Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WEB SELLERS BURN TAX-DODGE PUFFERS
New York Post ^ | 6/29/03 | AL GUART

Posted on 06/29/2003 1:49:58 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:15:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

New Yorkers dodging heavy taxes on cigarettes by buying from Native American sellers on the Internet could be hearing soon from the taxman.

Under a settlement in the federal appeals court, the Ojibwa Trading Post, a popular online cigarette vendor based in upstate New York, has agreed to report its sales and hand over customer names to authorities every two weeks, effective immediately.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: addicts; alctobaccofirearms; atf; cigarettes; cigarettetaxes; indians; internet; nativeamericans; newyork; pufflist; reservations; stinkyclothes; stinkyfingers; taxes; tobacco; tobaccotaxes; websales; yellowteeth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Semper911
Very cool...but their wine is a little on the pricey side. (And probably smells a bit like tobacco. :)
41 posted on 06/29/2003 1:36:20 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Quitting, my dear sir, has never been an American response.

Did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? No!
42 posted on 06/29/2003 1:37:46 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
JBT's at it again.
43 posted on 06/29/2003 1:38:10 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (Liberals - "The suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
You forget about the millions of two-fers out here. I've been fighting the MJ battle for forty years, incarcerated for it in '66/'67, and now in my dotage I've got to start hiding my tobaccy.

Don't think so, FRiend.

Better to die on your feet than live on your knees, as somebody or other once said.

44 posted on 06/29/2003 1:54:09 PM PDT by metesky (Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; Gabz
Wolfie, I like you and I completely understand your point; that said, Gabz is right.

I think a large majority of tobacco smokers haven't bought into the demonization of marijuana users, but maybe didn't see that train a comin' toward them.

I've been against the WOSD from the getgo. It's a war on personal liberties and the tobacco jihad is just a ratcheting up.

We're natural allies, though there will always be detractors, as Gabz pointed out.

45 posted on 06/29/2003 1:58:03 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Tobacco is verboten in her house, but weed is not? The human capacity for double standards never ceases to amaze me.
46 posted on 06/29/2003 2:08:12 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
Wow, hard to believe anyone could be confused by my post. It's risible to complain about "posturing" then equate a cigarette sales tax to Nazis rounding up the Jews. It's moronic to do both in the same post.
47 posted on 06/29/2003 2:53:56 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: metesky
The Stamp Act analogy is incorrect. The colonists were not objecting to taxation per se, but taxation without representation in Parliament.

We have representation, however imperfect. It's our very own legislatures that are voting all these stupid tobacco taxes because (1) they think a majority of their constituents want those laws and (2) they don't think those who disagree are sufficiently politically powerful or well organized to do anything about it.

Moral: if you don't like the taxes, change the lawmakers who put them in, and get rid of the taxes.

48 posted on 06/29/2003 2:56:17 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump ... thank God for Texas.
49 posted on 06/29/2003 3:19:48 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
Your response is the template for brushing aside the Nazi analogy by claiming it diminishes the suffering of the Jews, while ignoring the overall Nazi philosophy that the Master Race needed to be engineered by the state. This is a cheap and easy way to deflect the argument.

In the Wonderful World O' Nazis, the assumption was that individuals' bodies and lives were the property of that state.

This approach is so inimical to the vision of the Founders and the purpose of the U. S. Constitution that I'm astounded anyone posting on a conservative forum doesn't instinctively get it.

Individuals have been replaced by "groups" thanks to years of government school dumbing down and subsequent brainwashing, so it's apparently become perfectly acceptable to some that a particular group can be picked off and onerously taxed for the "greater good" of other groups. After all, we're "all" paying for health care. (A bogus argument, since smokers pay more than they get, and by the way socialist thinking to the core.)

I would argue that you are the one doing the posturing as a conservative.

50 posted on 06/29/2003 4:16:29 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
The Stamp Act analogy is incorrect. The colonists were not objecting to taxation per se, but taxation without representation in Parliament.

One of the points I've been trying to make for five years on this forum is that we are not represented now, and become less and less so as population increases and the House remains static at 435.

51 posted on 06/29/2003 5:38:38 PM PDT by metesky (Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge
The difference between us "Madame" is not that I'm not conservative but that I have a sense of proportion.
52 posted on 06/29/2003 7:12:46 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; metesky; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; ...
It's the American's duty to shop cheap. It's our right.

If the Native American's are going to start turning over customer lists, then why don't they just tax the damn cigarettes they sell, and be done with it!

And I sure can't understand how the FEDS can do this. What with all the Internet Auction sites that aren't collecting taxes for sales. I think they should worry about the Internet auction houses, don't you?

BTW, Presque Isle, Maine Native Americans are going to open up a store and sell tax free cigarettes. Our Guv is having a fit! heh!

53 posted on 06/30/2003 8:34:05 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
The best way to foil the taxman who places outrageous taxes on cigarettes is not to smoke. If you don't purchase cigarettes, you won't have to pay the taxes.

How about rolling my own? Instead of paying into the state coffers for a carton of cigarettes that cost anywhere from $44 to $50 dollars a carton, I roll a beautiful carton for under $8.00.

There's more ways to skin a cat, you know. Why should I give up something I truely enjoy? And have enjoyed for many years.

54 posted on 06/30/2003 8:35:54 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
:::Sigh::: You are right, of course. I will try once again to quit.

Why the hell should you give up something you enjoy? ROLL YOUR OWN. Save the money to buy something else. Let the state pound sand!


55 posted on 06/30/2003 8:37:24 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Cry me a river.
56 posted on 06/30/2003 8:40:31 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
They don't want to let us smoke but they want that blood money. The creepy little combover creeps.
57 posted on 06/30/2003 8:46:33 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Read Buddy's, (the labrador retriever), new book about the Clintons, "Living Hell")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Better to die on your feet than live on your knees, as somebody or other once said.

Oh my goodness, metesky! GOOD one! heh!

58 posted on 06/30/2003 8:52:48 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What a joke. When will the govt. learn. People will continue to seek cheaper cigarettes, wherever they can find them. If Indian Reservation smokes dries up, then cheaper cigarettes will pop up somewhere else and the state will spend all or more of their cigarette revenue trying to shut down the new source. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb, when they could be spending it on something worthwhile.
59 posted on 06/30/2003 8:54:00 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; Madame Dufarge
As I said I despise hypocrites.

And as Madame indicated, we should all be allies.

And I consider tobacco smokers who want weed kept illegal and users jailed to be just as hypocritical as weed users wanting to see tobacco outlawed.

60 posted on 06/30/2003 8:55:52 AM PDT by Gabz (anti-smokers = personification of everything wrong in this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson