Why is Crapitol Hill Blue whitewashing their forum?

Crapitol Hill Blue ^ | 7-11-03 | Registered

[Registered]

Hey, I can understand them pulling anything TLBSHOW posts (hehehe), but there are lots of comments being pulled, and most concern the recent discovery that Crapitol Hill Blue has been using an unnamed source that doesn't exist and that has left a vapor trail after being in contact with Doug Thompson for over 20 years!

[Paul Atreides]

However, I didn't notice a lot of anti-Bush stuff from TLBSHOW.

Ooops! That should read that I DID notice a lot of anti-Bush stuff from TLBSHOW.

[hole_n_one]

YOU ARE RIGHT!

If arasina is right, that would make me wrong........

and ya know what?

I'm not wrong.

[arasina]

He may try to clean up by sifting the CHB litter box but he left a few turds over here at FR that he can't remove. And the stench of Madman at 1600 is still pretty strong.

[Reagan Man]

>>>Last I checked Barnacle was a RAT!

Yes indeed! A liberal RAT!

[nopardons]

The same ones, in Doug's fevered imagination. It's ALL just more lies from Thompson. That's what he repeatedly does ... LIES.

Your right, of course, about the " criminal " aspects. :-)

[Pan_Yans Wife]

My mistake... I do believe you.

No, it's just that my memory was jogged, and I was thinking of something else, not really paying attention to what I was typing. I believe what you said about his show. I was just thinking of the Limbaugh show and something else at the time.

I apologize.

[Calpernia]

Good info, thanks. I was mostly curious as to learning the environment.

[PhiKapMom]

Look what I found on Hillary from Newsmax in 1998:

Excerpt from How Hillary Nuked Nixon http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/10/1/55325

And research done by Labovitz and Rodham became the roadmap for three articles of impeachment reported out of the House Judiciary Committee that promptly destroyed any remaining congressional support for Nixon. Before the full House vote on the articles of impeachment, three senior Republican senators apprised Nixon of the handwriting on the wall. The Nixon presidency ended on Aug. 8, 1974.

The House Judiciary Committee’s former chief counsel, Jerome Zeifman, waited 22 years to unleash his bombshell, which would reveal that the deck was stacked against Nixon by none other than the wife of the man who now faces a similar fate. It was Hillary Clinton who rigged the proceedings against the 37th president, as Zeifman revealed in a little-noticed passage of his 1996 book, "Without Honor: The Impeachment of President Nixon and the Crimes of Camelot."

Zeifman quoted his own 1974 diary, which reports that just four days after Nixon resigned "John Labovitz came to my office and apologized for having participated to some extent to conceal from me the work that was being done. Some months ago, he and Hillary lied intentionally to me and told me there were no drafts of proposed rules of procedure for the [Nixon] impeachment inquiry."

The New York Daily News noticed this earthquake confession, and sought Zeifman's elaboration on the historic subterfuge perpetrated by our current first lady. The Daily News reported:

If the United States was going to topple its own president, rules were important, Zeifman told us Friday. "Suppose we were going to have the World Series next week and suddenly one of the team managers says, 'We want to change the rules to two strikes and you're out.'"

That's basically what [Hillary] Clinton and Labovitz did, Zeifman claims. In other words, they drew up new impeachment protocols to replace those in existence since Jefferson's day -- and then denied it. Congress -- and the country -- would have been completely polarized if it had seemed Nixon was being railroaded out of office with new rules, Zeifman said. (New York Daily News – Feb.12, 1996)

Nixon was likely guilty of the Watergate cover-up. But Ruth's memo to Jaworski shows there really wasn’t any "smoking gun" evidence of it.

And that's likely why Hillary Diane Rodham, who regarded Nixon as "evil," according to Clinton biographer David Maraniss, had to discard impeachment rules in place for two centuries in order to nail her quarry.

[Calpernia]

Thanks. As you can see....I'm not embarrassed to ask questions ;)

[hole_n_one]

No problemo, P_Y W

[arasina]

Maybe you're right on what you were talking about, but we weren't talking about the same thing. I was referring to his screenname meaning and my interpretation not about banishment.

[Dont Mention the War]

I didn't even know that they had been "reprimanded." Illbay was always cordial to me. However, I didn't notice a lot of anti-Bush stuff from TLBSHOW.

