Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Hope, subversive! (Nastiest hit-piece I have seen)
MSNBC and Slate.com ^ | 05/30/03 | Neal Pollack

Posted on 05/30/2003 12:17:30 PM PDT by AbsoluteJustice

May 29 — When Bob Hope was born 100 years ago today, the world was a substantially different place. Coal had not yet been discovered. Some people still walked on their hands. Most important, there was a void in the world that didn’t allow human laughter. Before Bob Hope, the world was a pit of human sorrow. Now, laughter is everywhere.

• Get Life Insurance • eDiets Diet Center • Yellow Pages • Get A Loan • expedia.com • Shopping

JOHN STEINBECK once wrote of Bob, “There is a man. There really is a man.” Sadly, though, little else has been written about him, and even less has been understood. In this piece I intend to reveal the truth about the real Bob, which has been covered up by media titans throughout the decades. They’ve had good reason. Bob Hope is perhaps our country’s leading subversive, its most strident political radical. As the following timeline will indicate, if Bob had gotten his way over the years, America would have been a different place. Actually, if he’d really gotten his way, it would have been turned over to the Cherokee. Happy Birthday, Bob!

1907 His livelihood crushed by a union lockout at United Stone and Steel, a British mason named William Henry Hope moves his family to Cleveland, Ohio, to seek a better life. The fifth of his seven children is Leslie Townes Hope, who becomes the Bob we adore. Bob later jokes, “I left England at the age of 4 after my father’s dreams were crushed by the cruel machinery of capitalist enterprise.”

1920 Bob begins amateur boxing as “The Battling Suffragette.” He quits after dropping a bout to Emma Goldman.

• A Hope-ful century • The early years • Slapstick and the great divide

• A Hope-ful century

• The early years

• Slapstick and the great divide

1923 With vaudeville partner George Byrne, Bob debuts on Broadway in the revue Arise, Ye Children of Oppression. The show closes when Ruby Keeler breaks an ankle during the Potemkin dance. “I used to struggle to make ends meet,” Bob later said. “I wouldn’t have had anything to eat if it wasn’t for the stuff the audience threw at me. That just shows you how a political system based on class stratification degrades the working man.”

1933 Bob’s first major career break comes when he’s cast as the wisecracking union organizer Huckleberry Haines in the Broadway musical Roberta. That same year, at a Eugene Debs fund-raiser at the Vogue Club on 57th Street, he meets a young singer named Dolores, whose passionate anti-fascist speeches cause him to swoon with love.

1938 Bob Hope with his wife Dolores, in 1939 Fresh off his successful movie debut in The Big Broadcast of 1938, where he first sings his signature hit, “Thanks for the Memories, O Red Brigade Martyrs of Spain,” Bob gets asked by Pepsodent to do his own radio show on NBC. He refuses the offer until the company agrees to stop selling toothpaste to the Nazis.

1942 After a vicious battle with the studio, a duet between Bob and Dorothy Lamour that decries the injustice of purdah is cut from The Road to Morocco. Hope tells Daily Variety, “Crosby is a dangerous reactionary.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthday; bobhope; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: AbsoluteJustice
It's just dumb. If you want to make jokes about Bob Hope, you should at least be funny.
21 posted on 05/30/2003 12:35:42 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
That's what I thought....
22 posted on 05/30/2003 12:36:36 PM PDT by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
You didn't read the whole article did you? If I were you I'd beg the moderator to pull this thread. Hit the abuse button now and save yourself...
23 posted on 05/30/2003 12:39:37 PM PDT by Drango (There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binaries, and those that don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
I went to his websight.....its revealing. He's a wacko lefty that thinks his cleverness with the written word gives him veracity.

He's a punk jerk!

24 posted on 05/30/2003 12:39:40 PM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: AbsoluteJustice
What a bunch of morons.

H-U-M-O-R.
26 posted on 05/30/2003 12:45:03 PM PDT by moyden2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Crappy satire. He needs a remedial class.
27 posted on 05/30/2003 12:45:35 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
This wouldn't just be a little ruse by you and your buds to create hits for the in-trouble doggerel rag called slate would it?
28 posted on 05/30/2003 12:46:41 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Funny that this would be written by a lefty. It seems that the conflict is that someone who is loved by millions upon millions of America could NEVER be a leftist, and that is why the author portrays him as such. I really cant see any other meaning in this peace, as I am not a mentally confused lefty...JFK
29 posted on 05/30/2003 12:48:39 PM PDT by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
It is clearly labeled "Satire" at the top of the piece.
30 posted on 05/30/2003 12:49:36 PM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
read later
31 posted on 05/30/2003 12:51:22 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
Actually, this piece is indeed instructive. It is what passes for liberal humor. Non sequiturs, abrasive insults, and the all out liberal fun of trashing a revered icon.

It sort of speaks to that liberal soul that believes in nothing, trusts nothing, and loves nothing.

32 posted on 05/30/2003 12:55:35 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
And I saw this but it is MSNBC!!! They HATE perople who support the military so I highly DOUBT it was satire.
33 posted on 05/30/2003 12:57:39 PM PDT by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
What was Hope's political ideology? Anybody know?
34 posted on 05/30/2003 12:59:48 PM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
They claim it's satire, so I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. It's not very funny, regardless.
35 posted on 05/30/2003 1:01:11 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arjay
For the last time THIS IS NOT SATIRE !!!! This is why I posted this piece.
36 posted on 05/30/2003 1:02:14 PM PDT by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
I read the whole thing, thinking that maybe a final paragraph would wrap up the otherwise incoherent "satire". I was wrong. Satire shouldn't be obvious, but this is just plain cryptic. I don't get it at all.
37 posted on 05/30/2003 1:03:17 PM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
This is what I picked up on too. This is not in the least bit satire. I think it is called satire to cover up his personal dislike for Bob Hope and what he stood for.
38 posted on 05/30/2003 1:05:44 PM PDT by AbsoluteJustice (Kiss me I'm an INFIDEL!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
I'm guessing this writer's idea of satire is taking every patriotic, pro-capitalism, pro-military ideal a man has and turning it against him. What hilarity!
39 posted on 05/30/2003 1:07:25 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AbsoluteJustice
It has a "satire" label on it at the MSNBC site. I missed it at first too, but it at least pretends to be satire. As such, it is woefully unamusing.
40 posted on 05/30/2003 1:14:22 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson