Hersh,S. The Dark Side of Camelot. 1997
Hersh, Seymour M. The Dark Side of Camelot. New York: Little, Brown
and Company, 1997. 498 pages. Seymour Hersh, an investigative ...
www.namebase.org/sources/aW.html - Similar pages
Amazon.com: Books: The Dark Side of Camelot
... I think Seymour Hersh, in the book "The dark side of Camelot", has given more than
just hints that the Kennedy presidency came about as the result of vote fraud ...
www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/ detail/-/0316359556?vi=glance - 64k - Cached - Similar pages
The other real question is: Did it distract Clinton from his job as President? I think it really did.
Which was a good thing for Clinton.
Squired? Why don't they just say screwed? JFK, the Jerry Springer president.
Yeah, but did he get a Lewinsky?
Somebody please explain to me the "irony" here.
Seems to me that this was one of the REASONS that WJC admired JFK, not some ancillary fact.
Two peas in a pod.
Both of them are (were) slimy P'sOS, whose sexual interests not only consisted of a compulsion to bed every nubile (and non-nubile) female form that came closer than 100 feet, they both also had the compulsion to screw the American public.
Kennedy was the most over-rated politician in American history, and the assassination only served to enhance the "legend".
And history will not be kind to the 'Toon, either.
Wanna bet we'll see something sooner or later about the 'Toons desire to have been assassinated in office, so as to enhance his "legend"?
The 'Toon wanted to bring back "Camelot", but only succeeded in building Mabel's Whorehouse.
Probably because they got all the old stuff out of the WH basement that Kennedy and his pimps and procurers used.
At least that idiot Kennedy had an original idea or two. The 'Toon never met an idea or concept that he wouldn't steal from someone else.
More's the pity.
The everybody-does-it defense redux...
The only difference here is that no one has suggested, ever, that JFK was trailer trash, in appearance as well as in deed.
Don't they ever give up?
I am going to keep a copy of that latest shrill, hysterical Hilary speech to remind me how close we are to having a real full-blown nut running for the country's leadership.
Unfortunate phasing. LOL!
What did he accomplish as president? It probably did distract him. He also wasn't the athletic rugged guy they pretended, he was living on painkillers. Maybe someone else was running things.
No! No! No! The real question for JFK and WJC and other adulterers and philanderers is, did it make him susceptible to external pressure, i.e. blackmailable. In the case of WJC it made him at minimum far more subject to pressure and manipulation by Hillary. It also required him to bribe or coerce any number of people who knew his "secrets".
Somehown it seems fitting that its an oral history
Margaret Carlson, on C-SPAN this morning seemed surprised that the story didn't also mention that Ms. Gamarekian was a long time reporter for the New York Times.
Better photo: Judy Exner