Skip to comments.
Split Decision: Supreme court upholds grad policy, strikes Undergrad
MSNBC Live
| 06-23-03
Posted on 06/23/2003 7:15:56 AM PDT by Brian S
Supreme Court rules in favor of U. of Michigan Admissions Policy
TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; criticalmass; dredscott; education; korematsu; minorities; roevwade; ruling; scotus; uofm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 641-647 next last
To: justshe
Second ruling has been STRUCK DOWN
41
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:18 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Brian S
Undergrad AA struck down by SC, per FoxNews.
42
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:19 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: goldstategop
Well, I guess they struck down the undergrad program, so there's at least some good news!
43
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:19 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: AntiGuv
We can thank George Bush Sr. for appointing the far left liberal David Souter to the Court and Gerald Ford for appointing the same JP Stevens to the Court. They were told at the time that these were horrible appointments and they went forward with them anyway.
44
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:24 AM PDT
by
laconic
To: CollegeRepublican
$100,000 in tuition over a certain number of years.
45
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:35 AM PDT
by
xrp
To: AntiGuv
Race can be a factor but it cannot be a SOLE factor and must be used "sparingly." Those two phrases simply open the door to more litigation. Its by no means settled yet.
46
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:40 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Howlin
FNC reporting the undergraduate admissions policy---struck down! Split decision.
47
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:47 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(If Lawton Chiles runs for the Senate seat in 2004, we will **really** have Jurassic Park in Florida)
To: justshe
Undergrad program Admission Policy struke down.
48
posted on
06/23/2003 7:24:51 AM PDT
by
justshe
(Educate....not Denigrate !)
To: Mo1
That is the important one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
49
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:03 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: B Knotts
I'm guessing the reasoning for the split decision is somewhat less than, say, Solomon-like.
50
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:12 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: Numbers Guy
So there is a chance that the undergrad case will fall the other direction and the admission policy will be found unconstitutional?
To: NautiNurse
Well....that is something. I wonder how strongly it was struck down, however.
To: Howlin
OK....wonder how they kept one, but not the other?
53
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:32 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(FR - the truth, and nothing but the truth.........getting to the bottom of journalistic bias.)
To: Howlin
I know ...
54
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:40 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: NautiNurse
The undergraduate policy was the really bad one..........this is stunning.
The law school had a more narrowly drawn policy, so sez Major Garrett.
55
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:51 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping
56
posted on
06/23/2003 7:25:58 AM PDT
by
firewalk
To: Dog Gone
O'Connor is a notorious waffler and hair-splitter. Queen of the "balancing test". At this point, I'd be surprised if the undergrad decision comes out the same way. Drawing a distinction between the law school policy and the undergrad policy is precisely the type of thing she does as a matter of course.
I'm putting my money on a "split decision".
57
posted on
06/23/2003 7:26:05 AM PDT
by
XJarhead
To: Brian S
Good grief, takes with one hand and gives with the other. This is so absurd--a ruling to confuse and increase litigation. I'd be happier if it had gone all the way to undergrad--at least there'd be more than smoke to fight...
58
posted on
06/23/2003 7:26:13 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: Howlin
Excellent! Had the undergrad points system been upheld, that would've been a true travesty. I can somewhat accept the law school decision - although I would've chosen a different outcome..
59
posted on
06/23/2003 7:26:28 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Howlin
What does this mean? Its okay for grad school but not okay for undergrads?
60
posted on
06/23/2003 7:26:50 AM PDT
by
ewing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 641-647 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson