Posted on 06/14/2003 2:43:35 PM PDT by HAL9000
A US marine expeditionary force was heading for the strife-riven west African state of Liberia on Friday night after Washington came under increased pressure to deploy troops in what would be its biggest military engagement in Africa since the early 1990s.The USS Kearsarge, carrying 1,800 marines, 1,200 sailors and attack helicopters, was diverted on its homeward voyage from Iraq to prepare for the possible evacuation of civilians from Liberia where rebel fighters have reached the edge of the capital, Monrovia.
The ship's redeployment comes amid concerns in the US military that its forces are overstretched.
The US army is engaged in combat operations in Iraq some six weeks after President George W. Bush said they were over.
The US has avoided engagements in Africa since the ill-fated Somalia intervention, when 18 army rangers lost their lives in Mogadishu on a single day.
There is resistance in the Bush administration to the idea of the US being co-opted as a global policeman, especially in a region where it has no clear strategic interest. Many Republicans severely criticised the Clinton administration for its entanglement in Somalia.
Lt Col MJ Jadick, of the task force, under US European command, said the Kearsarge was already in the region. US military officials said a small group of US troops had already arrived in Monrovia to help the embassy.
The diversion of the USS Kearsarge follows calls for a US-led multinational intervention force to secure a fragile ceasefire after a week of renewed fighting between the Liberian rebels and the government of Charles Taylor (pictured). One official said there were proposals for the US to join up to 2,000 Nigerian peacekeepers, with the US running a headquarters and logistics base.
Remi Oyo, spokeswoman for President Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria, said Nigeria had been talking to the US, but declined to give further details.
A United Nations diplomat said it was possible the Security Council could give its blessing to a temporary deployment in Liberia of troops from the US and other nations.
International Crisis, an influential lobby group, has led calls for the US to intervene in a country that was founded by freed American slaves in 1847. There are concerns that new instability in Liberia risks spiralling to much of west Africa.
"Just as the UK led in Sierra Leone and France led in the Ivory Coast, the US must now assist the nation it helped establish, including through the deployment of troops if necessary," it said in a recent briefing.
Reuters reported that Liberia's warring parties were on Friday haggling over a ceasefire at peace talks in Ghana. Despite a halt in fighting, neither Mr Taylor nor rebels seemed ready to resolve their differences.
But we are caving into international pressure. It's not like there aren't a bunch of countries around Liberia, nor Europe, around to hel out.
Clearly it's going to be a lower priority than several other foreign issues, and our resources are already stretched thin over Afghanistan, Iraq, the Middle East Road Map, the Koreas, etc. But if there is something we can do effectively that can improve the situation in Liberia, we should take action.
The U.S. should be actively involved in a diplomatic solution for the Liberian conflict. This involves removing Charles Taylor from his position as head of state ASAP, but I don't think military action will be required to accomplish that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.