Personally, I think the time for private schools or home schools has come.
Posted on 05/30/2003 2:17:48 PM PDT by certify
Language Police Bar 'Old,' 'Blind' in Textbooks Wed May 28, 2003 11:01 AM ET By Arthur Spiegelman
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Oh heck: Hell hath no place in American primary and high school textbooks.
But then again you can't find anyone riding on a yacht or playing polo in the pages of an American textbook either. The texts also can't say someone has a boyish figure, or is a busboy, or is blind, or suffers a birth defect, or is a biddy, or the best man for the job, a babe, a bookworm, or even a barbarian.
All these words are banned from U.S. textbooks on the grounds that they either elitist (polo, yacht) sexist (babe, boyish figure), offensive (blind, bookworm) ageist (biddy) or just too strong (hell which is replaced with darn or heck). --------God is also a banned word in the textbooks because he or she is too religious.
To get the full 500-word list of what is banned and why, consult "The Language Police," a new book by New York University professor of education Dianne Ravitch, a former education official in President George H.W. Bush's administration and a consultant to the Clinton administration.
She says she stumbled on her discovery of what's allowed and not allowed by accident because publishers insist that they do not impose censorship on their history and English textbook authors but merely apply rules of sensitivity -- which have expanded mightily since first introduced in the 1970s to weed out gender and racial bias.
Ravitch's book is taking people by surprise the same way that Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" did in the 1960s in exposing the effects of pesticides.
THE OLDER PERSON AND WATER
She says a lot of people are having fun finding new titles for Ernest Hemingway's "The Old Man and the Sea" which presents problems with every word except "and" and "the." Ravitch said old is ageist, man is sexist and sea can't be used in case a student lives inland and doesn't grasp the concept of a large body of water.
But some people say the phenomenon of sanitizing words and thought is not isolated to textbook publishers seeking not to offend anyone so that sales can be as wide as possible.
The New York Times recently reported that National Institute of Health researchers on AIDS are not only avoiding using words like gay and homosexuals in e-mails so as not to offend conservatives in the Bush administration, they are also inventing code words.
Times journalist Erica Goode reported that one researcher was told to "cleanse" the abstract of his grant proposal of words like gay, homosexual and transgender even though his research was on HIV in gay men.
Nor is the government the only source of constraint or censorship in the watch-what-you-say business. Wal-Mart, the nation's largest retailer, recently banned racy men's magazines from its shelves although it continues to sell sexy underwear.
According to Ravitch both the right wing and the left wing get what they want in American textbooks, for example an emphasis on family values and equality among ethnic groups.
"Everyone gets their pet causes incorporated in textbooks. The history texts are reluctant to criticize any dictator unless they are long dead. And even then, there are exceptions like Mao is praised in one text for modernizing China but his totalitarian rule is not mentioned," she said.
She was also unhappy to see photos in one text of Saudi women working as doctors and nurses because that implied that they had gender equality.
"You also can't say Mother Russia or Fatherland or brotherhood in texts and that's both silly, trivial and breathtaking. It is like George Orwell's 'Newspeak' come to life," she said in an interview, referring to the manipulation of language in "1984."
Ravitch said that textbook publishing is controlled by four main publishers and they aim to sell texts state by state, thus forcing them to dumb down the books and make the language as inoffensive as possible. "They don't want controversy and they don't want people screaming," she said.
Are you implying that cave women grunt? That's offensive!!! :-)
I don't get it. Who has dictators for their "pet cause"? What dictators are conservatives supposed to favor, I wonder. And especially, what modern ones? This doesn't make sense to me.
And what compatible substitute rhymes with "rod"?
And by not using the word "sea" he will doubtlessly have a much better chance of grasping the concept.
I picture a blind barbarian biddy with a boyish figure in a back room making these decisions. She is probably the best man for the job.
I really like the part about deleting the word "sea" from "The Old Man and the Sea" because some people don't live near big bodies of water. If we are going to reduce the language to only those things which we have all experienced, the dictionary will be very small. Something like the language of a two-year-old.
Yes... just type them into Google and......
Oh, wait: that won't work.............
But these sorts of textbooks are inherently offensive to anyone who understands the realities of the human condition. They are sufficiently corrupting, that frankly, it would be better if the students had no textbooks at all--at least none provided by public authorities--than that the students come to see human life through this sort of a lens. The rational response, I would suggest, is that if this sort of text book is used in your school district, you should go out and work as hard as possible against all school tax levies--and let the local school board understand why! (Of course, there are other reasons for doing the same thing, such as the NEA pushed life adjustment courses.)
American children are not the property of Leftwingers. They have no right to be brainwashing them--or trying to brainwash them in this manner.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
can someone fine them
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.