparently, prosecutor Ruth couldn't find any evidence regarding these transgressions that he thought would stand up in court.

The tapes, however, sounded damning enough. And even Nixon, who at first thought those recordings would be exculpatory, realized after he reviewed them that his goose was cooked – politically, if not legally.

In July 1974, as the House Judiciary Committee was reviewing the tapes and earmarking Nixon's supposed crimes, two young staffers were assigned by the committee's chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, to research the protocols for impeachment. John Labovitz and another young lawyer, just 26 years old with the ink barely dry on her Yale law degree, began the arduous task of poring over constitutional archives. Labovitz's partner was Hillary Diane Rodham.

And research done by Labovitz and Rodham became the roadmap for three articles of impeachment reported out of the House Judiciary Committee that promptly destroyed any remaining congressional support for Nixon. Before the full House vote on the articles of impeachment, three senior Republican senators apprised Nixon of the handwriting on the wall. The Nixon presidency ended on Aug. 8, 1974.

The House Judiciary Committee’s former chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, waited 22 years to unleash his bombshell, which would reveal that the deck was stacked against Nixon by none other than the wife of the man who now faces a similar fate. It was Hillary Clinton who rigged the proceedings against the 37th president, as Zeifman revealed in a little-noticed passage of his 1996 book, "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot."

Zeifman quoted his own 1974 diary, which reports that just four days after Nixon resigned "John Labovitz came to my office and apologized for having participated to some extent to conceal from me the work that was being done. Some months ago, he and Hillary lied intentionally to me and told me there were no drafts of proposed rules of procedure for the [Nixon] impeachment inquiry."

The New York Daily News noticed this earthquake confession, and sought Zeifman's elaboration on the historic subterfuge perpetrated by our current first lady. The Daily News reported:

If the United States was going to topple its own president, rules were important, Zeifman told us Friday. "Suppose we were going to have the World Series next week and suddenly one of the team managers says, 'We want to change the rules to two strikes and you're out.'"

That's basically what [Hillary] Clinton and Labovitz did, Zeifman claims. In other words, they drew up new impeachment protocols to replace those in existence since Jefferson's day -- and then denied it. Congress -- and the country -- would have been completely polarized if it had seemed Nixon was being railroaded out of office with new rules, Zeifman said. (New York Daily News – Feb.12, 1996)

Nixon was likely guilty of the Watergate cover-up. But Ruth's memo to Jaworski shows there really wasn’t any "smoking gun" evidence of it.

And that's likely why Hillary Diane Rodham, who regarded Nixon as "evil," according to Clinton biographer David Maraniss, had to discard impeachment rules in place for two centuries in order to nail her quarry.

Now that America faces its second impeachment crisis in as many generations, it's worth remembering how the rules were bent by partisans committed to destroying a presidency -- when the target was Richard Nixon. And how the media looked the other way when it happened.