I don't remember what Illbay did to get suspended. But I'm pretty sure I read he was granted an offer to return if he'd behave himself (whatever that means vis-a-vis Illbay and TPTB here), and he told them to shove it. So he's in a sort of self-imposed exile.

TLB got banned for this thread (there's nothing there now but Jim's reason for killing the thread and suspending TLB), although I think it wasn't so much for the original post itself as it was for something he said inside of it. I think he just pushed the Bush-bashing too far, but I'm only inferring; I didn't see the relevant part of the thread that led Jim finally told TLB to TAH (take a hike).

[Lauratealeaf]

Just mulling here.

If you had read him more you would have been less impressed. He needed to take a remedial English grammar and spelling class. Typos are typos but his spelling and grammar left a lot to be desired.

[nopardons]

Doug " claimed " that he wrote an apology to President Bush back then. Doug now " claims that he got this , THE PRESIDENT LIED , info from a man named Wilkinson. Doug LIES , he prevaricates , heck, he'll say anything at all ... and he does.

Doug Thompson HATES the Bush family. He especially now hates President Bush the younger. Is Doug " sorry "? Well, he's sorry , that once agian FREEPERs are after his hide, are after him, are shredding his spurious, vile, disgusting tripe and ARE on to him. He's hidding evidence as fast as he can delete it. He hasn't shown his " sorry " self here and, if past history is any judge, he won't, until there's yet another disgusting, libelous, false ,article filled with venumous lies posted to FR and disected...for yet another time. Then, there'll be ANOTHER sorry excuse of an aoplogy, that WILL be yet anither lie.

[Calpernia]

Now that is interesting. I had no idea TBLSHOW was an issue. But as soon as I started posting here, I had a problem with Illbay. I got into a Islam debate with him on a few threads. I had bad feelings at the way our threads went. (yes I'm leaving it as bad feelings. I decline to interject more cause I would prefer more info than make a speculation)

[Dont Mention the War]

The damage done by Doug Thompson's irresponsibility, stoked by his animus towards George W. Bush, had been minor, but was there nonetheless. Few people care about retractions. Fortunately, it appears that this was caught in time, the desires of Aaron Brown of CNN notwithstanding.

The thing to remember is that as few as two to five years ago, we would not have been able to catch this at all, or do anything meaningful with the information if we had. The "mainstream" media would simply have run with it until they were out of breath to bleat any further, and it would have done immense harm to the Bush Administration. Instead, all we get is Aaron Brown completely flummoxing David Ensor, who was left sputtering on live national television, "Uh, I'm not really sure what you're talking about..." and CBS News being forced to retract (if only by stealth) their lies.

We have truly taken over the news process. The only thing left to do is get more readers, viewers, CITIZENS, to look to those of us who report on the reporters and analyze the analysts. And we win more of them over every day.

[nopardons]

Doug is a congenital liar and not a good one. No one, least of all FREEPERs, should believe one word he writes. Since this is NOT the first time this has happened, there is absolutely NO credibility ; none whatsoever.

The subsiquent apologies, both attempt to play on the readers' heartstrings, while covering over Doug's culpabilities in the matter. The " apologies " are bogus. His articles are vile, error filled, unsubstanciated diatribes of his own fetid imagination.

[Nick Danger]

Yet, shortly after I, Registered, Miss Marple, Nick Danger, Ragtime Cowgirl, and most importantly, the intrepid William McKinley began wondering why this guy didn't even show up in Whois or any other source

I haven't pressed this, because I figured Thompson was getting enough grief. But I still have the worry bit set on those two articles from months ago that I had found, which also contained quotations from supposedly-prominent people who had left no tracks whatsoever in Google, Nexis, or anywhere else I looked. His trusted sources stay below the radar better than any I've ever seen.

Either that, or they don't exist.

[Calpernia]

I honestly didn't know him outside of the threads I'm referencing.

I never hold typos or grammar against message posts because I am guilty. I often have multi browsers open and work while posting. I've posted MANY times with words omitted, typos, wrong words used...cause I'm working while typing.

So, I wouldn't gauge by that.

[hole_n_one]

I was referring to his screenname meaning and my interpretation not about banishment.

Are you having a problem with following what is being posted?

You offered what you thought the meaning of tlbshow was.

P_Y W responded to you and that specific post with YOU ARE RIGHT .

My subsequent response to P_Y w had nothing to do with banning and everything to do with that little fat twerp and his name, tlbshow

It's really not that hard to follow along.