Skip to comments.
Democrats Shunning Gun Control
Washington Times ^
| James G. Lakely
Posted on 05/31/2003 12:46:42 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:03:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Democrats appear to have abandoned gun control as a political wedge, declining to push the issue in Congress despite being given the opportunity by congressional Republicans. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, upbraided President Bush earlier this month for not pushing fellow Republicans to bring the assault-weapons ban up for reauthorization before it expires in September 2004. "The president has announced that he supports the assault ban, and it would be helpful if he used his good offices to do that," Mrs. Pelosi said at her last weekly press briefing before the Memorial Day recess. "I don't know whether he intends to or not." House Republicans consider it a pretty safe bet that he won't, and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas has stated that the chances of a renewal of the ban coming to the House floor are slim. Yet Democrats still have options
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; guncontrol; jamesglakely; lyingrats; nra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
To: Joe Brower
Buy lots of ammo. Do it today. Thanks for the ping. I plan to pick up 3 cases of Winchester White Box this week.
81
posted on
06/01/2003 2:47:07 PM PDT
by
Mulder
(Live Free or die)
To: Travis McGee
"Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot." Asinine liberal quote of the year.
Isn't it interesting how those how are supposedly "anti-gun" are always the first to suggest using guns against those with whom they disagree?
82
posted on
06/01/2003 2:49:59 PM PDT
by
Mulder
(Live Free or die)
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
The problem with your stance is that the left is so vehemently charged to take away our rights, that they'll never stop. All it takes is a few moments of weakness and they can ram this legislation through. How do you think they got the Assault Rifle Ban passed? A "defense" game is a losing game. Eventually the other side scores. What needs to happen is to repeal and roll back the gun control measures, starting with making sure the AW ban sunsets.
Once the AW ban sunsets, and "pre-ban"-type stuff is once again made, enough people will stockpile such stuff that it would be decades before private supply was exhausted, should another ban be imposed
The big one is the Gun Control Act of 1968, which imposed record-keeping on FFL's. If we were able to cancel THAT, then the feds would no longer have a way to maintain records on what's in private hands, and registration/confiscation would be impossible
83
posted on
06/01/2003 4:38:34 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
To: Shooter 2.5
Thanks for the post!
84
posted on
06/01/2003 4:43:08 PM PDT
by
BenR2
((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
To: Shooter 2.5; *bang_list; Joe Brower
Blaine Rummel, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence:..."The Democrats ran away from gun safety in the 2002 elections, and look where it got them...Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot." If the gun confiscators have their way, shot by whom? Certainly by the criminals since they will be the only ones to have guns then. 2nd Amendment BUMP!!!
To: jmc813
Those who wish to destroy the Second Amendment will be back in the future and I'll be waiting with my pen, keyboard and my vote that will go to whoever supports the Bill of Rights.
86
posted on
06/01/2003 7:51:29 PM PDT
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: Shooter 2.5
Uh-oh. They're not waking up are they?
To: punster
Look for a mass shooting or two just before the bill comes up for a vote.
To: Texas Eagle
Here's the tricky part.
Do we hope they keep trying and losing elections or do we hope they see the light and the dem party comes back even stronger so they can start this junk all over again?
I would say I hope they quit trying to pass gun control. We have long memories and we won't vote for them if they all became life members of the GOA.
89
posted on
06/01/2003 8:28:15 PM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Mulder
They are really little commissars at heart. They hate guns because they stand in the way of their designs.
90
posted on
06/01/2003 9:02:35 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: jimkress
Dan Quayle would agree.
To: Indrid Cold
"Look for a mass shooting or two just before the bill comes up for a vote."
The Demwits, like Nancy Pelosi, Chuckie Schumerde, Diane Schweinstein, etc., and the lying bastards at HCI and the VPC are desperately praying for a massacre.
92
posted on
06/01/2003 9:16:59 PM PDT
by
punster
To: Shooter 2.5; Cacique
Sadly, here in the Sheeple's Republic of New York, both the Republicans AND Democrats continue to argue for more limitations on our Second Amendment rights. I was even at an acquaintance's birthday party recently in NYC, where a Republican lawyer argued that supporting the Second Amendment was costing us votes.
I say, screw Lawn Guyland, New Jersey and Chicago's North Shore suburbs. We have picked up MORE votes on defense of RTKBA issues than we have lost.
93
posted on
06/01/2003 10:06:57 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
(East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
To: Clemenza
Since I was ta the same dinner, I should emphasize that he was a LAWYER. Lawyers believe the more laws there are, the more work they have. The Repuiblican part should ban lawyers from membership.
94
posted on
06/02/2003 12:41:53 AM PDT
by
Cacique
To: Shooter 2.5
"I don't believe they will ever give up the fight to disarm the American People."
Indeed they will not give up; and to imagine otherwise is to be foolishly 'lulled'!
95
posted on
06/02/2003 4:12:02 AM PDT
by
cricket
To: Shooter 2.5
"Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot." I can't handle this much irony before my morning coffee.
To: Shooter 2.5
Good job on the post.
FWIW, you might try my formatting approach: I copy the whole article to an MS Word document, do the formatting there so I can visualize what it will look like when it covers the whole screen.
Then I paste it back into the FR box.
Keep up the good work.
97
posted on
06/02/2003 6:08:36 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: jimkress
"Wonder what liberal gun control freek and no doubt registered Democrat Rummel suggests this unnamed person be shot with? Potatoe cannon."
Thank you, Dan Quayle.
<grin>
98
posted on
06/02/2003 6:11:28 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
I knew I goofed as soon as I saw it. I do the formatting when it's first copied but I think I distracted myself because I wasn't sure I wanted the whole article.
I think that's my fourth posting.
The article really doesn't mean that much to people in California, Illinois or the Northeast states.
99
posted on
06/02/2003 7:55:47 AM PDT
by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
Don't sweat the small stuff. Good job.
100
posted on
06/02/2003 8:07:18 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson